Rupert Resources Completes Pre-Feasibility for Ikkari Confirming a High-Margin Project Net Present Value of USD1.7 Billion and IRR of 38%
This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250218078462/en/

Figure 1: Gold production per annum over LOM and average grade (Au g/t) of mill feed
{All figures are in US$ unless otherwise noted}
PFS HIGHLIGHTS
-
Maiden Mineral Reserve declared for the
Ikkari Project withProbable Mineral Reserve of 52Mt at 2.1g/t Au for 3.5Moz Au representing an 85% Mineral Resource to Mineral Reserve conversion. -
All weather project economics with leverage to higher gold prices: After-tax Net Present Value (5% discount) (“NPV”) of
$1.7 billion with unlevered Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) of 38% and payback after 2.2 years, assuming long term market consensus gold price of$2,150 per troy ounce (“oz”). NPV of$2.5 billion with IRR of 49% and 1.7 year payback at$2,650 /oz. -
High margin production profile: Expected lowest quartile all-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) of
$918 /oz over LOM, and$717 /oz during years 1 to 10 primarily due to a high open pit grade and low strip ratio. - Long life: 20-year life of mine (“LOM”) comprising an open-pit operation for the first 10 years with average annual production of 227koz per annum, transitioning to an underground operation (years 10 - 20).
-
Manageable initial capital requirement of
$575 million including contingency with project maintaining the low capital intensity indicated by the 2022 Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”). -
100% Contained within Rupert Property: All project infrastructure contained within Rupert’s 100% owned exploration licences. Access road, power line and discharge pipeline permitted though separate auxiliary permitting process and do not require siting on mining or exploration permits held by
Rupert Resources . - First gold pour targeted in 2030 based on Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) submission and Definitive Feasibility Study (“DFS”) initiation in H2 2025, a 24-month permitting timeline and a 2½ year construction period.
Financial model after-tax project value and returns at range of gold prices
Gold price (USD / troy ounce) |
NPV ($m)* |
IRR (%) |
Payback (Years) |
1700 (Reserve price) |
950 |
27% |
3.1 |
2150 (base case & LT consensus) |
1,700 |
38% |
2.2 |
2650 |
2,500 |
49% |
1.7 |
3000 (high case) |
3,100 |
56% |
1.4 |
*NPV rounded to 2 significant figures at all gold prices
Financial Model Assumptions
Assumption |
Unit |
Value |
Gold Price (unless stated otherwise) |
USD / Troy Ounce |
2150 |
Discount rate |
% |
5 |
Exchange rate |
EUR : USD |
1 : 1.05 |
Corporate tax rate |
% |
20 |
State and landowner royalties1 |
% |
0.75 |
10.75% combined state and landowner royalty payable on plant feed gold content.
PFS Summary
Ikkari is a grassroots discovery made in 2020 by Rupert and completion of the PFS represents a major milestone for the company as it advances the
The Ikkari PFS envisages a staged mine design to minimise waste stripping and enable early production from high grade areas in the open pit. The open pit will produce ore for 10 years before transitioning to a long hole open stope (“LHOS”) underground mine from year 10 for the remainder of the 20-year LOM. Both the grade and the low strip ratio in the open pit are key drivers of a lowest quartile ASIC operation set out in the PFS.
