HEADWATER EXPLORATION INC. ANNOUNCES 2025 RESERVES, FOURTH QUARTER PRODUCTION RESULTS AND OPERATIONS UPDATE
Exceptional results across our asset base positioned Headwater for strong fourth quarter production volumes of approximately 24,250 boe/d and 2025 annual production volumes of approximately 22,750 boe/d, representing 12% year over year production per share growth. Adjusted funds flow from operations (1) is estimated to be approximately
During 2025, Headwater executed a capital expenditure program (3) of approximately
|
|
(1) |
Capital management measure. Refer to "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" within this press release. |
|
|
(2) |
Non-GAAP ratio. Refer to "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" within this press release. |
|
|
(3) |
Non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" within this press release. |
2025 RESERVE HIGHLIGHTS
Reserve additions for the year end 2025 were exceptional. Our continued success with our exploration efforts and secondary recovery implementation have resulted in the following positive changes to our evaluated reserves:
- Proved developed producing reserves increased by 53% to 44.5 mmboe from 29.2 mmboe, resulting in production replacement (1) of 285% and a reserves life index ("RLI") (1) of 5.0 years.
- Total proved reserves increased by 59% to 68.3 mmboe from 43.1 mmboe, resulting in production replacement of 403% and a RLI of 7.6 years.
- Total proved plus probable reserves increased by 54% to 104.5 mmboe from 67.9 mmboe, resulting in production replacement of 541% and a RLI of 11.7 years.
- Achieved finding and development ("F&D") costs (2), including changes in future development capital of
$9.65 per boe on a proved developed producing basis,$11.04 per boe on a total proved basis and$9.97 per boe on a total proved plus probable basis. - Based on a 2025 adjusted funds flow netback (2) of
$39.25 /boe, Headwater achieved recycle ratios (2) of 4.1 on a proved developed producing basis, 3.6 on a total proved basis and 3.9 on a total proved plus probable basis.
|
|
(1) |
Oil and gas metric that does not have any standardized meaning under the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (the "COGE Handbook") or under National Instrument 51-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities ("NI 51-101") and therefore may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures of other entities. Refer to "Oil and Gas Metrics" within this press release. |
|
|
(2) |
Non-GAAP ratio and oil and gas metric that does not have any standardized meaning under IFRS, the COGE Handbook or under NI 51-101 and therefore may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures of other entities. Refer to "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" and "Oil and Gas Metrics" within this press release. |
OPERATIONS UPDATE
Grand Rapids Formation in
Results from the
In the fourth quarter of 2025, Headwater drilled a 3-mile step-out to the northwest at 03/13-22-075-02W5. This 6-leg well which continues to improve, has achieved a 15-day initial production rate of 300 bbls/d of 19 API oil. The excellent reservoir quality encountered while drilling inspired the team to immediately follow-up with an injection well, which will be placed on injection in
Greater Pelican Area
In the fourth quarter of 2025, Headwater drilled two development wells following up on the successful 04/04-19-079-22W4 well, which produced 120,000 bbls of oil in its first eight months. The two 4-leg lateral wells at 03/14-31-079-22W4 and 03/3-19-079-22W4 have achieved 30-day initial production rates of 382 and 470 bbls/d, respectively. Polymer injection wells were drilled to support these producers, and they have been on polymer injection at encouraging rates since mid-December.
A 6-leg Wabiskaw exploration test was drilled at 13-34-079-23W4. The well encountered excellent reservoir while drilling, however it also encountered a structural low at the toes of its laterals. The 30-day initial production rate of this well is 80 bbls/d of oil at a 70% water cut. Although this is an economic result, the higher water cut resulted in some adjustments to our geotechnical model. To validate the revised model, a follow-up single lateral well was drilled immediately offsetting the original well and was stopped short of the structural low. This 3/4 length single lateral well has achieved a 20-day initial production rate of 37 bbls/d, which is consistent with the inflow, on a per meter basis, of our other successful Wabiskaw drills.
Production from the Greater Pelican has grown to 1,500 bbls/d, with more than 850 bbls/d supported by secondary recovery. With encouraging early results from the polymer flood, Headwater is enthusiastic about advancing additional polymer flood development in 2026, as well as drilling 2-3 untested exploration prospects.
Secondary Recovery
Headwater finished 2025 with a total of 10 sections and 11,500 bbls/d supported by secondary recovery, representing more than 50% of the Company's oil production. Headwater has proved commerciality of secondary recovery across multiple formations including the
By year end 2026, it is estimated that 14,000 bbls/d, equivalent to 60% of Headwater's corporate oil production, will be supported by secondary recovery.
Our unwavering commitment to the implementation of secondary recovery continues to result in industry leading sustainability and asset duration. With the continued focus on secondary recovery, we anticipate that we will exit 2026 with a decline rate of less than 20% and maintenance capital of less than 30% of adjusted funds flow from operations at
2025 RESERVES INFORMATION
Headwater currently has reserves primarily located in the greater
The following tables are a summary of Headwater's petroleum and natural gas reserves, as evaluated by McDaniel, effective
Reserves Summary
|
|
Heavy |
Shale |
Conventional |
|
Oil |
|
|
Oil |
Gas |
Natural Gas |
NGL |
Equivalent |
|
|
Mbbls |
MMcf |
MMcf |
Mbbls |
MBOE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed producing |
40,734 |
719 |
21,035 |
166 |
44,526 |
|
Proved developed non-producing |
268 |
1,498 |
17 |
2 |
523 |
|
Proved undeveloped |
22,455 |
- |
4,203 |
74 |
23,229 |
|
Total proved |
63,458 |
2,217 |
25,255 |
242 |
68,278 |
|
Total probable |
34,272 |
681 |
10,263 |
131 |
36,227 |
|
Total proved plus probable |
97,730 |
2,898 |
35,518 |
372 |
104,505 |
|
|
(1) |
Reserves have been presented on a gross basis which are the Company's total working interest share before the deduction of any royalties and without including any royalty interests of the Company. |
|
|
(2) |
Based on the average of |
|
|
(3) |
Pursuant to the COGE Handbook, reported reserves should target at least a 90 percent probability that the quantities actually recovered will be equal to or exceed the estimated proved reserves and that at least a 50 percent probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves. |
Future Development Costs ("FDC")
The following is a summary of the estimated FDC required to bring proved undeveloped reserves and proved plus probable undeveloped reserves on production.
|
|
Proved Reserves $M |
Proved Plus Probable Reserves $M |
|
2026 |
122,950 |
141,850 |
|
2027 |
144,520 |
146,048 |
|
2028 |
121,163 |
162,800 |
|
2029 |
12,544 |
136,977 |
|
Total Undiscounted |
401,177 |
587,674 |
Net Present Value of Future Net Revenue
|
|
Before Income Tax and Discounted at |
After Income Tax and Discounted at |
||||||||
|
|
0 % |
5 % |
10 % |
15 % |
20 % |
0 % |
5 % |
10 % |
15 % |
20 % |
|
|
$M |
$M |
$M |
$M |
$M |
$M |
$M |
$M |
$M |
$M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed producing |
1,580,469 |
1,300,038 |
1,094,813 |
948,758 |
840,512 |
1,308,397 |
1,085,217 |
917,035 |
796,776 |
707,466 |
|
Proved developed non-producing |
22,085 |
18,085 |
15,045 |
12,732 |
10,937 |
16,475 |
13,596 |
11,340 |
9,605 |
8,252 |
|
Proved undeveloped |
564,417 |
435,380 |
339,626 |
267,516 |
212,359 |
434,931 |
326,944 |
247,782 |
188,757 |
144,004 |
|
Total proved |
2,166,971 |
1,753,503 |
1,449,485 |
1,229,007 |
1,063,808 |
1,759,803 |
1,425,757 |
1,176,158 |
995,138 |
859,722 |
|
Total probable |
1,396,109 |
936,584 |
684,811 |
526,684 |
419,304 |
1,075,014 |
716,912 |
521,132 |
398,502 |
315,479 |
|
Total proved plus probable |
3,563,080 |
2,690,087 |
2,134,296 |
1,755,691 |
1,483,111 |
2,834,817 |
2,142,669 |
1,697,291 |
1,393,641 |
1,175,202 |
|
|
(1) |
Based on the average of |
|
|
(2) |
All future net revenues are stated prior to provision for interest income and other, general and administrative expenses and after deduction of royalties, operating costs, estimated well and facility abandonment and reclamation costs and estimated future capital expenditures. |
|
|
(3) |
After-income tax net present value of future net revenue are based on Headwater's estimated tax pools as at |
Pricing Assumptions
The following tables set forth the benchmark reference prices, as at
SUMMARY OF PRICING AND INFLATION RATE ASSUMPTIONS
as of
FORECAST PRICES AND COSTS
|
Year |
WTI Crude Oil ($US/Bbl) |
Light Crude 40o API ($Cdn/Bbl) |
WCS ($Cdn/Bbl) |
NYMEX Henry Hub ($US/ MMBtu) |
Natural Gas AECO Spot ($Cdn/ MMBtu) |
AGT
Premium to ($Cdn/MMbtu) |
Price(2) ($Cdn/ MMbtu) |
Inflation Rates %/Year |
Exchange Rate (3) ($US/$Cdn) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026 |
59.92 |
77.54 |
65.13 |
3.74 |
3.00 |
9.38 |
16.14 |
- |
0.73 |
|
2027 |
65.10 |
83.60 |
70.43 |
3.78 |
3.30 |
9.25 |
15.31 |
2.00 |
0.74 |
|
2028 |
70.28 |
90.17 |
76.90 |
3.85 |
3.49 |
8.87 |
15.07 |
2.00 |
0.74 |
|
2029 |
71.93 |
92.32 |
78.71 |
3.93 |
3.58 |
8.98 |
9.31 |
2.00 |
0.74 |
|
2030 |
73.37 |
94.17 |
80.29 |
4.01 |
3.65 |
9.08 |
9.08 |
2.00 |
0.74 |
|
2031 |
74.84 |
96.06 |
81.90 |
4.09 |
3.72 |
9.19 |
9.19 |
2.00 |
0.74 |
|
2032 |
76.34 |
97.98 |
83.53 |
4.17 |
3.80 |
9.30 |
9.30 |
2.00 |
0.74 |
|
2033 |
77.87 |
99.93 |
85.20 |
4.26 |
3.88 |
9.41 |
9.41 |
2.00 |
0.74 |
|
2034 |
79.42 |
101.93 |
86.91 |
4.34 |
3.95 |
9.53 |
9.53 |
2.00 |
0.74 |
|
2035 |
81.01 |
103.97 |
88.65 |
4.43 |
4.03 |
9.64 |
9.64 |
2.00 |
0.74 |
|
2036 |
82.63 |
106.05 |
90.42 |
4.52 |
4.11 |
9.76 |
9.76 |
2.00 |
0.74 |
|
Thereafter |
+2%/yr |
+2%/yr |
+2%/yr |
+2%yr |
+2%/yr |
+2%/yr |
+2%/yr |
2.00 |
0.74 |
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Not a published forecast. McDaniel's estimate of the AGT premium to |
|
|
(2) |
The forecast McCully gas price is used by McDaniel in calculating the net present value of Headwater's future natural gas net revenues from the McCully Field. The McCully gas price is determined by adjusting the forecast AGT gas prices to reflect the expected premiums received at Headwater's delivery point, transportation costs, as applicable, heat content and marketing conditions. The McCully gas price in years 2026 – 2028 reflects only the winter producing months (January to April and December) to correlate to the intermittent production strategy employed by the Company to capture seasonal premium pricing. After 2028, the McDaniel Report assumes Headwater produces volumes from its reserves continuously over the year and as such, McCully pricing reflects the full year. |
|
|
(3) |
The exchange rate used to generate the benchmark reference prices in this table. |
Additional corporate information can be found in the Company's corporate presentation and on Headwater's website at www.headwaterexp.com.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS: This press release contains forward-looking statements. The use of any of the words "guidance", "initial, "anticipate", "scheduled", "can", "will", "prior to", "estimate", "believe", "potential", "should", "unaudited", "forecast", "future", "continue", "may", "expect", "project", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein, include, without limitation; the expectation that 750 bbls/d will be supported under waterflood by
BARRELS OF OIL AND CUBIC FEET OF NATURAL GAS EQUIVALENT: The term "boe" (or barrels of oil equivalent) and "Mcf" (or thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalent) may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe and Mcf conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent (6 Mcf: 1 bbl) is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Additionally, given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil, as compared to natural gas, is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1; utilizing a conversion ratio of 6:1 may be misleading as an indication of value.
INITIAL PRODUCTION RATES: References in this press release to initial production ("IP") rates, other short-term production rates or initial performance measures relating to new wells are useful in confirming the presence of hydrocarbons; however, such rates are not determinative of the rates at which such wells will commence production and decline thereafter and are not indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery. All IP rates presented herein represent the results from wells after all "load" fluids (used in well completion stimulation) have been recovered. While encouraging, readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in calculating the aggregate production for the Company. Accordingly, the Company cautions that the test results should be considered to be preliminary.
