Morgan Stanley Sustainable Signals: Companies Continue Executing Sustainability Strategies But Progress Has Slowed, According to New Survey
- Over 90% of corporate decision-makers continue to advance sustainability strategies, yet fewer believe they are meeting or exceeding expectations
- Majority of respondents see sustainability as both a value creation and risk management exercise for their company
- Macroeconomic uncertainty and regulatory compliance rise significantly as factors compared to previous years
- 78% anticipate negative operational impacts from physical climate risks in next five years, up 10% from 2025
When asked how sustainability impacts their long-term corporate strategies, 62% now see it as both a value creation and risk management exercise compared to 35% in 2025. Simultaneously, there has been a 31 point decrease in companies viewing sustainability primarily as a value creation opportunity (22% in 2026 versus 53% in 2025).
The external environment poses a greater challenge to corporate sustainability in 2026, with 36% citing macroeconomic uncertainty as a top barrier, up from 15% in 2025. High levels of investment required (39%) and lack of data (30%) rank as the other top barriers. External factors also top the list of reasons why companies are pursuing sustainability strategies, with regulatory compliance and investor expectations both cited as stronger motivators (49% versus 23%, and 42% versus 21%). Value creation remains the other top reason.
“Our Sustainable Signals survey shows that corporates around the world continue to see the value of sustainability, but their motivations and concerns have shifted amid a complex operating environment,” said
Additional survey findings include:
- Opportunities – Over 50% of respondents see higher revenue growth or increased profitability as the primary way sustainability can create value for their organizations in the next five years. While more companies (14% versus 10%) report greater challenges in measuring ROI for sustainability investments, the majority (73%) continue to say they can achieve this as easily as they can for other activities.
- Climate Risk – On average, 78% of respondents anticipate negative operational impacts from physical climate risks in the next five years (up from 65%), including increased costs, higher investment requirements and greater investor scrutiny. The same percentage say they are prepared to meet these challenges, though just 19% feel “very prepared” (down from 34%).
- Corporate Governance – 63% of respondents say that key business decisions – such as capex and R&D budgeting, new product approvals or M&A – are subject to sustainability criteria (up from 51%). Around the same proportion (62%) report Board-level responsibility for sustainability (up from 42%). Most corporate sustainability decision-makers (90%) have broader roles, with their work reaching across functions including strategy, risk management or finance. 15% also contribute to their organizations’ AI governance.
The Sustainable Signals series was launched in 2015 and measures the views of individual investors, institutional investors and corporates on sustainable investing. View the full results of the latest survey, including regional findings, here.
About
About
Disclosures
This material was published in
Past performance is not a guarantee or indicative of future performance. Historical data shown represents past performance and does not guarantee comparable future results. Certain statements herein may be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not historical facts or statements of current conditions, but instead are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. These statements are not guarantees of future results or occurrences and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and are often beyond our control. In addition, this report contains statements based on hypothetical scenarios and assumptions, which may not occur or differ significantly from actual events, and these statements should not necessarily be viewed as being representative of current or actual risk or forecasts of expected risk. Actual results and financial conditions may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors. Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of
Certain portfolios may include investment holdings deemed Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) investments. For reference, environmental (“E”) factors can include, but are not limited to, climate change, pollution, waste, and how an issuer protects and/ or conserves natural resources. Social (“S”) factors can include, but not are not limited to, how an issuer manages its relationships with individuals, such as its employees, shareholders, and customers as well as its community. Governance (“G”) factors can include, but are not limited to, how an issuer operates, such as its leadership composition, pay and incentive structures, internal controls, and the rights of equity and debt holders. You should carefully review an investment product’s prospectus or other offering documents, disclosures and/or marketing material to learn more about how it incorporates ESG factors into its investment strategy.
ESG investments may also be referred to as Sustainable investments, impact aware investments, socially responsible investments or diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) investments. It is important to understand there are inconsistent ESG definitions and criteria within the industry, as well as multiple ESG ratings providers that provide ESG ratings of the same subject companies and/or securities that vary among the providers. This is due to a current lack of consistent global reporting and auditing standards as well as differences in definitions, methodologies, processes, data sources and subjectivity among ESG rating providers when determining a rating. Certain issuers of investments including, but not limited to, separately managed accounts (SMAs), mutual funds and exchange traded-funds (ETFs) may have differing and inconsistent views concerning ESG criteria where the ESG claims made in offering documents or other literature may overstate ESG impact. Further, socially responsible norms vary by region, and an issuer’s ESG practices or Morgan Stanley’s assessment of an issuer’s ESG practices can change over time.
Portfolios that include investment holdings deemed ESG investments or that employ ESG screening criteria as part of an overall strategy may experience performance that is lower or higher than a portfolio not employing such practices. Portfolios with ESG restrictions and strategies as well as ESG investments may not be able to take advantage of the same opportunities or market trends as portfolios where ESG criteria is not applied. There is no assurance that an ESG investing strategy or techniques employed will be successful. Past performance is not a guarantee or a dependable measure of future results. For risks related to a specific fund, please refer to the fund’s prospectus or summary prospectus.
Investment managers can have different approaches to ESG and can offer strategies that differ from the strategies offered by other investment managers with respect to the same theme or topic. Additionally, when evaluating investments, an investment manager is dependent upon information and data that may be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable, which could cause the manager to incorrectly assess an investment’s ESG characteristics or performance. Such data or information may be obtained through voluntary or third-party reporting.
The appropriateness of a particular ESG investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. Principal value and return of an investment will fluctuate with changes in market conditions.
© 2026
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260508123262/en/
Media Relations Contact:
Carrie.Hall@morganstanley.com
Source: