IsoEnergy Commences Athabasca Basin Winter 2025 Exploration Program
Highlights
-
Hurricane Deposit Resource Expansion
- Approximately 2,800 metres of drilling in seven holes will target gaps in historic drilling near the Hurricane deposit and 2024's Target Area B (Figure 2).
- Drilling will test areas where prior results indicate geochemical anomalies and alteration associated with fault extensions that control mineralization within the Hurricane resource (Figure 2).
-
Greenfield Targets Along the Larocque Trend
- Up to 6,000 metres of drilling in 15 holes will test a six-kilometre segment of the Larocque Trend east of the Hurricane deposit (Figures 3 and 4).
- Drilling will focus initially on three target areas (D, E, and F) identified through 2024's integration of geophysical and geochemical data. The trend on which these target areas lie extends eastward on to IsoEnergy and Purepoint Uranium's joint venture announced late last year (Figure 2).
-
Geophysical Surveys on Highly Ranked, Early-Stage Projects
- Ground geophysical surveys are planned on the East Rim, Evergreen, and Hawk projects (Figure 1) to advance targets to the drill-ready stage.
Resource Expansion Targets at Hurricane
Drilling will commence with testing resource expansion targets near the Hurricane deposit and between it and 2024 Target Area B (Figure 2). Review of 2024 and past drill results has highlighted gaps in drill hole patterns where nearby holes intersected indicative geochemistry and alteration along projected extensions of faults which control mineralization within the Hurricane resource.
Historical results on the south side of the Hurricane deposit are encouraging, with drill hole LE22-115A intersecting 1% U₃O₈ over 2.0 m and LE21-101 intersecting 0.6% U₃O₈ over 4.5 m, including a higher-grade interval of 3.1% U₃O₈ over 0.5 m (see
Holes from the east end of the Hurricane resource footprint and to the east end of ambient noise tomography ("ANT") target Area B drilled in 2024 have strong illite clay alteration and uranium partial ("Up") geochemical signatures, and structural disruption so additional holes are planned to test drilling gaps in this area that is along the eastward strike extension of the faults that control the main portion of the Hurricane deposit.
Finally, review of historical drill hole data reveals that the northern faults at Hurricane – intersected in holes drilled from the north to intersect the deposit at depth (e.g. LE19-15) - remain largely untested at the unconformity, presenting a compelling target which will be tested this winter.
Regional Targets on the Larocque Trend
With addition of a second drill rig, drilling of greenfield targets are expected to proceed from west to east across the Larocque Trend, as drill trails are prepared. The Larocque Trend is an important regional structure that hosts the world-class Hurricane deposit and other notable high-grade occurrences including those on Cameco/Orano's
* See Qualified Person Statement below.
Three of the target areas (D, E, and F) defined in 2024 that will be prioritized are characterized by anomalous Up geochemistry, indicative clay species alteration mineralogy, and prospective structure projected from nearby holes within the Larocque Trend and within seismic low velocity zones defined by 2024 ANT surveys and resistivity lows outlined by past DC-resistivity surveys. A joint inversion of electromagnetic and DC resistivity data to develop improved resistivity mapping of alteration is in progress and will be used in refining drill targets. Planned drill holes will be focussed initially in areas D, E and F and plans will evolve depending on results as the program proceeds. Unconformity target depth shallows to the east and is at 175 m vertical depth in hole LE24-180 at Area E versus a 325 m at the Hurricane deposit.
Area D, corresponding to adjacent portions of areas D, I and J as defined by 2024 ANT surveys (see
Area E corresponds to an ANT velocity low roughly coincident with the hinge of an east-trending, moderately west-plunging fold at the east end of the property, where
Area F, located in the northeast, is centered on the conductor corridor and aligns with roughly coincident ANT velocity low and resistivity anomalies. 2025 drilling in areas E and F will also help correlations between fertile trends on the Larocque East project and conductors on the
Developing Drill Targets on Additional Highly Ranked Projects
Ground gravity surveys are planned on the East Rim and Evergreen projects (Figure 1) that cover multiple conductive and structural corridors on the southeast basin margin. Stepwise moving loop electromagnetic surveys are planned for
Update on Plan of Arrangement with
Qualified Person Statement
The scientific and technical information contained in this news release was reviewed and approved by Dr.
For additional information regarding the Company's
Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
Quality Assurance in uranium exploration benefits from the use of down-hole gamma probes and hand- held scintillometers/spectrometers, as discrepancies between radioactivity levels and geochemistry can be readily identified.
For unmineralized samples such as composite and spot samples, field insertions are made at the rate of 1% for blanks, 2% for duplicates and 1% CRMs. The following protocols are followed:
- Sample IDs ending in 00 will be certified blanks (BLA1).
- Sample IDs ending in 25 and 75 will be duplicates (DUPL) of the preceding sample.
- Sample IDs ending in 50 will be CRM OREAS 120 (O120).
In addition to
No QA/QC samples are inserted for reflectance samples as analyses are semi-quantitative only.