PRODUCTION VOLUMES: With respect to the 2025 average fourth quarter production volumes presented herein, such volumes are comprised of: 22,100 bbls/d of heavy oil, 140 bbls/d of natural gas liquids and 12.1 mmcf/d of natural gas. With respect to the 2025 full-year average production volumes presented herein, such volumes are comprised of: 20,700 bbls/d of heavy oil, 160 bbls/d of natural gas liquids and 11.4 mmcf/d of natural gas.
NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this press release, we refer to certain financial measures which do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. Our determinations of these measures may not be comparable with calculations of similar measures for other issuers. In addition, this press release contains the term adjusted funds flow from operations, which is considered a capital management measure. Non-GAAP and other financial measures within this press release are calculated consistently with the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2025 reconciliations as outlined below.
Capital expenditures
Management utilizes capital expenditures to measure total cash capital expenditures incurred in the period. Capital expenditures represents capital expenditures – exploration and evaluation and capital expenditures – property, plant and equipment in the statement of cash flows in the Company's interim financial statements.
|
|
Three months ended
|
Nine months ended
|
||
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
(thousands of dollars) |
(thousands of dollars) |
||
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
62,881 |
63,136 |
166,765 |
180,920 |
|
Proceeds from government grant |
- |
- |
- |
354 |
|
Change in non-cash working capital |
5,790 |
(4,940) |
15,457 |
(7,094) |
|
Capital expenditures |
68,671 |
58,196 |
182,222 |
174,180 |
Capital Management Measures
Adjusted Funds Flow from Operations
Management considers adjusted funds flow from operations to be a key measure to assess the Company's management of capital. In addition to being a capital management measure, adjusted funds flow from operations is used by management to assess the performance of the Company's oil and gas properties. Adjusted funds flow from operations is an indicator of operating performance as it varies in response to production levels and management of production and transportation costs. Management believes that by eliminating changes in non-cash working capital and restricted cash and deducting current income taxes, adjusted funds flow from operations is a useful measure of operating performance.
|
|
Three months ended
|
Nine months ended
|
||
|
|
2025 |
2024 |
2025 |
2024 |
|
|
(thousands of dollars) |
(thousands of dollars) |
||
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
85,861 |
95,272 |
224,469 |
240,721 |
|
Changes in non-cash working capital |
(5,181) |
(9,092) |
5,829 |
(2,678) |
|
Current income taxes |
(10,591) |
(12,223) |
(31,044) |
(38,848) |
|
Current income taxes paid |
10,305 |
10,228 |
45,717 |
49,459 |
|
Restricted cash |
- |
- |
2,000 |
- |
|
Adjusted funds flow from operations |
80,394 |
84,185 |
246,971 |
248,654 |
Non-GAAP Ratios
This press release contains the terms adjusted funds flow netback, F&D costs per boe and recycle ratio, which are considered non-GAAP ratios and may also be considered oil and gas metrics. Our determinations of these measures may not be comparable with calculations of similar measures for other issuers.
Adjusted funds flow netback
Adjusted funds flow netback is a non-GAAP ratio and is used by management to better analyze the Company's performance against prior periods on a more comparable basis. Adjusted funds flow netback is defined as adjusted funds flow from operations divided by sales volumes in the period.
F&D costs per boe
F&D costs is used as a measure of capital efficiency. The F&D cost calculation includes all capital expenditure (exploration and development) for that period plus the change in future development capital ("FDC") for that period based on the evaluations completed by McDaniel as at
Recycle ratio
Recycle ratio is used as a measure of profitability. Recycle ratio is calculated as the Company's adjusted funds flow netback divided by F&D costs per boe.
Oil and Gas Metrics
This press release contains the terms adjusted funds flow netback, RLI, production replacement, F&D costs per boe and recycle ratio, which are considered oil and gas metrics that do not have standardized meanings under the COGE Handbook or under NI 51-101. Our determinations of these measures may not be comparable with calculations of similar measures for other issuers. For information related to adjusted funds flow netback, F&D costs per BOE and recycle ratio see "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures".
Reserve life index ("RLI") (years)
RLI is a measure of how long a particular category of reserves will last (in years) at the current rate of production. It is calculated by taking the total quantity of reserves (boe) divided by annualized Q4 2025 production (boe/d).
Production replacement
Production replacement measures how much annual production has been replaced by new reserve additions. It is calculated by taking the total change in reserves (boe) divided by 2025 annual production (boe).
SOURCE