Brookdale Comments on ISS Recommendation
ISS Recommends Shareholders Support the Majority of the Brookdale Board of Directors and Questions Ortelius' Plan for Brookdale
Brookdale Urges Shareholders to Vote "FOR" ALL of Brookdale's Eight Highly Qualified Director Nominees on the BLUE Proxy Card
Brookdale Highlights Critical Skillsets Offered by Directors
Brookdale agrees with ISS's recommendation against giving Ortelius control of the Company's Board of Directors and notes ISS's view that "…the dissident has not provided shareholders with a means to assess performance if it gains control of the board".
Further, ISS notes that "…the dissident does not provide enough details for shareholders to fully assess the plan's feasibility or track execution", also stating:
-
- "The dissident's plan is focused on shrinking the company's portfolio in an effort to improve the company's overall operating metrics, primarily occupancy rates, NOI, and leverage…it is unclear what the expected timing of a sale process would be, what the expected proceeds of a sale would amount to, who the potential buyers are, whether higher occupancy assets need to be included in any portfolios that would be sold, and how the dissident would negotiate with the company's lenders to sell assets that may be part of larger loan collateral pools. Further, the dissident has not indicated the expected extent to which the company may be able to delever."
- "The second primary part of the dissident's plan is for the company to exit the entirety of its leased portfolio… The dissident has not provided an estimate of the potential costs to break the leases. Further, it is unclear whether the company's lessors would be willing to terminate the leases at a reasonable price, and the dissident has not provided sufficient evidence that the company would be able to execute on the planned terminations."
- "The dissident's plan is focused on shrinking the company's portfolio in an effort to improve the company's overall operating metrics, primarily occupancy rates, NOI, and leverage…it is unclear what the expected timing of a sale process would be, what the expected proceeds of a sale would amount to, who the potential buyers are, whether higher occupancy assets need to be included in any portfolios that would be sold, and how the dissident would negotiate with the company's lenders to sell assets that may be part of larger loan collateral pools. Further, the dissident has not indicated the expected extent to which the company may be able to delever."
While we agree with ISS that Ortelius should not have control of the Brookdale Board, we strongly believe that ISS reached the wrong conclusion in failing to recommend that shareholders support ALL of Brookdale's eight highly qualified director nominees. Replacing
Ortelius candidate
By contrast,
Ortelius candidate
On the other hand,
Brookdale's Board has taken an intentional approach to refreshing its composition in order to achieve a balance of tenure, critical skillsets and fresh perspectives brought by directors with a balanced mix of skills that are relevant to Brookdale's business and strategy. If
The Brookdale Board and management team have taken and continue to take deliberate steps to ensure Brookdale's continued growth and value creation. Brookdale's eight highly qualified directors together offer the right mix of expertise and skills necessary to continue delivering positive financial and operational performance and driving enhanced shareholder value.
The Brookdale Board strongly urges shareholders to vote "FOR" ALL of Brookdale's eight nominees on the BLUE proxy card to protect the value of your investment.
Brookdale reminds all shareholders that every vote is important, no matter how many or few shares you own. Please simply disregard any white proxy card you may receive from Ortelius.
Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, please promptly follow the easy instructions on your BLUE proxy card or BLUE voting instruction form to vote by phone, internet or by signing, dating, and returning the BLUE proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.
If you have any questions or require any assistance in voting your shares, please contact Brookdale's proxy solicitor,
ABOUT
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this communication may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and include all statements that are not historical statements of fact and those regarding the Company's intent, belief, or expectations. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "would," "on track," "potential," "intend," "enable," "expect," "endeavor," "seek," "anticipate," "estimate," "executing," "believe," "poised," "positioned," "project," "predict," "continue," "plan," "target," or other similar words or expressions, and include statements regarding the focus of the Board of Directors and management of the Company, the execution and advancement of the Company's strategy, the Company's CEO search process, the Company's ability to continue to successfully execute on key initiatives, deliver positive financial and operational performance and drive enhanced shareholder value. These forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and expectations, and the Company's ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Although the Company believes that expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its assumptions or expectations will be attained and actual results and performance could differ materially from those projected. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations and future prospects or which could cause events or circumstances to differ from the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, events which adversely affect the ability of seniors to afford resident fees, including downturns in the economy, housing market, consumer confidence, or the equity markets and unemployment among resident family members; the effects of senior housing construction and development, lower industry occupancy, and increased competition; conditions of housing markets, regulatory changes, acts of nature, and the effects of climate change in geographic areas where the Company is concentrated; terminations of the Company's resident agreements and vacancies in the living spaces it leases; changes in reimbursement rates, methods, or timing under governmental reimbursement programs including the Medicare and Medicaid programs; failure to maintain the security and functionality of the Company's information systems, to prevent a cybersecurity attack or breach, or to comply with applicable privacy and consumer protection laws, including HIPAA; the Company's ability to complete its capital expenditures in accordance with its plans; the Company's ability to identify and pursue development, investment, and acquisition opportunities and its ability to successfully integrate acquisitions; competition for the acquisition of assets; the Company's ability to complete pending or expected disposition, acquisition, or other transactions on agreed upon terms or at all, including in respect of the satisfaction of closing conditions, the risk that regulatory approvals are not obtained or are subject to unanticipated conditions, and uncertainties as to the timing of closing, and the Company's ability to identify and pursue any such opportunities in the future; risks related to the implementation of the Company's strategy, including initiatives undertaken to execute on the Company's strategic priorities and their effect on its results; any resurgence or variants of the COVID-19 pandemic; limits on the Company's ability to use net operating loss carryovers to reduce future tax payments; delays in obtaining regulatory approvals; the risks associated with tariffs and the uncertain duration of trade conflicts; disruptions in the financial markets or decreases in the appraised values or performance of the Company's communities that affect the Company's ability to obtain financing or extend or refinance debt as it matures and the Company's financing costs; the Company's ability to generate sufficient cash flow to cover required interest, principal, and long-term lease payments and to fund its planned capital projects; the effect of any non-compliance with any of the Company's debt or lease agreements (including the financial or other covenants contained therein), including the risk of lenders or lessors declaring a cross default in the event of the Company's non-compliance with any such agreements and the risk of loss of the Company's property securing leases and indebtedness due to any resulting lease terminations and foreclosure actions; the inability to renew, restructure, or extend leases, or exercise purchase options at or prior to the end of any existing lease term; the effect of the Company's indebtedness and long-term leases on the Company's liquidity and its ability to operate its business; increases in market interest rates that increase the costs of the Company's debt obligations; the Company's ability to obtain additional capital on terms acceptable to it; departures of key officers and potential disruption caused by changes in management; increased competition for, or a shortage of, associates, wage pressures resulting from increased competition, low unemployment levels, minimum wage increases and changes in overtime laws, and union activity; environmental contamination at any of the Company's communities; failure to comply with existing environmental laws; an adverse determination or resolution of complaints filed against the Company, including putative class action complaints; negative publicity with respect to any lawsuits, claims, or other legal or regulatory proceedings; costs to respond to, and adverse determinations resulting from, government inquiries, reviews, audits, and investigations; the cost and difficulty of complying with increasing and evolving regulation, including new disclosure obligations; changes in, or its failure to comply with, employment-related laws and regulations; the risks associated with current global economic conditions and general economic factors on the Company and the Company's business partners such as inflation, commodity costs, fuel and other energy costs, competition in the labor market, costs of salaries, wages, benefits, and insurance, interest rates, tax rates, tariffs, geopolitical tensions or conflicts, and uncertainty surrounding a new presidential administration, the impact of seasonal contagious illness or other contagious disease in the markets in which the Company operates; actions of activist stockholders, including as a result of the current proxy contest and any potential change of control of the Company or the Board; as well as other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's filings with the
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/brookdale-comments-on-iss-recommendation-302487808.html
SOURCE