Arizona Metals Announces 2025 Mineral Resource Estimate for Kay Mine Project
/NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO US NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO
- The underground MRE includes 9.28 million tonnes grading 1.39 g/t Au, 27.6 g/t Ag, 0.97% Cu, 0.33% Pb, and 2.39% Zn in the Indicated category, and 0.86 million tonnes grading 1.06 g/t Au, 15.4 g/t Ag, 0.87% Cu, 0.20% Pb, and 1.68% Zn in the Inferred category, at a base-case cut-off grade of 1.00 % CuEq.
- Copper equivalent MRE grades are 9.28 million tonnes @ 3.18% CuEq in the Indicated category and 0.86 million tonnes @ 2.44% CuEq in the Inferred category.
- Quality Asset: High grade, with good geometry and continuity suitable for bulk underground mining methods.
-
Camp Potential : The initial MRE sits within less than 5% of the 10-km long strike of folded prospective host rocks in theKay Project . - Infill Potential: This initial MRE has clear potential to expand between existing drill holes within the deposit, and to upgrade Inferred resource.
- Expansion Potential: The deposit remains open for expansion beyond this initial MRE both along strike and at depth.
- Continued Advancement: Following the completion of additional metallurgical testwork, a preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") is planned for release in the second half of 2025.
- The Company is delivering and executing on all of its previously-stated goals for 2025 and looks forward to continuing the development of the Company's strong assets.
Table 1. Kay Mine Property Underground Mineral Resource Estimate at a Base-case Cut-off Grade of 1.00% CuEq,
Tonnes |
Average Grade |
Contained Metal |
|
||||||||||
Au |
Ag |
Cu |
Pb |
Zn |
CuEq |
Au |
Ag |
Cu |
Pb |
Zn |
CuEq |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Indicated |
|
||||||||||||
9.28 |
1.39 |
27.6 |
0.97 |
0.33 |
2.39 |
3.18 |
415 |
8,253 |
197.9 |
67.3 |
490.1 |
650.6 |
|
Inferred |
|
||||||||||||
0.86 |
1.06 |
15.4 |
0.87 |
0.20 |
1.68 |
2.44 |
29 |
423 |
16.4 |
3.8 |
31.8 |
46.1 |
|
Kay Mine Property Mineral Resource Estimate Notes:
(1)
The effective date of the Kay Mine Project Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) is
(2)
The mineral resource was estimated by
(3) The classification of the current MRE into Indicated and Inferred mineral resources is consistent with current 2014 CIM Definition Standards - For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.
(4) All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and numbers may not add due to rounding.
(5) All mineral resources are presented undiluted and in situ, constrained by continuous 3D wireframe models (considered mineable shapes), and are considered to have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction.
(6) Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that most Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.
(7)
The Kay Mine Project MRE is based on a validated drill hole database which includes data from 234 surface diamond drill holes completed between 2020 and
(8) Grades for Au, Ag, Cu, Pb and Zn are estimated for each mineralization domain using 1.50 m capped composites assigned to that domain. To generate grade within the blocks, the inverse distance squared (ID2) interpolation method was used for all domains.
(9) Average density values were assigned to each domain based on a database of 2,307 samples.
(10) Based on the size, shape, and orientation of the deposit, it is envisioned that the deposits may be mined using underground bulk mining methods such as Longhole Stoping. The MRE is reported at a base case cut-off grade of 1.00 % CuEq. The mineral resource grade blocks are quantified above the base case cut-off grade and within the constraining mineralized wireframes (considered mineable shapes).
(11)
The underground base case cut-off grade of 1.00% CuEq considers metal prices of
(12) The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
Table 2. Kay Mine Property Underground Mineral Resource Estimate at Various CuEq% Cut-off Grades,
Cut-off |
Tonnes |
Average Grade |
Contained Metal |
|
||||||||||
Au |
Ag |
Cu |
Pb |
Zn |
CuEq |
Au |
Ag |
Cu |
Pb |
Zn |
CuEq |
|
||
|
||||||||||||||
Indicated |
|
|||||||||||||
0.80 |
9.90 |
1.32 |
26.5 |
0.93 |
0.31 |
2.28 |
3.04 |
421 |
8,444 |
202.4 |
68.6 |
498.6 |
662.9 |
|
0.90 |
9.59 |
1.36 |
27.1 |
0.95 |
0.32 |
2.34 |
3.11 |
418 |
8,353 |
200.3 |
68.0 |
494.6 |
657.1 |
|
1.00 |
9.28 |
1.39 |
27.6 |
0.97 |
0.33 |
2.39 |
3.18 |
415 |
8,253 |
197.9 |
67.3 |
490.1 |
650.6 |
|
1.10 |
8.94 |
1.43 |
28.3 |
0.99 |
0.34 |
2.46 |
3.26 |
411 |
8,134 |
194.9 |
66.4 |
484.5 |
642.7 |
|
1.20 |
8.60 |
1.47 |
28.9 |
1.01 |
0.35 |
2.52 |
3.35 |
406 |
8,001 |
191.7 |
65.5 |
478.4 |
633.9 |
|
1.50 |
7.47 |
1.62 |
31.3 |
1.09 |
0.38 |
2.75 |
3.65 |
389 |
7,506 |
179.7 |
61.7 |
453.3 |
600.4 |
|
Inferred |
|
|||||||||||||
0.80 |
0.94 |
1.00 |
14.6 |
0.82 |
0.19 |
1.57 |
2.30 |
30 |
443 |
17.1 |
3.9 |
32.6 |
47.8 |
|
0.90 |
0.90 |
1.02 |
14.9 |
0.85 |
0.19 |
1.62 |
2.37 |
30 |
433 |
16.8 |
3.9 |
32.2 |
47.1 |
|
1.00 |
0.86 |
1.06 |
15.4 |
0.87 |
0.20 |
1.68 |
2.44 |
29 |
423 |
16.4 |
3.8 |
31.8 |
46.1 |
|
1.10 |
0.80 |
1.11 |
16.0 |
0.89 |
0.21 |
1.78 |
2.54 |
28 |
410 |
15.7 |
3.7 |
31.2 |
44.7 |
|
1.20 |
0.72 |
1.17 |
16.8 |
0.93 |
0.22 |
1.92 |
2.69 |
27 |
390 |
14.9 |
3.5 |
30.4 |
42.8 |
|
1.50 |
0.55 |
1.37 |
18.8 |
1.05 |
0.25 |
2.28 |
3.11 |
24 |
333 |
12.8 |
3.0 |
27.7 |
37.8 |
|
(1) Underground mineral resources are reported at a base case cut-off grade of 1.00% CuEq. Values in this table reported above and below the base case cut-off grades should not be misconstrued with a Mineral Resource Statement. The values are only presented to show the sensitivity of the block model estimate to the base case cut-off grade.
(2) All values are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
The Company is fully-funded to complete its planned drilling through the end of 2025 and is on track to deliver a PEA in the second half of 2025, for the
Additionally, 5,000 m of reverse circulation drilling is planned at the
About
The Company also owns 100% of the Sugarloaf Peak Project, in La Paz County, which is located on 4,400 acres of BLM claims. The Sugarloaf Peak Project is a heap-leach, open-pit target and has a historic estimate of "100 million tons containing 1.5 million ounces gold" at a grade of 0.5 g/t (Dausinger, N.E., 1983, Phase 1 Drill Program and Evaluation of Gold-Silver Potential,
The historic estimate at the
Qualified Person and Quality Assurance/Quality Control
The mineral resource was estimated by
All of
Gold content was determined by fire assay of a 30-gram charge with ICP finish (ALS method
Au-AA23). Silver and 32 other elements were analyzed by ICP methods with four-acid digestion (ALS method ME-ICP61a). Over-limit samples for Au, Ag, Cu, and Zn were determined by ore-grade analyses Au-GRA21, Ag-OG62, Cu-OG62, and Zn-OG62, respectively.
The qualified person who devised and monitored the Company's QA/QC program is
Disclaimer
This press release contains statements that constitute "forward-looking information" (collectively, "forward-looking statements") within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements and are based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release. Any statement that discusses predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or performance (often but not always using phrases such as "expects", or "does not expect", "is expected", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", "plans", "budget", "scheduled", "forecasts", "estimates", "believes" or "intends" or variations of such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or results "may" or "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken to occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, without limitation, statements regarding the expansion potential of the
THE TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE HAS NEITHER REVIEWED NOR ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE
www.arizonametalscorp.com
https://x.com/ArizonaCorp
SOURCE