Burford Capital Research Finds Companies Missing Out on Commercial Class Action Recoveries Due to Opt-Out Reluctance
Costs and uncertainty cited as key barriers to opting out—legal finance offers a solution
The independent survey of 301 senior in-house lawyers at US-based companies found that, although 54% report that their companies had potential commercial class action recoveries exceeding an aggregate of
In-house lawyers cite anticipated litigation costs and uncertainty around potential outcomes as the primary reasons their companies choose to remain in the class rather than pursue potentially higher-value individual claims. Legal finance eliminates upfront litigation costs through fees and expenses financing, which 73% of in-house lawyers cite as a key barrier to opting out. Separately, monetization financing enables businesses to convert a portion of anticipated recoveries from pending claims into immediate capital—enhancing liquidity, improving cash flow predictability and reducing timing and outcome-related risk.
"Corporate legal and finance teams are increasingly focused on value creation, yet many are not leveraging opt-out strategies that could deliver significantly better outcomes," said
Key Findings:
- Opt-outs yield stronger recoveries: Survey results show that in-house lawyers believe opting out significantly increases their recoveries of estimated potential damages, and the vast majority (71%) believe opting out would have increased their company's recovery by more than 25%.
- Cost and uncertainty drive inaction: In-house lawyers cite anticipated litigation costs and uncertainty around outcomes as the main reasons companies forgo opting out, even though 86% say maximizing recoveries from commercial class actions is a business priority. 84% indicate they would be more inclined to opt out if they knew it could significantly increase their recovery.
- Legal finance is an untapped resource: 73% of in-house lawyers identify litigation costs as a key barrier to opting out, yet only 39% have used legal finance to pursue an opt-out strategy—a significant untapped opportunity to mitigate costs and maximize recoveries. Additionally, 71% say access to monetization—converting future expected recoveries into immediate capital—would make them more likely to opt out.
The Survey of In-House Counsel on Commercial Opt-Out Claims was conducted by GLG, gathering insights from 301 in-house lawyers at US-based companies with annual revenues exceeding
The research report can be downloaded on Burford's website here.
About
For more information, please visit www.burfordcapital.com.
This communication shall not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any ordinary shares or other securities of
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/burford-capital-research-finds-companies-missing-out-on-commercial-class-action-recoveries-due-to-opt-out-reluctance-302491001.html
SOURCE