Oncologists Report Seeing More Advanced Cancers and Say Current Tests Are Not Catching Cancer Recurrence Early Enough, New Quest Diagnostics Report Finds
- More than 3 in 4 oncologists (76%) feel they are seeing more advanced cancers, and of these, 75% believe that screening barriers are the leading cause, although nearly one-third (32%) cite "factors that we don't understand yet"
- Missed/delayed follow-up care or monitoring appointments by patients (68%) and imaging tests not detecting recurrence early enough (50%) are among the primary reasons cancer recurrence is typically missed, according to oncologists whose patients' cancer recurrence was missed in an earlier stage
- 94% of oncologists say circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) minimal residual disease (MRD) testing could reduce diagnosis delays in cancer recurrence but cite hurdles to wide adoption
To access the full report, click here.
Based on a survey conducted by The Harris Poll on behalf of
"We call it the cancer paradox: As medical advances improve longevity, more patients than ever face the looming risk of cancer recurrence — and the anxieties and challenges that go with it," said board-certified oncologist
Despite new treatments, new cancer cases in the
Key survey findings:
- 76% of oncologists feel they are seeing more advanced-stage cancers, and of these, 75% believe that screening barriers are the leading cause, followed by rise in aging population (48%) and lifestyle factors (43%). Roughly one in three (32%) cite "factors that we don't understand yet" behind the perceived increase.
- While 89% of oncologists believe identifying cancer recurrence at the earliest possible stage can improve outcomes, roughly 8 in 10 oncologists (79%) report seeing patients whose cancer recurrence was missed in an earlier stage. Of these oncologists, 68% claim missing, skipping and/or delaying follow-up care and monitoring appointments is the most common reason cancer recurrence is typically missed.
- 87% of oncologists claim anxiety/worry is among the most challenging aspects of cancer care for patients, versus 53% who cite treatment side effects as among the most challenging.
- Nine in 10 oncologists (89%) express frustration that insurance reimbursement models are unable to keep up with the latest tech innovations in cancer care, screening, and diagnostics.
Oncologists Value ctDNA MRD Tests but Cite Barriers to Adoption
Oncologists have traditionally monitored for residual or recurring cancer using a range of expensive or invasive technologies, including positron emission tomography (PET) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and tissue biopsies, as well as more accessible but typically nonspecific lab tests.
Yet, oncologists expressed concerns about these traditional methods. Among oncologists whose patients' recurrence was missed in an earlier stage, half (50%) said imaging tests not detecting recurrence early enough was among the primary reasons for why cancer recurrence is typically missed. By comparison, nearly all oncologists (96%) said MRD testing has the potential to identify cancer recurrence earlier than other current methods, with 89% saying test sensitivity to accurately detect residual disease/recurrence as early as possible is one of the most important features of MRD tests.
"We were struck by how many oncologists cited the limitations of imaging in detecting cancer recurrence early," said
Nearly nine in 10 oncologists (88%) agree that MRD testing should be incorporated into the standard of care for cancer-recurrence follow-up monitoring. However, over half say they would be more likely to start, continue, or restart recommending MRD tests if they had more clinical evidence to support effectiveness (61%), were in clinical guidelines (64%), and have expanded insurance or reimbursement coverage (56%).
A study by researchers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Study published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in
The survey also polled oncologists on their preferences for accessing laboratory tests: 71% said they prefer to work with a single laboratory with a broad selection of cancer tests spanning the care continuum versus several labs that each focus on one portion of the patient's journey.
Study Methodology
On behalf of Quest, The Harris Poll surveyed oncologists (174 medical oncologists and 76 surgical oncologists)
About Haystack MRD™
Finding the needle of cancer with a simple blood draw: That's Haystack MRD, a highly sensitive and specific liquid biopsy test designed by cancer genomic pioneers and liquid biopsy experts to uncover the lowest level of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)—tiny bits of DNA in the bloodstream that originate from tumor cancer cells that can signify residual, recurrent, or resistant disease. Used in multiple clinical trials and research studies with top institutions in the
About Quest Diagnostics
i Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H,
ii Tonorezos E, Devasia T,
iii Aliperti LA, Predina JD, Vachani A, Singhal S. Local and systemic recurrence is the Achilles heel of cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Mar;18(3):603-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1442-0. PMID: 21161729; PMCID: PMC11156256. Local and Systemic Recurrence is the Achilles Heel of Cancer Surgery - PMC
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/oncologists-report-seeing-more-advanced-cancers-and-say-current-tests-are-not-catching-cancer-recurrence-early-enough-new-quest-diagnostics-report-finds-302452910.html
SOURCE