U.S. FDA Approval of RYBREVANT FASPRO™ (amivantamab and hyaluronidase-lpuj) Enables the Simplest, Shortest Administration Time for a First-Line Combination Regimen when Combined with LAZCLUZE® (lazertinib)
RYBREVANT
Approval builds on previously reported Phase 3 MARIPOSA data showing unmatched overall survival benefit of this chemotherapy-free regimen, projected to exceed four years6
Experience the full interactive Multichannel News Release here: https://www.multivu.com/johnson-and-johnson/9361151-en-johnson-and-johnson-us-fda-approval-rybrevant-faspro-amivantamab-and-hyaluronidase-lpuj
Compared to intravenous (IV) delivery, RYBREVANT
- Reducing administration time from several hours to five minutes (significantly less administration time than chemotherapy-based regimens, which could take up to an hour);
- Demonstrating an approximately fivefold reduction in administration-related reactions (ARRs) (13 percent in SC vs 66 percent in IV arm); and
- Reducing venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence (11 percent in SC vs 18 percent in IV arm).
Multimedia assets for media are available here .
Based on the results from the Phase 3 PALOMA-3 study (NCT05388669), RYBREVANT
Data presented at ASCO in 2024 and published in the
"Patients now have a simple, chemotherapy-free frontline option that not only targets the disease more precisely but also significantly improves survival," said
This milestone builds upon the statistically significant and clinically meaningful OS data demonstrated with RYBREVANT® plus LAZCLUZE® for patients with untreated (first-line) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletions (ex19del) or L858R substitution mutations in the Phase 3 MARIPOSA study. At a median follow-up of 37.8 months, RYBREVANT® plus LAZCLUZE® showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of death compared to osimertinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.92, P=0.0048). Median OS was not yet reached with the combination (95 percent CI, 42.9-not estimable) and the OS benefit is projected to exceed four years, which is at least one year beyond the median of three years observed with osimertinib (36.7 months; 95 percent CI, 33.4-41.0).6
"The combination of RYBREVANT plus LAZCLUZE changes the biology of the disease by preventing resistance and delivers unmatched overall survival in the first-line setting, while omitting chemotherapy from treatment," said
"The approval of RYBREVANT
Lower rates of ARRs (13 percent vs. 66 percent) were observed with RYBREVANT
Overall, the safety profile of RYBREVANT
Access to RYBREVANT
About the PALOMA-3 Study
PALOMA-3 (NCT05388669), which enrolled 418 patients, is a randomized, open-label Phase 3 study evaluating the PK, efficacy and safety of RYBREVANT
About the MARIPOSA Study
MARIPOSA (NCT04487080), which enrolled 1,074 patients, is a randomized, Phase 3 study evaluating RYBREVANT® plus LAZCLUZE® versus osimertinib and versus LAZCLUZE® alone in first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR ex19del or substitution mutations. The primary endpoint of the study is PFS (using RECIST v1.1 guidelines) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Secondary endpoints include OS, ORR, DoR, progression-free survival after first subsequent therapy (PFS2) and intracranial PFS.9
Resistance to third-generation TKIs, such as osimertinib (when given alone or with chemotherapy), remains a major barrier to long-term disease control.10 The combination regimen RYBREVANT® plus LAZCLUZE® uses a triple mode of action: targeting EGFR mutations from two angles, blocking MET, and engaging the immune system.6 This approach has the potential to change the natural history of the disease by reducing the spectrum and complexity of acquired resistance mechanisms.12
A new analysis from MARIPOSA, presented at the
About RYBREVANT®
RYBREVANT® (amivantamab-vmjw) is a first-in-class, fully-human bispecific antibody targeting EGFR and MET with immune cell-directing activity.
Data across multiple Phase 3 studies, including MARIPOSA and PALOMA-3, have demonstrated the clinical benefit of RYBREVANT® -based regimens in improving PFS and
RYBREVANT® is approved in the
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®)§[1] include amivantamab-vmjw (RYBREVANT®) across multiple treatment settings, including its recent inclusion as a NCCN Category 1 preferred option when used with lazertinib (LAZCLUZE®) for first-line treatment of people with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations; see the latest NCCN Guidelines® for NSCLC for complete information.‖¶
The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System Cancers also identify amivantamab-vmjw (RYBREVANT®)-based regimens, including the combination with lazertinib (LAZCLUZE®), as the only NCCN-preferred combination options for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and brain metastases.‖¶
RYBREVANT FASPRO™ is co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20),
For more information, visit: https://www.RYBREVANT.com.
