KBRA Assigns Ratings to Chemung Financial Corporation
CHMG’s ratings are anchored by its stable, low-cost, and granular funding base, which is supported by an extensive operating history and naturally robust market share in its Southern Tier legacy footprint. Moreover, the conservative approach to liquidity management, including a loan-to-deposit ratio that has historically remained in the low- to mid-80% range, helps reinforce this durable core deposit funding mix that funds most balance sheet growth. The deposit composition is favorable, including a high-level of NIB accounts (26% of total), which supports deposit costs (1.83% in 1Q25) well below the rated peer group. Moving forward, despite the ample growth opportunities in the
Core earnings are supported by a predictable stream of non-spread revenue, led by a wealth management arm (
Core capital, as measured by the CET1 ratio, has typically been managed in excess of 11.5%, naturally benefiting from the company’s lower RWA density (averaging 69% over past five years) and solid internal capital generation ability. However, CHMG’s large, underwater AFS securities portfolio (
While CHMG has previously experienced pockets of uptick in problem asset levels, we believe these to be idiosyncratic, largely driven by fraud-related incidents, and the contemporary loan portfolio appears to be conservatively underwritten. As such, NPAs have trended around 50 bps in recent years with negligible related loss content, while criticized and classified loan trends have been largely benign. That said, the company maintains a somewhat elevated investor CRE concentration, totaling nearly 400% of total risk-based capital as of 1Q25. However, management’s strategic focus on C&I lending in new markets is expected to result in a stable to gradually declining investor CRE concentration over time. Despite the current level, the CRE portfolio is highly granular, supported by disciplined underwriting standards, and is concentrated in stable markets where management has deep experience and long-standing customer relationships. Additionally, office exposure is relatively well-contained at 6% of total loans and is primarily composed of properties with service-oriented tenants located in suburban markets, which have demonstrated greater resilience than central business districts.
To access ratings and relevant documents, click here.
Click here to view the report.
Methodologies
- Financial Institutions: Bank & Bank Holding Company Global Rating Methodology
- ESG Global Rating Methodology
Disclosures
Further information on key credit considerations, sensitivity analyses that consider what factors can affect these credit ratings and how they could lead to an upgrade or a downgrade, and ESG factors (where they are a key driver behind the change to the credit rating or rating outlook) can be found in the full rating report referenced above.
A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here.
Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here.
Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at www.kbra.com.
About KBRA
Doc ID: 1009527
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250527793378/en/
Analytical Contacts
+1 301-969-3045
john.rempe@kbra.com
+1 646-731-1366
richard.veon@kbra.com
+1 646-731-3302
ian.jaffe@kbra.com
+1 301-969-3185
ashley.phillips@kbra.com
Business Development Contact
+1 312-680-4163
justin.fuller@kbra.com
Source: