BRAEMAR HOTELS & RESORTS ANNOUNCES INITIATION OF SALE PROCESS
The Board of Directors of the Company formed a Special Committee comprised solely of independent and disinterested directors to explore a range of strategic alternatives, aimed at maximizing both near- and long-term shareholder value. After reviewing various strategic options to maximize value for shareholders, the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to pursue a sale of the Company. Accordingly, the Company, together with its financial advisor,
Braemar's predominantly luxury hotel portfolio has consistently achieved the highest RevPAR among publicly traded lodging REITs, reflecting its strong market positioning. Luxury properties, like those in Braemar's portfolio, have historically led RevPAR growth due to their prime locations and limited competitive supply. The portfolio includes nine resort and five urban properties, operated under respected brands such as
The high-quality nature of the Company's portfolio has attracted multiple activist investors over the years. It is not believed that a luxury RevPAR lodging REIT like Braemar can flourish in today's market environment due to the historically low EBITDA multiple lodging REITs are achieving as well as the ongoing activism the Company has received. This same dynamic occurred with
In conjunction with this process, Braemar and its external advisor,
The most significant portion of the Company Sale Fee is calculated as a multiple of the net earnings of Ashford derived from the Advisory Agreement (the "Net Earnings"). In the Company's 2021 first quarter Form 10-Q, the Company reported Net Earnings of
Braemar Company Sale Fee Calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTM as of |
|
TTM as of |
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2021 (1) |
|
Q1 2025 |
|
|
|
|
Advisory Revenues* |
19.0 |
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
Advisory Expenses |
(10.5) |
|
(7.7) |
|
|
|
|
Advisory EBITDA |
8.5 |
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
|
Premier EBITDA |
1.0 |
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
INSPIRE EBITDA |
(0.0) |
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
RED EBITDA |
0.4 |
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
Lismore EBITDA |
3.4 |
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
Other EBITDA |
0.1 |
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
13.4 |
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Adjustments to Advisory Expenses |
|
|
(6.6) |
|
|
|
|
Implied Net Earnings |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed |
|
|
|
|
12x Multiple (2) |
161.0 |
|
385.3 |
|
|
|
|
20% Premium Owed at Termination (3) |
193.2 |
|
462.3 |
|
|
|
|
Uninvested Amount (4) |
31.1 |
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
224.3 |
|
480.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Advisory Revenues for TTM Q1 2025 can be found in Braemar's Form 10-K filed on |
|
||||||
10-Q filed on |
|
||||||
(1) As reported in Braemar's first quarter 2021 Form 10-Q filed on |
|
|
|||||
(2) Per the definition of Termination Fee in the Fifth Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement. |
|
|
|||||
(3) Per the definition of Adjusted Termination Fee and section 12.5.b in the Fifth Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement. |
|||||||
(4) Per section 12.5(b) of the Fifth Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement. |
|
|
|
|
Ashford received
Rebeca "Becky" Odino-Johnson, Chairperson of the Special Committee, said, "We explored multiple alternatives for Braemar including a potential internalization of management. However, given the sustained disconnect between our share price and our iconic portfolio's intrinsic real estate value, the Board believes pursuing a sale process is the right step at this time. The Board also believes that this is the best opportunity for shareholders to realize a premium to the existing share price." She continued, "The termination fee payable to Ashford upon a sale of the Company has increased considerably over the last few years as a result of the growth of the portfolio and the additional services Ashford provides to the Company and its hotels. She concluded, "As this process moves forward, we will remain focused on executing our business plan and generating optimal returns from our assets to deliver maximum value to shareholders in the context of the anticipated transaction."
Beyond the value of its hotels, Braemar also owns excess land at its
|
|
|
|
Hotel |
Location |
# of Rooms |
TTM NOI** |
|
|
559 |
15.0 |
The |
|
170 |
5.1 |
The |
|
180 |
14.5 |
The |
|
276 |
18.4 |
The |
Dorado, PR |
96 |
17.2 |
Four Seasons Resort Scottsdale at Troon North |
|
210 |
21.3 |
|
|
499 |
11.2 |
|
|
142 |
12.6 |
|
|
193 |
9.4 |
|
|
65 |
3.8 |
|
|
80 |
2.9 |
Sofitel Chicago Magnificent Mile |
|
415 |
4.6 |
TOTAL |
|
2,885 |
135.8 |
The Clancy |
|
410 |
5.2 |
|
|
143 |
(2.2) |
|
|
|
|
* Braemar has 75% ownership in this hotel. |
|
|
|
** As of |
|
|
|
(1) The Gross Asset Value of the |
|
The Company recently entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent with a potential buyer for the sale of the 410-room Clancy hotel in
There is no deadline or definitive timetable set for completion of the sale process and there can be no assurance that this process will result in a sale of the Company. Braemar does not expect to disclose or provide an update concerning developments related to this process unless and until the Board of Directors has approved a specific transaction or other course of action requiring disclosure, or the Company determines that a disclosure is required by law or otherwise deemed appropriate.
