Graphite One Advances its United States Graphite Supply Chain Solution with Completion of a Bankable Feasibility Study
Feasibility Study Results Pre-Tax:
7.3 Year Payback on
With Defense Production Act Title III Funding, the Feasibility Study was completed 15 months ahead of schedule
In this news release, all dollar amounts are in
- The Company's
U.S. supply chain is planned to produce graphite concentrate from theGraphite Creek deposit North ofNome, Alaska and Anode Active Material ("AAM") at a facility proposed to be constructed inOhio (the "STP"), subject to financing (collectively, the "Project"). - With support from the
Department of Defense's Defense Production Act ("DPA") Title III funding, the annual graphite concentrate capacity of theGraphite Creek Mine in the FS was increased from that in the 2022 Pre-Feasibility Study ("PFS") – from 53,000 tpy to 175,000 tpy while maintaining a 20-year mine life. - Proven and Probable Reserve tripled (317%) from the reserve disclosed in the PFS.
- Measured plus Indicated Resource tripled (322%) from the resource disclosed in the PFS.
- Resource estimates are based on drilling just 12% of the graphite mineralized zone.
- The FS envisions: the first 48,000 tpy of commercial AAM production by 2028, startup of the
Graphite Creek Mine in 2030 and 169,000 tpy of AAM production by 2031. - The phased development strategy reduces upfront capital and aligns spending with Project milestones.
- Estimated pre-tax internal rate of return ("IRR") of 30%, with a pre-tax net present value ("NPV") of
$6.4 billion using an 8% discount rate, and a payback period of 7.3 years. - Estimated post-tax IRR of 27%, with an estimated post-tax NPV of
$5.0 billion , using an 8% discount rate, and a payback period of 7.5 years.
"Our Feasibility Study represents a major milestone for G1 on our path to production and validates the efforts we've made with the
The FS was prepared by
The Project is planned as an integrated business operation to produce lithium-ion battery anode materials and other graphite products for the
Reduced Capital Risk Development Strategy
The Project is planned to be implemented with a capital risk reduction strategy that develops the Ohio STP in seven 25,000 tpy modules while the Mine completes permitting and construction. This modular approach allows for capital expenditures to be deployed progressively, in line with each phase of development, significantly reducing the upfront capital to
"We will now enter the permitting process with a production rate triple what we projected just over two years ago. Our proven and probable reserve and contained graphite tripled from the reserve and contained graphite disclosed in the PFS. And all of this is based on FS level resource drilling results from just 12% of the 15.3 km (9.5 mile) long graphite mineralized zone as defined by geophysics and wide spaced drilling (see Figure 1),"
____________________________ |
Summary of FS Economics
Tables 1 and 2 present a summary of the estimated FS economic results.
Table 1 : Summary of Estimated FS Economic Results
Economic Parameters |
Project |
STP |
Mine |
|
Pre-tax |
NPV (8%) |
|
|
|
IRR |
30 % |
|
|
|
Payback |
7.3 Years |
|
|
|
Post-tax |
NPV (8%) |
|
|
|
IRR |
27 % |
|
|
|
Payback |
7.5 Years |
|
|
|
Average Annual Production (t/year) |
|
256,510 |
175,000 |
|
Initial and Sustaining Capital Costs 1 |
|
|
|
|
Capital Contingency Costs |
|
|
|
|
Total Capital Costs |
|
|
|
|
1. Non-IFRS Financial Measure as defined below |
|
|
|
Table 2: Summary of Estimated Operating Costs
Operating Costs – Mine |
$/t Concentrate |
LOM $ M |
Total Mined Graphite Concentrate |
|
|
Total Transportation to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Costs – STP |
$/t Production |
LOM $ M |
|
|
|
Purchased Graphite Concentrate |
|
|
Mined Graphite Concentrate & Transportation |
|
|
Total Operating Costs - STP |
|
|
The Project's post-tax IRR includes the estimated effects of Advanced Manufacturing Tax Credits provided under
Based on the FS's updated graphite reserve estimate, the Mine's life for the purposes of the FS would be 20 years. The FS assumes the STP's operational life is 22 years based on its startup with purchased graphite and continued operation with graphite from the Mine.
The STP would produce a targeted average of 256,500 tpy of graphite/carbon products. About 169,000 tpy would be AAM, 25,000 tpy purified graphite products, and 31,000 tpy of unpurified graphite and carbon products. The non-AAM products would serve industrial and defense industry based sectors.
The AAM products are:
- CPN: Coated, spherical natural graphite;
- BAN: Blended natural and artificial graphites;
- SPN: Secondary particle natural graphite; and
- SPC: Secondary particle composite.
Based on the FS assumptions, the average price of all products over the STP's life is estimated at
The estimated capital costs with their respective contingencies are summarized in Table 1.
The STP is designed to produce lithium-ion battery AAM on a commercial scale for the
Permitting, final design, and construction of the first 50,000 tpy of STP natural graphite capacity is expected to take three years. Modular build out of the total 175,000 tpy facility is expected to take about four more years depending on funding and customer demand.
The STP, at full capacity (Table 3), is designed to produce 169,000 tpy of AAM for the electric vehicle and energy storage battery markets; 25,000 tpy of purified, sized material for the speciality graphite market; and 31,000 tpy of unpurified and carbon products for the traditional graphite market. Total annual production is anticipated to be 256,500 tonnes based on the expected annual production capacity.
No. |
Category |
|
Description |
Purity (%Cg) |
Ph 1 (tpy) |
Ph 2 (tpy) |
Ph 3 (tpy) |
Ph4 (tpy) |
$/t 1 |
1 |
Anode Material |
CPN |
Coated, spherical NG |
99.95 |
11,325 |
22,651 |
33,976 |
39,639 |
|
2 |
BAN |
|
99.95 |
21,572 |
43,144 |
64,716 |
75,502 |
|
|
3 |
SPN |
Secondary Particle NG |
99.95 |
3,474 |
6,949 |
10,423 |
12,160 |
|
|
4 |
SPC |
Secondary Particle Composite |
99.95 |
12,024 |
24,048 |
36,073 |
42,085 |
|
|
5 |
Purified |
3299 |
+32 Mesh Purified |
99+ |
110 |
221 |
331 |
386 |
|
6 |
599 |
+50 Mesh Purified |
99+ |
994 |
1,989 |
2,983 |
3,480 |
|
|
7 |
899 |
+80 Mesh Purified |
99+ |
1,104 |
2,209 |
3,313 |
3,866 |
|
|
8 |
199 |
+100 Mesh Purified |
99+ |
1,842 |
3,683 |
5,525 |
6,446 |
|
|
9 |
Battery Conductor |
-320 Mesh Purified |
99.9 |
1,308 |
2,617 |
3,925 |
4,580 |
|
|
10 |
Synthetic Diamond Precursor |
-320 Mesh Purified |
99.99 |
1,794 |
3,587 |
5,381 |
6,278 |
|
|
11 |
Unpurified |
3295 |
+32 Mesh |
95+ |
180 |
360 |
540 |
630 |
|
12 |
595 |
+50 Mesh |
95+ |
1,620 |
3,240 |
4,860 |
5,670 |
|
|
13 |
895 |
+80 Mesh |
95+ |
1,799 |
3,598 |
5,397 |
6,297 |
|
|
14 |
195 |
+100 Mesh |
95+ |
3,000 |
6,001 |
9,001 |
10,502 |
|
|
15 |
Carbon Raisers Lubricants |
Carbon Raisers Lubricants |
95+ |
8,842 |
17,685 |
26,527 |
30,948 |
|
|
16 |
Coke Reject |
Coke Reject |
95+ |
2,298 |
4,596 |
6,894 |
8,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
73,289 |
146,577 |
219,866 |
256,510 |
|
1. |
Artificial graphite AAM prices include equivalent of 48.7% tariff. Natural graphite AAM prices include equivalent of 20% tariff. |
The Mine would produce an average of 175,000 tpy of graphite concentrate for the projected 20-year mine life. The deposit would be mined with conventional open pit mining methods including drilling, blasting, loading, and hauling. The strip ratio in the FS plan is 3.2:1 with an ore variable cut-off grade of 2-3% graphitic carbon and an average head grade of 5.2% graphitic carbon. The pit would be mined in five phases over a period of 20 years. One year of pre-stripping would occur prior to the start-up of the process facility. Ore will be hauled to a process facility to be built adjacent to the pit. Run of mine waste would be comingled with dewatered process tails and placed in waste dumps.
The process facility would process an average of 10,000 tpd for 365 days per year. The flowsheet design is based on metallurgical test work conducted at
Risk Assessment and Mitigation
The risks and uncertainties identified for the Project are generally described in the Company's 2024 Annual Management's Discussion and Analysis statements filed on
Section 25.5 of the FS identifies Project risks specific to the Mine and STP during the construction and operational phases and outlines possible mitigation actions.
Mineral Resources and Reserves
Through 2022, 2023 and 2024, 90 holes have been drilled in the resource area for a total of 13,482 meters of drilling. The resource database consists of 22,806 assays. The resource remains open down dip, and along strike to the East and West.
The Mineral Resource estimate for
Table 4: 2024 Feasibility Study Mineral Resource Estimate 2.0% Cg Cutoff Grade2
|
Tonnage |
%Cg |
Cg |
Measured |
5.1 |
5.3 % |
0.272 |
Indicated |
99.6 |
4.5 % |
4.523 |
Measured + Indicated |
104.7 |
4.6 % |
4.796 |
Inferred |
268.1 |
4.3 % |
11.568 |
The 2023-2024 drilling program focused on converting Inferred Resources into Measured and Indicated, to allow annual graphite production to be increased in the FS. A comparison of the PFS and FS mineral resources can be seen in Table 5.
Table 5: Mineral Resource Comparison – 2024 FS vs 2023 PFS3
Mineral Resource Classification |
PFS |
FS |
Difference |
||||||
Tonnage |
%Cg |
Cg M Tonnes |
Tonnage M Tonnes |
%Cg |
Cg M Tonnes |
Tonnage M Tonnes |
%Cg |
Cg M Tonnes |
|
Measured |
4.67 |
5.8 % |
0.27 |
5.1 |
5.3 % |
0.27 |
0.43 |
-0.5 % |
- |
Indicated |
27.87 |
5.2 % |
1.44 |
99.6 |
4.5 % |
4.52 |
71.73 |
-0.7 % |
3.09 |
M + I* |
32.5 |
5.3 % |
1.71 |
104.7 |
4.6 % |
4.80 |
72.1 |
-0.7 % |
3.09 |
Inferred |
254.67 |
5.1 % |
13.00 |
268.1 |
4.3 % |
11.57 |
13.43 |
-0.8 % |
(1.44) |
* Measured + Indicated |
_______________________________ |
|
2 Footnotes: |
|
a) |
Mineral Resource Statement is effective, |
b) |
Mineral Resources are inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves have not demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that any part of a Mineral Resource will ever be converted into Reserves. |
c) |
Inferred Mineral Resources represent material that is considered too speculative to be included in economic evaluations. Additional trenching and/or drilling will be required to convert Inferred Mineral Resources to Indicated or Measured Mineral Resources. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the inferred resources will ever be upgraded to a higher resource category. |
The 2024 Mineral Reserve estimate consists of 71.219 Mt of Proven and Probable material at an average diluted grade of 5.22% graphite, yielding 3.7 Mt of contained graphite. A variable cut-off grade between 2%-3% was used in calculating the proven/probable reserve. Table 6 shows the FS Mineral Reserve estimate for
Table 6: Graphite Creek Feasibility Study Mineral Reserve Estimate3
Mineral Reserve Classification |
Feasibility Study |
||
Tonnage |
%Cg |
Cg |
|
(M tonnes) |
|
(M Tonnes) |
|
Proven |
4.1 |
5.8 % |
0.238 |
Probable |
67.1 |
5.2 % |
3.48 |
Proven and Probable |
71.2 |
5.2 % |
3.717 |
The FS Mineral Reserve estimate and contained graphite are 71.22 Mt and 3.7 Mt, respectively, an increase of 48.72 Mt and 2.46 Mt over the reserve and contained graphite disclosed in the PFS. A comparison of the PFS versus FS Mineral Reserve estimate can be seen in Table 7.