About LAZCLUZE
®
In 2018,
About Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Worldwide, lung cancer is one of the most common cancers, with NSCLC making up 80 to 85 percent of all lung cancer cases.13,14 The main subtypes of NSCLC are adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma.14 Among the most common driver mutations in NSCLC are alterations in EGFR, which is a receptor tyrosine kinase controlling cell growth and division.15 EGFR mutations are present in 10 to 15 percent of Western patients with NSCLC with adenocarcinoma histology and occur in 40 to 50 percent of Asian patients.15,16,17,18 EGFR exon 19 deletions or EGFR L858R mutations are the most common EGFR mutations.19,20 The five-year survival rate for all people with advanced NSCLC and EGFR mutations treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is less than 20 percent.21 EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations are the third most prevalent activating EGFR mutation.22 Patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations have a real-world five-year overall survival (OS) of eight percent in the frontline setting, which is worse than patients with EGFR exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations,
About EGFR Mutations
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are among the most common oncogenic drivers in NSCLC, especially in, younger individuals and those
INDICATIONS
RYBREVANT
- in combination with LAZCLUZE® (lazertinib) for the first-line treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R substitution mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test.
- in combination with carboplatin and pemetrexed for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R substitution mutations, whose disease has progressed on or after treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
- in combination with carboplatin and pemetrexed for the first-line treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test.
- as a single agent for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, as detected by an FDA approved test, whose disease has progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
CONTRAINDICATIONS
RYBREVANT
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
Hypersensitivity and Administration-Related Reactions with RYBREVANT
RYBREVANT
RYBREVANT FASPRO™ with LAZCLUZE®
In PALOMA-3 (n=206), all Grade ARRs occurred in 13% of patients, including 0.5% Grade 3. Of the patients
Premedicate with antihistamines, antipyretics, and glucocorticoids and administer
RYBREVANT
Infusion-Related Reactions with RYBREVANT ®
RYBREVANT® can cause infusion-related reactions (IRR) including anaphylaxis; signs and symptoms of IRR include dyspnea, flushing, fever, chills, nausea, chest discomfort, hypotension, and vomiting. The median time to IRR onset is approximately 1 hour.
RYBREVANT ® with LAZCLUZE ®
In MARIPOSA (n=421), IRRs occurred in 63% of patients, including Grade 3 in 5% and Grade 4 in 1% of patients. IRR-related infusion modifications occurred in 54%, dose reduction in 0.7%, and permanent discontinuation of RYBREVANT® in 4.5% of patients.
RYBREVANT ® with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed
Based on the pooled safety population (n=281), IRRs occurred in 50% of patients including Grade 3 (3.2%) adverse reactions. IRR-related infusion modifications occurred in 46%, and permanent discontinuation of RYBREVANT® in 2.8% of patients.
RYBREVANT ® as a Single Agent
In CHRYSALIS (n=302), IRRs occurred in 66% of patients. IRRs occurred in 65% of patients on Week 1 Day 1, 3.4% on Day 2 infusion, 0.4% with Week 2 infusion, and were cumulatively 1.1% with subsequent infusions. 97% were Grade 1-2, 2.2% were Grade 3, and 0.4% were Grade 4. The median time to onset was 1 hour (range: 0.1 to 18 hours) after start of infusion. IRR-related infusion modifications occurred in 62%, and permanent discontinuation of RYBREVANT® in 1.3% of patients.
Premedicate with antihistamines, antipyretics, and glucocorticoids and infuse RYBREVANT® as recommended. Administer RYBREVANT® via a peripheral line on Week 1 and Week 2 to reduce the risk of IRRs. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of IRRs in a setting where cardiopulmonary resuscitation medication and equipment are available. Interrupt infusion if IRR is suspected. Reduce the infusion rate or permanently discontinue RYBREVANT® based on severity. If an anaphylactic reaction occurs, permanently discontinue RYBREVANT®.
Interstitial Lung Disease/Pneumonitis
RYBREVANT
RYBREVANT FASPRO™ with LAZCLUZE®
In PALOMA-3, ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 6% of patients, including Grade 3 in 1%, Grade 4 in 1.5%, and fatal cases in 1.9% of patients. 5% of patients permanently discontinued
RYBREVANT
RYBREVANT ® with LAZCLUZE ®
In MARIPOSA, ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 3.1% of patients, including Grade 3 in 1.0% and Grade 4 in 0.2% of patients. There was one fatal case of ILD/pneumonitis and 2.9% of patients permanently discontinued RYBREVANT® and LAZCLUZE® due to ILD/pneumonitis.
RYBREVANT ® with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed
Based on the pooled safety population, ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 2.1% of patients with 1.8% of patients experiencing Grade 3 ILD/pneumonitis. 2.1% discontinued RYBREVANT® due to ILD/pneumonitis.
RYBREVANT ® as a Single Agent
In CHRYSALIS, ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 3.3% of patients, with 0.7% of patients experiencing Grade 3 ILD/pneumonitis. Three patients (1%) permanently discontinued RYBREVANT® due to ILD/pneumonitis.
Monitor patients for new or worsening symptoms indicative of ILD/pneumonitis (e.g., dyspnea, cough, fever). Immediately withhold RYBREVANT
Venous Thromboembolic (VTE) Events with Concomitant Use with LAZCLUZE ®
RYBREVANT
RYBREVANT FASPRO™ with LAZCLUZE®
In PALOMA-3 (n=206), all Grade VTE occurred in 11% of patients and 1.5% were Grade 3. 80% (n=164) of patients received prophylactic anticoagulation at study entry, with an all Grade VTE incidence of 7%. In patients
RYBREVANT ® with LAZCLUZE ®
In MARIPOSA, VTEs occurred in 36% of patients including Grade 3 in 10% and Grade 4 in 0.5% of patients. On-study VTEs occurred in 1.2% of patients (n=5) while receiving anticoagulation therapy. There were two fatal cases of VTE (0.5%), 9% of patients had VTE leading to dose interruptions of RYBREVANT®, and 7% of patients had VTE leading to dose interruptions of LAZCLUZE®; 1% of patients had VTE leading to dose reductions of RYBREVANT®, and 0.5% of patients had VTE leading to dose reductions of LAZCLUZE®; 3.1% of patients had VTE leading to permanent discontinuation of RYBREVANT®, and 1.9% of patients had VTE leading to permanent discontinuation of LAZCLUZE®. The median time to onset of VTEs was 84 days (range: 6 to 777).
Administer prophylactic anticoagulation for the first four months of treatment. The use of Vitamin K antagonists is not recommended.
Monitor for signs and symptoms of VTE events and treat as medically appropriate. Withhold RYBREVANT
Dermatologic Adverse Reactions
RYBREVANT
RYBREVANT FASPRO™ with LAZCLUZE®
In PALOMA-3, rash occurred in 80% of patients, including Grade 3 in 17% and Grade 4 in 0.5% of patients. Rash leading to dose reduction occurred in 11% of patients, and
RYBREVANT
RYBREVANT ® with LAZCLUZE ®
In MARIPOSA, rash occurred in 86% of patients, including Grade 3 in 26% of patients. The median time to onset of rash was 14 days (range: 1 to 556 days). Rash leading to dose interruptions occurred in 37% of patients for RYBREVANT® and 30% for LAZCLUZE®, rash leading to dose reductions occurred in 23% of patients for RYBREVANT® and 19% for LAZCLUZE®, and rash leading to permanent discontinuation occurred in 5% of patients for RYBREVANT® and 1.7% for LAZCLUZE®.
RYBREVANT ® with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed
Based on the pooled safety population, rash occurred in 82% of patients, including Grade 3 (15%) adverse reactions. Rash leading to dose reductions occurred in 14% of patients, and 2.5% permanently discontinued RYBREVANT® and 3.1% discontinued pemetrexed.
RYBREVANT ® as a Single Agent
In CHRYSALIS, rash occurred in 74% of patients, including Grade 3 in 3.3% of patients. The median time to onset of rash was 14 days (range: 1 to 276 days). Rash leading to dose reduction occurred in 5% and permanent discontinuation due to rash occurred in 0.7% of patients. Toxic epidermal necrolysis occurred in one patient (0.3%).
When initiating treatment with RYBREVANT
If skin reactions develop, administer supportive care including topical corticosteroids and topical and/or oral antibiotics. For Grade 3 reactions, add oral steroids and consider dermatologic consultation. Promptly refer patients presenting with severe rash, atypical appearance or distribution, or lack of improvement within 2 weeks to a dermatologist. For patients receiving RYBREVANT
Ocular Toxicity
RYBREVANT
RYBREVANT FASPRO™ with LAZCLUZE®
In PALOMA-3, all Grade ocular toxicity occurred in 13% of patients, including 0.5% Grade 3.
RYBREVANT ® with LAZCLUZE ®
In MARIPOSA, ocular toxicity occurred in 16%, including Grade 3 or 4 ocular toxicity in 0.7% of patients. Withhold, reduce the dose, or permanently discontinue RYBREVANT® and continue LAZCLUZE® based on severity.
RYBREVANT ® with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed
Based on the pooled safety population, ocular toxicity occurred in 16% of patients. All events were Grade 1 or 2.
RYBREVANT ® as a Single Agent
In CHRYSALIS, keratitis occurred in 0.7% and uveitis occurred in 0.3% of patients. All events were Grade 1-2.
Promptly refer patients presenting with new or worsening eye symptoms to an ophthalmologist. Withhold, dose reduce or permanently discontinue RYBREVANT
Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
Based on animal models, RYBREVANT
ADVERSE REACTIONS
RYBREVANT FASPRO™ withLAZCLUZE®
In PALOMA-3 (n=206), the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were rash (80%), nail toxicity (58%), musculoskeletal pain (50%), fatigue (37%), stomatitis (36%), edema (34%), nausea (30%), diarrhea (22%), vomiting (22%), constipation (22%), decreased appetite (22%), and headache (21%). The most common Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities (≥2%) were decreased lymphocyte count (6%), decreased sodium (5%), decreased potassium (5%), decreased albumin (4.9%), increased alanine aminotransferase (3.4%), decreased platelet count (2.4%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (2%), increased gamma-glutamyl transferase (2%), and decreased hemoglobin (2%).
Serious adverse reactions occurred in 33% of patients, with those occurring in ≥2% of patients including ILD/pneumonitis (6%); and pneumonia, VTE and fatigue (2.4% each). Death due to adverse reactions occurred in 5% of patients treated with RYBREVANT
RYBREVANT ® withLAZCLUZE®
In MARIPOSA (n=421), the most common adverse reactions (ARs) (≥20%) were rash (86%), nail toxicity (71%), infusion-related reactions (IRRs) (RYBREVANT®) (63%), musculoskeletal pain (47%), stomatitis (43%), edema (43%), VTE (36%), paresthesia (35%), fatigue (32%), diarrhea (31%), constipation (29%), COVID-19 (26%), hemorrhage (25%), dry skin (25%), decreased appetite (24%), pruritus (24%), and nausea (21%). The most common Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities (≥2%) were decreased albumin (8%), decreased sodium (7%), increased ALT (7%), decreased potassium (5%), decreased hemoglobin (3.8%), increased AST (3.8%), increased GGT (2.6%), and increased magnesium (2.6%).
Serious ARs occurred in 49% of patients, with those occurring in ≥2% of patients including VTE (11%), pneumonia (4%), ILD/pneumonitis and rash (2.9% each), COVID-19 (2.4%), and pleural effusion and IRRs (RYBREVANT®) (2.1% each). Fatal ARs occurred in 7% of patients due to death not otherwise specified (1.2%); sepsis and respiratory failure (1% each); pneumonia, myocardial infarction, and sudden death (0.7% each); cerebral infarction, pulmonary embolism (PE), and COVID-19 infection (0.5% each); and ILD/pneumonitis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and cardiopulmonary arrest (0.2% each).
RYBREVANT ® with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed
In MARIPOSA-2 (n=130), the most common ARs (≥20%) were rash (72%), IRRs (59%), fatigue (51%), nail toxicity (45%), nausea (45%), constipation (39%), edema (36%), stomatitis (35%), decreased appetite (31%), musculoskeletal pain (30%), vomiting (25%), and COVID-19 (21%). The most common Grade 3 to 4 laboratory abnormalities (≥2%) were decreased neutrophils (49%), decreased white blood cells (42%), decreased lymphocytes (28%), decreased platelets (17%), decreased hemoglobin (12%), decreased potassium (11%), decreased sodium (11%), increased alanine aminotransferase (3.9%), decreased albumin (3.8%), and increased gamma-glutamyl transferase (3.1%).
In MARIPOSA-2, serious ARs occurred in 32% of patients, with those occurring in >2% of patients including dyspnea (3.1%), thrombocytopenia (3.1%), sepsis (2.3%), and PE (2.3%). Fatal ARs occurred in 2.3% of patients; these included respiratory failure, sepsis, and ventricular fibrillation (0.8% each).
In PAPILLON (n=151), the most common ARs (≥20%) were rash (90%), nail toxicity (62%), stomatitis (43%), IRRs (42%), fatigue (42%), edema (40%), constipation (40%), decreased appetite (36%), nausea (36%), COVID-19 (24%), diarrhea (21%), and vomiting (21%). The most common Grade 3 to 4 laboratory abnormalities (≥2%) were decreased albumin (7%), increased alanine aminotransferase (4%), increased gamma-glutamyl transferase (4%), decreased sodium (7%), decreased potassium (11%), decreased magnesium (2%), and decreases in white blood cells (17%), hemoglobin (11%), neutrophils (36%), platelets (10%), and lymphocytes (11%).
In PAPILLON, serious ARs occurred in 37% of patients, with those occurring in ≥2% of patients including rash, pneumonia, ILD, PE, vomiting, and COVID-19. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 7 patients (4.6%) due to pneumonia, cerebrovascular accident, cardio-respiratory arrest, COVID-19, sepsis, and death not otherwise specified.
RYBREVANT ® as a Single Agent
In CHRYSALIS (n=129), the most common ARs (≥20%) were rash (84%), IRR (64%), paronychia (50%), musculoskeletal pain (47%), dyspnea (37%), nausea (36%), fatigue (33%), edema (27%), stomatitis (26%), cough (25%), constipation (23%), and vomiting (22%). The most common Grade 3 to 4 laboratory abnormalities (≥2%) were decreased lymphocytes (8%), decreased albumin (8%), decreased phosphate (8%), decreased potassium (6%), increased alkaline phosphatase (4.8%), increased glucose (4%), increased gamma-glutamyl transferase (4%), and decreased sodium (4%).
Serious ARs occurred in 30% of patients, with those occurring in ≥2% of patients including PE, pneumonitis/ILD, dyspnea, musculoskeletal pain, pneumonia, and muscular weakness. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 2 patients (1.5%) due to pneumonia and 1 patient (0.8%) due to sudden death.
LAZCLUZE ® DRUG INTERACTIONS
Avoid concomitant use of LAZCLUZE® with strong and moderate CYP3A4 inducers. Consider an alternate concomitant medication with no potential to induce CYP3A4.
Monitor for adverse reactions associated with a CYP3A4 or BCRP substrate where minimal concentration changes may lead to serious adverse reactions, as recommended in the approved product labeling for the CYP3A4 or BCRP substrate.
Please see full Prescribing Information for
RYBREVANT
cp-491009v1
About
At
Cautions Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains "forward-looking statements" as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding product development and the potential benefits and treatment impact of RYBREVANT®-based regimens. The reader is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations of future events. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from the expectations and projections of
cp-536497
FOOTNOTES
*
† Dr. Nguyen has provided consulting, advisory, and speaking services to
‡ The patient support and resources provided by J&J withMe are not intended to provide medical advice, replace a treatment plan from the patient's doctor or nurse, provide case management services, or serve as a reason to prescribe a
§ The NCCN content does not constitute medical advice and should not be used in place of seeking professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment by licensed practitioners. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.
‖ See the NCCN Guidelines for detailed recommendations, including other treatment options.
¶ The NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC provide recommendations for certain individual biomarkers that should be tested and recommend testing techniques but do not endorse any specific commercially available biomarker assays or commercial laboratories.
References
- RYBREVANT
FASPRO ™ Prescribing Information.Horsham, PA :Janssen Biotech, Inc. - George S, et al. Systematic literature review of intravenous versus subcutaneous administration of oncology therapies: A clinical, economic and patient perspective. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2025 Sep; 139(102974):1-13.
- Bittner B, et al.
Subcutaneous Administration of Biotherapeutics : An Overview of Current Challenges and Opportunities. BioDrugs. 2018 Oct;32(5):425-440. - Aguiar-Ibáñez R, et al. Differences Between Intravenous and Subcutaneous Modes of Administration in Oncology from the Patient, Healthcare Provider, and Healthcare System Perspectives: A Systematic Review.
Adv Ther . 2024 Dec;41(12):4396-4417. - Epstein R S, et al. Cancer patients' perspectives: A qualitative study of reasons for subcutaneous preference vs intravenous treatment. Abstract presented at: 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting;
May 28, 2025 ;Chicago . - Yang J, et al. Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib vs Osimertinib in First-line EGFR-mutant Advanced NSCLC – Final Overall Survival from MARIPOSA [ELCC abstract #40]. Presented at: 2025
European Lung Cancer Congress (ELCC);March 26-29, 2025 ;Paris, France . - Leighl N, et al. Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Amivantamab, Both in Combination With Lazertinib, in Refractory Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Mutated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Primary Results From the Phase III PALOMA-3 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 20;42(30):3593-3605.
-
ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of Lazertinib With Subcutaneous Amivantamab Compared With Intravenous Amivantamab in Participants With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (PALOMA-3). Accessed
July 2025 . https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05388669 -
ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of Amivantamab and Lazertinib Combination Therapy Versus Osimertinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MARIPOSA). Accessed
July 2025 . https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04487080 - Hayashi H, et al. Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to First-Line Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib Vs Osimertinib: Updated Analysis from MARIPOSA [IASLC abstract PT1.03.06]. Presented at: IASLC 2025
World Lung Conference on Lung Cancer ;September 6-9, 2025 ;Barcelona, Spain . - Hayashi H, et al. Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to First-Line Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib Vs Osimertinib: Updated Analysis from MARIPOSA. Poster presented at: IASLC 2025
World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC);September 6-9, 2025 ;Barcelona, Spain . - Oxnard GR, Lo PC, Nishino M, et al. Natural history and molecular characteristics of lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(2):179-184. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182779d18
- The
World Health Organization . Lung Cancer. AccessedJuly 2025 . https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lung-cancer -
American Cancer Society . What is Lung Cancer? AccessedJuly 2025 . https://www.cancer.org/content/cancer/en/cancer/lung-cancer/about/what-is.html - Melosky B, et al. Worldwide Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Mol Diagn Ther. 2021 Nov 23;26(1):7-18.
- Zhang YL, et al. The prevalence of EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(48):78985-78993.
- Midha A, et al. EGFR mutation incidence in non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology: a systematic review and global map by ethnicity. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5(9):2892-2911.
-
American Cancer Society . Personalized care for patients with EGFR-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer: Navigating early to advanced disease management. AccessedNovember 2025 . https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.70024 -
American Lung Association . EGFR and Lung Cancer. AccessedJuly 2025 . https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/lung-disease-lookup/lung-cancer/symptoms-diagnosis/biomarker-testing - Girard N, et al. Comparative clinical outcomes for patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations and common EGFR mutations. Abstract presented at:
World Conference on Lung Cancer Annual Meeting;January 29, 2021 ;Singapore . - Lin JJ, et al. Five-Year Survival in EGFR-Mutant Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma Treated with EGFR-TKIs. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Apr;11(4):556-65.
- Arcila M, et al. EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: prevalence, molecular heterogeneity, and clinicopathologic characteristics. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013 Feb; 12(2):220-9.
SOURCE