Production Summary |
|||
Years 1 to 10 |
LOM (20 years) |
||
Milled tonnes (Mt) |
35 |
52 |
|
Mill tonnes per annum (Mt/year) |
3.5 |
2.6 |
|
Average processed gold grade (g/t Au) |
2.1 |
2.1 |
|
Average metallurgical recovery (%) |
95.8 |
95.8 |
|
Average annual gold production (koz) |
227 |
167 |
|
Saleable gold (koz) |
2,270 |
3,340 |
|
1Total Cash Cost ($/saleable oz) |
603 |
747 |
|
Sustaining capital ($/saleable oz) |
115 |
171 |
|
2All in Sustaining Cost (AISC) ($/saleable oz) |
717 |
918 |
|
Total initial capital including contingency ($ M) |
575 |
||
1Cash cost includes selling expenses
2As per the World Gold guidance (Gold All in Sustaining Costs | Gold AISC |
Project economics
Life of Mine |
Years |
20 |
Net Present Value* ^ |
US $m |
1,700 |
Internal Rate of Return (unlevered)* |
% |
38 |
Payback |
Years |
2.2 |
Capital Expenditure (Initial) |
US $m |
575 |
Capital Expenditure (Sustaining) |
US $m |
571 |
Gross Revenue^ |
US $m |
7,200 |
Operating Cost^ |
US $m |
2,400 |
Free Cash Flow (after tax)^ |
US $m |
2,800 |
*Modelled using $2150/oz gold and 5% discount rate; ^Rounded to 2 significant figures
Operating cost estimate
Operating cost |
Unit |
Yrs 1 to 10 |
LOM |
OP mining unit cost |
$/t material mined |
4.11 |
|
OP Strip ratio |
Waste : Ore ratio |
3.72 |
|
OP mining unit cost |
$/t ore mined |
17.21 |
|
UG mining unit cost |
$/t ore mined |
46.0 |
|
Mining |
$/t ore milled |
19.6 |
26.1 |
Processing |
$/t ore milled |
11.9 |
13.4 |
Co-Disposal Storage |
$/t ore milled |
2.5 |
2.0 |
Water Management & Treatment |
$/t ore milled |
1.9 |
2.3 |
Site G&A |
$/t ore milled |
2.2 |
3.0 |
Total Operating Costs |
$/t ore milled |
38.1 |
46.8 |
1Excludes capitalized pre-strip tonnage and cost
2Strip ratio is inclusive of capitalized pre-strip tonnage
Capital cost estimates (All USD millions)
Area |
|
Sustaining Capital |
Mining |
45 |
212 |
Co-Disposal Storage |
34 |
24 |
Surface Infrastructure |
72 |
3 |
Concentrator & Filtration Plant |
190 |
2 |
Closure |
0 |
151 |
Water Management and Treatment |
136 |
118 |
Electrical Engineering |
17 |
2 |
Indirect |
15 |
0 |
Contingency |
66 |
59 |
Total Capital |
575 |
571 |
Ikkari Mineral Reserve
Category |
|
Cut-off |
Tonnage |
Grade |
Gold Content |
|
Au (g/t) |
(Mt) |
Au (g/t) |
Kg |
Ounces |
||
Proven |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Probable |
|
0.34 |
35.7 |
2.2 |
79 920 |
2 486 000 |
Underground |
1.04 |
16.3 |
1.9 |
32 370 |
1 007 000 |
|
Total |
|
52.0 |
2.1 |
112 290 |
3 492 000 |
Notes:
- Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 100,000 and ounces are rounded to the nearest 1,000.
- Mineral Reserves were estimated using the CIM Best Practices Guidelines (as defined below) and classified using the CIM Definition Standards (as defined below)
-
The Qualified Person within the meaning of NI 43-101 (“Qualified Person” or “QP”) for the Mineral Reserve Estimate is Mr.
Timothy Daffern , Technical Director with WSP. The effective date of the estimate isNovember 25, 2024 . -
Mineral Reserves are based on a gold price of
US$1,700 /oz and fixed metallurgical recovery of 95.0% - Open pit Mineral Reserves are converted from Indicated Mineral Resources only through the process of pit optimisation, mine design, schedule and are supported by a positive cash flow analysis.
- Mine design was constrained by a minimum 20m offset to the project boundary
- Open pit Mineral Reserves include 4% dilution and 4% mining losses applied in the production schedule.
- Underground Mineral Reserves are stated using a 1.04 g/t stope cut-off grade. Underground Mineral Reserves are generated through the generation of optimised stopes, design of long hole open stoping, schedule and are supported by a positive cash flow analysis.
- Underground Mineral Reserves account for planned dilution of 15%, unplanned dilution of 6%, secondary dilution of 3% and with mining losses of 4%.
- Mineral Reserves are defined at the point where ore is delivered to the plant. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates.
- Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Ikkari Mineral Resource (inclusive of Mineral Reserves)
Resource Category |
|
Cut-off |
Tonnage (t) |
Grade |
Gold Content |
|
Au (g/t) |
Au (g/t) |
Kg |
Ounces |
|||
Indicated |
|
0.4 |
37 308 000 |
2.21 |
82 400 |
2 649 000 |
Underground |
0.9 |
21 122 000 |
2.12 |
44 700 |
1 437 000 |
|
Total Indicated |
|
58 430 000 |
2.18 |
127 100 |
4 087 000 |
|
Inferred |
|
0.4 |
1 271 000 |
0.81 |
1 000 |
33 000 |
Underground |
0.9 |
2 305 000 |
1.39 |
3 200 |
103 000 |
|
Total Inferred |
|
3 576 000 |
1.18 |
4 200 |
136 000 |
Notes:
- Mineral Resource Estimates are reported in-situ and inclusive of Mineral Reserves.