Table 7: Mineral Reserve Comparison – 2024 FS vs 2022 PFS
Mineral Resource Classification |
PFS |
FS |
Difference |
||||||
Tonnage M Tonnes |
%Cg |
Cg M Tonnes |
Tonnage M Tonnes |
%Cg |
Cg M Tonnes |
Tonnage M Tonnes |
%Cg |
Cg M Tonnes |
|
Proven |
3.81 |
6.0 % |
0.23 |
4.10 |
5.8 % |
0.238 |
0.29 |
-0.2 % |
0.01 |
Probable |
18.70 |
5.5 % |
1.03 |
67.12 |
5.2 % |
3.48 |
48.42 |
-0.3 % |
2.45 |
P + P* |
22.50 |
5.6 % |
1.26 |
71.22 |
5.2 % |
3.72 |
48.72 |
-0.4 % |
2.46 |
*Proven + Probable |
_______________________________ |
|
3Mineral Reserve Footnotes: |
|
a) |
Mineral Reserves follow CIM definitions and are effective as of |
b) |
The Mineral Reserves are inclusive of mining dilution and ore loss. |
c) |
Mineral Reserves are estimated using a raised variable cut-off of 2.0% Cg – 3.0% Cg which is required to maximize secondary treatment production. The economic value is calculated based on a net average |
d) |
The final pit design contains an additional 17.4 Mt of Measured and Indicated resources between the raised cut-off grade (3.0% Cg) and the economic cut-off grade (2.0% Cg) at an average grade of 2.4% Cg. These resources have been treated as waste in the final mine production schedule. |
e) |
The final pit design contains an additional 40.4 Mt of Inferred resources above the economic cut-off grade (2.0% Cg) at an average grade of 3.9% Cg. Inferred Mineral Resources are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that any part of the Inferred Resources could be converted into Mineral Reserves. |
f) |
Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 1,000 t, graphite grades are rounded to two decimal places. Tonnage measurements are in metric units. |
g) |
Totals may not add due to rounding. |
Qualified Persons and NI 43-101 Technical Report
The FS for the Project is incorporated in a NI 43-101 technical report that is available under the Company's SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca and the Company's website. The affiliation and areas of responsibility for each of the independent Qualified Persons (as defined under NI 43-101) are as follows ("QPs"):
Qualified Person |
Company |
Responsibility |
|
|
Primary QP |
Chotipong Somrit, QP |
|
OP Mining |
|
|
OP Geotech |
|
|
Economic Model |
|
Alaska Earth Science |
Geology and Resource Estimate |
|
|
Primary Processing (AK) |
|
|
Water Treatment |
|
|
Water and Water Management |
|
Hatch Engineering |
STP Infrastructure |
|
Hatch Engineering |
STP |
The QPs for this news release are
Data Verification
During the course of their work, the QPs have validated the data that each used in the formulation of the resource estimate and FS findings. This includes such items as: site inspections, core sampling and assays, laboratory test work, core logs, environmental and community factors, metallurgical test work, taxation and royalties, and surveys. Both existing and new data that was collected through the course of the study were validated and used by the various QPs to inform their work. Details regarding the data used and quality assurance and quality control procedures that were employed by each QP in the preparation of the resource estimate and FS will be included in the FS as well as further definition on the precise roles, qualifications, and responsibilities of each QP.
Non-IFRS Financial Measures
The Company has included certain non-IFRS financial measures in this news release, such as Initial Capital Costs and Sustaining Capital Costs, which are not defined under IFRS and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. As a result, these measures may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies. Each of these measures used are intended to provide additional information to the user and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Certain Non-IFRS financial measures used in this news release are defined below.
-
Initial Capital Costs:
Initial capital costs include the upfront capital investment required for mine construction and related infrastructure capital costs in
Alaska and the construction of the STP inOhio State . - Sustaining Capital Costs: Sustaining capital is the ongoing capital investment to sustain and maintain mining, processing and graphite production infrastructure including but not limited to mining, production of graphite products, on-site development, and closure costs.
- Total Capital Costs: Total Capital Costs are the sum of Initial Capital Costs and Sustaining Capital Costs.
About
On Behalf of the Board of Directors
"Anthony Huston" (signed)
For more information on
On X @GraphiteOne
Neither the
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This news release includes certain "forward-looking information" and "forward-looking statements" (collectively, "forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Generally, forward‐looking information can be identified by the use of forward‐looking terminology such as "proposes", "expects", or "is expected", "scheduled", "estimates", "projects", "intends", "assumes", "believes", "indicates" or variations of such words and phrases that state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved".
Forward-looking statements in this news release relate to future events or future performance and reflect current estimates, predictions, expectations or beliefs regarding future events and include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: (i) the estimated amount and grade of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves at the Mine; (ii) the results of the FS and the FS representing a viable development option for the Project; (iii) construction of the Mine and STP and related actions; (iv) the merits of the Project and the potential for the Project to become when in production one of America's largest natural graphite operations and anode material producers;(v) estimates of the capital costs of constructing facilities and bringing a mine and graphite manufacturing plant into production, of sustaining capital and the duration of financing payback periods; (vi) the estimated amount of future production, both produced and recovered by the Mine and produced and sold at the STP; (vii) the availability and future purchase of electricity, graphite feedstock, precursors and reagents; (viii) life of Mine and life of STP estimates and estimates of operating costs and total costs, net cash flow, net present value and economic returns from an operating mine and graphite manufacturing plant constructed for the Project; (ix) investigation of opportunities to improve the economics of the Mine and STP and the success of any such opportunities; and * the completion of additional optimization studies on the Project in advance of, or in connection with, a FS.
All forward-looking statements are based on the Company's current beliefs as well as various assumptions made by them and information currently available to them. The most significant assumptions are set forth above, but generally these assumptions include: (i) the presence of and continuity of minerals at the Mine at estimated grades; (ii) the geotechnical, hydrological, hydrogeological, and metallurgical characteristics conforming to sampled results; (iii) the capacities and durability of various pieces of machinery and equipment; (iv) the availability of electricity, STP feedstock, personnel, machinery and equipment at estimated prices and within the estimated delivery times; (v) currency exchange rates; (vi) the graphite and anode materials sales prices, US tariffs, and exchange rates assumed; (vii) appropriate discount rates applied to the cash flows in the economic analysis; (viii) tax rates and royalty rates applicable to the Project; (ix) the availability of acceptable financing under assumed structure and costs; * the anticipated performance of mined graphite in concentrating processes and STP feedstock in the graphite product manufacturing processes; (xi) reasonable contingency requirements; (xii) success in realizing proposed operations; (xiii) receipt of permits and other regulatory approvals on acceptable terms; and (xiv) the fulfillment of environmental assessment commitments and arrangements with local communities.
Although the Company's management considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. Many forward-looking statements are made assuming the correctness of other forward-looking statements, such as statements of net present value and internal rates of return, which are based on most of the other forward-looking statements and assumptions herein. The cost information is also prepared using current values, but the time for incurring the costs will be in the future and it is assumed costs will remain stable over the relevant period.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, continuity of mineralization, uncertainties related to the ability to obtain necessary permits, licenses and title and delays due to third party opposition, changes in government policies regarding mining and natural resource exploration and exploitation, and continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this forward-looking information, which is given as of the date it is expressed in this news release, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking information, except as required by applicable securities laws. For more information on the Company, investors should review the Company's continuous disclosure filings that are available at www.sedarplus.ca.
Cautionary Note to
This news release has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in
SOURCE