Braemar has engaged
* * * * *
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) TO HOTEL EBITDA AND NET OPERATING INCOME (in thousands) (unaudited) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
TTM Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Capital |
|
Sofitel |
|
Bardessono |
|
Pier |
|
Hotel |
|
Park |
|
The |
|
The |
|
The Ritz- |
|
The Ritz- |
|
The Ritz- |
|
Cameo |
|
The Ritz- |
|
Four |
Net income (loss) |
$ (9,147) |
|
$ 1,493 |
|
$ 797 |
|
$ 11,077 |
|
$ 1,057 |
|
$ 24 |
|
$ 7,803 |
|
$ 395 |
|
$ 14,330 |
|
$ (6,719) |
|
$ 9,029 |
|
|
|
$ 7,207 |
|
$ 924 |
Non-property adjustments |
131 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(50) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2,086 |
|
— |
|
866 |
|
— |
Interest income |
(183) |
|
(2) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(109) |
|
(270) |
|
(107) |
|
(403) |
|
(315) |
|
— |
|
(29) |
|
(224) |
Interest expense |
14,539 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
709 |
|
— |
|
5,380 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
588 |
|
4,034 |
|
710 |
|
— |
|
4,119 |
|
11,942 |
Amortization of loan cost |
329 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
217 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
141 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
525 |
|
980 |
Depreciation and amortization |
12,216 |
|
4,474 |
|
2,892 |
|
1,720 |
|
2,126 |
|
5,834 |
|
5,361 |
|
6,999 |
|
7,836 |
|
9,629 |
|
6,928 |
|
2,940 |
|
7,737 |
|
10,705 |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
37 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(25) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(444) |
|
— |
|
581 |
|
— |
Non-hotel EBITDA ownership |
318 |
|
100 |
|
885 |
|
123 |
|
240 |
|
46 |
|
72 |
|
13 |
|
156 |
|
1,081 |
|
10 |
|
918 |
|
43 |
|
9 |
|
18,240 |
|
6,065 |
|
4,574 |
|
13,846 |
|
3,423 |
|
11,234 |
|
13,102 |
|
7,137 |
|
22,803 |
|
7,763 |
|
18,004 |
|
(1,716) |
|
21,049 |
|
24,336 |
Less: EBITDA adjustments |
(4,561) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
Equity in earnings (loss) of |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
Company's portion of EBITDA |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ 13,679 |
|
$ 6,065 |
|
$ 4,574 |
|
$ 13,846 |
|
$ 3,423 |
|
$ 11,234 |
|
|
|
$ 7,137 |
|
$ 22,803 |
|
$ 7,763 |
|
$ 18,004 |
|
|
|
$ 21,049 |
|
$ 24,336 |
Comparable hotel EBITDA |
$ 18,240 |
|
$ 6,065 |
|
$ 4,574 |
|
$ 13,846 |
|
$ 3,423 |
|
$ 11,234 |
|
|
|
$ 7,137 |
|
$ 22,803 |
|
$ 7,763 |
|
$ 18,004 |
|
|
|
$ 21,049 |
|
$ 24,336 |
FFE Reserves |
(3,273) |
|
(1,497) |
|
(816) |
|
(1,211) |
|
(562) |
|
(1,846) |
|
(1,922) |
|
(1,916) |
|
(4,390) |
|
(2,673) |
|
(3,523) |
|
(512) |
|
(3,864) |
|
(3,013) |
Net operating income |
$ 14,967 |
|
$ 4,568 |
|
$ 3,758 |
|
$ 12,635 |
|
$ 2,861 |
|
$ 9,388 |
|
|
|
$ 5,221 |
|
$ 18,413 |
|
$ 5,090 |
|
$ 14,481 |
|
|
|
$ 17,185 |
|
$ 21,323 |
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/braemar-hotels--resorts-announces-initiation-of-sale-process-302539371.html
SOURCE