- Mineral Resources were estimated using the CIM Best Practices Guidelines and classified using the CIM Definition Standards.
- Tonnage and ounces are rounded to the nearest 1 000.
- g/t = grams per tonne, ounces are reported as troy ounces.
- Totals may not add up correctly due to rounding.
-
The QP for this Mineral Resource estimate is Mr.
Brian Thomas ,P.Geo ., an independent QP, within the meaning of NI 43-101 and an employee of WSP Canada Inc. based inSudbury, Ontario, Canada -
The effective date of this Mineral Resource estimate is
October 24, 2023 -
Cut-off grade defined by Gold Price,
$1700 /oz, Metallurgical Recovery 95%, Open Pit Mining Costs$2.9 /t, UndergroundMining Cost $29 /t, Processing Cost$11.30 /t, G&A, Rehabilitation & Closure$4.8 /t, Royalty 0.75%. - Open pit Mineral Resources constrained within a Whittle Optimized open pit shell using the above assumptions with a 26m offset to the property boundary enforced.
- Underground Mineral Resources constrained within the estimation domains to meet the Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction (“RPEEE”) criteria for underground mining.
Mining
The PFS considers extraction of the 3.5Moz Probable Mineral Reserve over a 20 year mine plan with an initial 10 years of mining from open pit with a strip ratio of 3.7 inclusive of pre-stripping. Underground mine development will commence in year 6, with mining by the LHOS method commencing in year 10 through to year 20 (Figures 3 and 4).
Open pit mining will be performed using a conventional truck and shovel configuration with drilling and blasting on 10m benches and the open pit extending to a depth of 300m below surface. The PFS financial model assumes contractor mining except blasting where costs were estimated from first principles. Two stages are planned to maximise early revenue by delaying some waste mining whilst accessing the high-grade ore early in the mining schedule. Open pit operations commence in Year -1, with pre-stripping of the unconsolidated overburden. The open pit operations are planned to produce 3.5Mtpa of ore and cease in Year 11 after with mining transitioning to the underground portion of the deposit.
Underground mining utilises LHOS with a combination of paste and waste rock backfill. Access to the underground mine consists of two declines: one from surface to the east of the open pit with development commencing in year 6 ahead of stoping in year 10. Stopes are planned on 30 m vertical intervals and 15 m intervals between stopes. A primary-secondary stope sequence is planned to enable the underground operations to produce at 2.0 Mtpa to a maximum depth of 540m below surface, 240m below the base of the open pit.
Ikkari open pit strip ratio by stages:
Open Pit Stage |
Strip Ratio (Waste : Ore) |
1 |
2.6 : 1 |
2 |
4.6 : 1 |
Total |
3.7 : 1 |
Note: Strip ratio is inclusive of pre-strip
Processing
Metallurgical test work has confirmed that the expected recovery can be achieved using a conventional flow sheet consisting of crushing and grinding to 100 µm followed by gravity concentration, and intensive leach of the gravity concentrate with carbon-in-leach of the gravity tails. Based on the metallurgical test work results and the proposed flowsheet, the overall projected metallurgical gold recovery is estimated as 95.8% with 29% reporting to the gravity circuit.
Gold will be recovered via electrowinning and poured into doré bars. Tailings from the CIL circuit will be detoxed using a SO2/Air cyanide destruction circuit and pumped to the filtration plant. Tailings will be thickened in a high-rate thickener and feed three horizontal pressure filters prior to reclamation into co-disposal facility.
Co-disposal waste rock and tailings facility
The mining waste and filtered process tailings are to be co-disposed at one location to the north of the plant. This co-disposal facility has a designed capacity of 91.5 Mm³ which includes a 13.5% contingency. The maximum height of the facility approximately 80m to match the surrounding topography and covers an area of approximately 2.0 Mm².