Assaying and Analytical Procedures
Composite and spot samples were shipped to
The samples were then dried, crushed, and pulverized as part of the ICPMS Exploration Package (codes ICPMS1 and ICPMS2) plus boron (code Boron). Samples were analyzed for uranium content, a variety of pathfinder elements, rare earth elements, and whole rock constituents with the ICPMS Exploration Package (plus boron). The Exploration Package consists of three analyses using a combination of inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry ("ICP- OES"), and partial or total acid digestion of one aliquot of representative sample pulp per analysis. Total digestion is performed via a combination of hydrofluoric, nitric, and perchloric acids while partial digestion is completed via nitric and hydrochloric acids. In-house quality control performed by SRC consists of multiple instrumental and analytic checks using an in-house standard ASR316. Instrumental check protocols consist of two calibration blanks and two calibration standards. Analytical protocols require one blank, two QA/QC standards, and one replicate sample analysis.
Samples with radioactivity over 350 CPS measured by Radiation Solutions RS- 125 were also shipped to SRC. Sample preparation procedures are the same as for the ICPMS Exploration Package, samples were analyzed by ICP-OES only (Code ICP1) and for U3O8 using hydrochloric and nitric acid digestion followed by ICP-OES finish, capable of detecting U3O8 weight percent as low as 0.001%.
Selective samples to be analyzed for gold, and in some instances, platinum and palladium, by fire assay using aqua regia digestion with ICP-OES finish. Analytical protocols utilized replicate sample analysis; however, no in-house standards were used for these small batches. Boron analysis has a lower detection limit of 2 ppm and is completed via ICP-OES after the aliquot is fused in a mixture of sodium superoxide (NaO2) and NaCO3. SRC in-house quality control for boron analysis consists of a blank, QC standards and one replicate with each batch of samples.
Borehole Radiometric Probing Method
All successfully completed 2024 drillholes were radiometrically logged using calibrated downhole
Sample Collection Methods
All drill core was systematically logged to record its geological and geotechnical attributes by
Composite geochemistry samples consist of roughly one-centimetre-long chips of core collected every 1.5 m to geochemically characterize unmineralized sections of sandstone and basement. Composite sample lengths are between five and ten m (typically 3 to 7 chips per sample). A minor revision to the sampling protocols introduced in 2024 is that rather than maintaining five metre sample lengths from 50 m above the unconformity to the unconformity, for five metres above and two metres below the unconformity composite sample intervals are now only 0.5 m long and the samples are composed of several chips of core in each interval. This is to provide better resolution of anomalous geochemistry along the unconformity, especially in greenfield exploration drill holes.
Split-core"spot" (i.e., representative) samples were collected through zones of significant but unmineralized alteration and/or structure. Spot sample length varies depending on the width of the feature of interest but are generally 0.5 m in length.
Split-core mineralization ("MINZ") samples are collected through zones of elevated radioactivity exceeding 350 CPS measured via RS-125 handheld spectrometer.
Systematic short-wave infrared ("SWIR") reflectance ("REFL") samples were collected from approximately the middle of each composite sample for analysis of clays, micas, and a suite of other generally hydrous minerals which have exploration significance. Spot reflectance samples were collected where warranted (i.e., fracture coatings). Reflectance samples are not collected through mineralized zone.
For lithogeochemistry samples, sample tags with the sample number were placed in the sample bags before they are sealed and packed in plastic pails or steel drums for shipment to the
Geologists entered all geological, geotechnical and sample interval data into
Sample Shipment and Security
Drill core was delivered from the drill to
About
Neither the
Forward-Looking Information
The information contained herein contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. "Forward-looking information" includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, planned exploration activities for 2025 and the anticipated results thereof; and statements with respect to the potential consummation of the Arrangement or other options and alternatives. Generally, but not always, forward-looking information and statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates", or "believes" or the negative connotation thereof or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved" or the negative connotation thereof.
Such forward-looking information and statements are based on numerous assumptions, including among others, that the results of planned exploration activities are as anticipated and will be reported when anticipated, the price of uranium, the anticipated cost of planned exploration activities, that general business and economic conditions will not change in a material adverse manner, that financing will be available if and when needed and on reasonable terms, that third party contractors, equipment and supplies and governmental and other approvals required to conduct the Company's planned exploration activities will be available on reasonable terms and in a timely manner, that
Forward-looking information and statements also involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual events or results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future events or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking information or statements, including, among others: negative operating cash flow and dependence on third party financing, uncertainty of additional financing, no known mineral reserves or resources, the limited operating history of the Company, the influence of a large shareholder, alternative sources of energy and uranium prices, aboriginal title and consultation issues, reliance on key management and other personnel, actual results of exploration activities being different than anticipated, changes in exploration programs based upon results, availability of third party contractors, availability of equipment and supplies, failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry, environmental risks, changes in laws and regulations, community relations, delays in obtaining governmental or other approval, the inability of IsoEnergy and
Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking information or implied by forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information and statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated, estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or reissue forward-looking information as a result of new information or events except as required by applicable securities laws.
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/isoenergy-commences-athabasca-basin-winter-2025-exploration-program-302350341.html
SOURCE