The design allows for phased development during construction and the first few years of LOM. The average side slope of the facility is 1:3, which includes of operational benching. The waste and filtered tailings are to be continuously placed in layers of varying depths depending on the strip ratio and surface area of the facility as it rises. Both the waste and filtered tailings require compaction during deposition.
Water management, treatment and discharge pipeline
Contact water and process water are to be treated in two separate treatment plants. Contact water including run-off and seepage from the co-disposal facility will be collected to the raw water pond, treated, then stored in the treated water pond before being discharged to the
Where possible both groundwater and surface water will be intercepted before contact with the
Process water will be treated and re-cycled back to the process plant via the second water treatment plant significantly reducing raw water requirements. Where necessary, treated contact water will be utilised to top-up process plant requirements.
Project Infrastructure
Surface infrastructure to the Ikkari mine (i.e. process plant, filter plant, maintenance workshops, administration, water treatment plant) will be principally located on a gently undulating hill to east of the proposed open pit. (Figure 6). A network of roads is planned within the site, including the ROM haul road to the ore stockpile and primary crusher, a waste haul road and filtered tailings haul roads. A designated main access road is routed through the plant site accessing the administration building, process plant, workshops, stores and filtration plant. A network of lighter access roads will be provided to access the remaining surface assets.
All project infrastructure is contained within
Access, regional infrastructure and power
Ikkari is well supported by existing infrastructure and is accessed by tarmac and a 5km gravel road from the towns of Kittilä (50km west) and Sodankylä (40km east), both of which provide support services and labour to two existing mines in the area (Kittila, Agnico Eagle and Kevitsa, Boliden). A 220kV power transformer substation is located 9km from Ikkari that can be used as a connection point to the national grid for a 110 kV power line to the Ikkari minesite. A power surplus is envisaged in Lapland towards the end of the decade and the project has access to 100% renewable power.
Stakeholder Engagement
As part of the EIA process, Rupert has established a steering committee where authorities and local stakeholders can give their feedback and comments on the
In total
Next steps, permitting and timeline
The Company plans to submit an EIA for the
Several potential optimisations covering water treatment and closure were noted during the development of the PFS however these could not be fully investigated within the scope of this study. These will be interrogated further during optimisation work ahead of the DFS to ensure the optimal project is considered.
Based on an estimated 24 month environmental permitting period and 30 month required for construction, the first gold pour for Ikkari is now targeted for 2030. (Figure 7)
Study team
The PFS study team was led by WSP, a global provider of consulting and engineering services for mining projects. WSP was supported by Piteau (hydrogeological studies),
Review by Qualified Person and Ikkari Technical Report
The Ikkari Technical Report was prepared and executed by WSP in accordance with NI 43-101. The Qualified Persons for the Ikkari Technical Report are Mr.
This Mineral Resource estimate reflected in the Ikkari Technical Report has been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101. The methodology used to determine the Mineral Resource estimate is consistent with the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best Practices Guidelines (
The QP for the Mineral Resource estimate reflected in the Ikkari Technical report is Mr.
The Mineral Reserves reflected in the Ikkari Technical Report were estimated in accordance with the CIM Best Practice Guidelines. The disclosure of the Reserve Estimate uses the NI 43-101 guidelines and has excluded the use of Inferred Mineral Resources. The QP for this Mineral Reserve estimate is Mr.
Mr.
The NI-43-101 has been filed on SEDAR+ under the Company’s profile and is also available on the Company’s website: www.rupertresources.com
About
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains statements which, other than statements of historical fact constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements with respect to: results of exploration and development activities and mineral resources. The words “may”, “would”, “could”, “will”, “intend”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements included in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements relating to: the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates; plans and expectations regarding future exploration programs; plans and expectations regarding future project development; the progression of the EIA and Definitive Feasibility Study on the timeline contemplated herein, if at all; operating and cost estimates; future gold prices; the LOM; the achievement of commercial production at Ikkari on the timeline contemplated herein, if at all; and the Company’s plans for future advancement of the
Cautionary Note Regarding Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves
Unless otherwise indicated, the scientific and technical disclosure included in this press release, including all Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates contained in such technical disclosure, has been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and the
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250218078462/en/
Chief Executive Officer
gcrew@rupertresources.com
Head of Corporate Development
tcredland@rupertresources.com
Web:
http://rupertresources.com/
Source: