Canada Nickel Announces Initial Resources at Mann Central and Texmont
Highlights:
-
Canada Nickel 's Timmins Nickel District has a total of six deposits containing 9.2 million tonnes of Measured & Indicated nickel (3.9 billion tonnes @ 0.24% nickel) and 9.5 million tonnes of Inferred nickel (4.2 billion tonnes @ 0.22% nickel) - Mann Central similar scale to Initial Crawford Nickel Project Resource:
- Indicated Mineral Resource of 236.7 million tonnes grading 0.22% nickel containing 0.52 million tonnes of nickel.
- Inferred Mineral Resource of 543.2 million tonnes grading 0.21% nickel containing 1.15 million tonnes of nickel.
- Exploration Target1 of an additional 0.6-2.0 billion tonnes grading 0.19 – 0.21% nickel.
- Initial Texmont Measured & Indicated Mineral Resource of 37.8 million tonnes grading 0.29% nickel containing higher grade resource of 1.69 million tonnes at 0.71% nickel including 248,000 tonnes at 1.03% nickel.
1 The potential quantity and grade is conceptual in nature; there has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource; it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource (also see below).
The Company has published mineral resources for six of its properties in the
Table 1. Total Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources on
|
|
|
Measured & Indicated |
Inferred |
Exploration |
||||
Project |
Geophysical |
Resource |
Resource |
Ni % |
Contained |
Resource |
Ni % |
Contained |
Target |
Footprint |
Date/Target |
Nickel |
Nickel |
||||||
Crawford |
1.6 |
Oct-23 |
2.56 |
0.24 |
6.03 |
1.69 |
0.22 |
3.73 |
- |
Reid |
3.9 |
Dec-24 |
0.59 |
0.24 |
1.43 |
0.99 |
0.23 |
2.24 |
0.9-2.1 |
Mann W |
3.4 |
Jun-25 |
0.41 |
0.23 |
0.95 |
0.6 |
0.22 |
1.31 |
0.5-1.0 |
Mann CE |
3.1 |
Jul-25 |
0.24 |
0.22 |
0.52 |
0.54 |
0.21 |
1.15 |
0.6-2.0 |
|
0.4 |
Jul-24 |
0.08 |
0.25 |
0.2 |
0.36 |
0.25 |
0.89 |
- |
Texmont |
0.1 |
Jul-25 |
0.04 |
0.29 |
0.11 |
0.05 |
0.25 |
0.14 |
- |
|
0.4 |
Q3-2025 |
TBD |
|
TBD |
TBD |
|
TBD |
TBD |
Midlothian |
1.7 |
Q4-2025 |
TBD |
|
TBD |
TBD |
|
TBD |
TBD |
|
0.4 |
Q4-2025 |
TBD |
|
TBD |
TBD |
|
TBD |
TBD |
TOTAL |
15.0 |
|
3.92 |
0.24 |
9.24 |
4.23 |
0.22 |
9.46 |
|
Mann Central Mineral Resource Estimate
For the initial MRE, a total of 12,563 metres of core drilling from 32 drill holes were utilized to calculate the Mann Central mineral resources in two categories as summarized in Table 2. Indicated Mineral Resources total 237 million tonnes grading 0.22% nickel, for a total of 0.52 million tonnes of contained nickel and Inferred Mineral Resources total 537 million tonnes grading 0.21% nickel, for a total of 1.15 million tonnes of contained nickel. The approximate dimensions of the Mann Central MRE are 2.4 kilometres long, up to 700 metres wide, extending to 500 metres deep, and remaining open in all directions. An additional 0.6 – 2.0 billion tonnes grading between 0.19% and 0.20% nickel remain as an Exploration Target, pending further drilling. This Exploration Target is based on core drilling by the Company, the geophysical survey on the
The Exploration Target was derived by modelling the identified nickel sulphide mineralization within the current estimation envelope but outside of the current MRE area. The volume of the modelled Exploration Target area determines the potential tonnage statement in the Exploration Target. The grade range given in the Exploration Target is determined with consideration to the drill core results within the modelled Exploration Target area, consideration of the geological setting in a well understood nickel deposit type where grades are observed and well understood and based on the experience of the Company and the Qualified Persons. The potential tonnages and grades are conceptual in nature and are based on drill holes and geophysical results that define the approximate length, thickness, depth and grade of the Exploration Target. There has been insufficient exploration to define a current mineral resource and the Company cautions that there is a risk that further exploration will not result in the delineation of a current mineral resource.
Drilling at Mann Central was conducted in 2023 and 2024. The 2024 campaign successfully completed the goal of infilling previous sections to allow for the definition of an initial mineral resource estimate, gain understanding on the geology of the deposit, as well as systematically collecting samples for mineralogical analysis.
The Mann Central MRE was prepared by
Table 2. Initial Total Mineral Resource Estimate (in-pit resources) for the Mann Central Nickel Sulphide Deposit.
Mineral Resource Estimate |
|
Contained Metal |
||||||||||||
Class |
Tonnage |
Ni |
Co |
Fe |
Cr |
Pd |
Pt |
|
Ni |
Co |
Fe |
Cr |
Pd |
Pt |
Indicated |
236.7 |
0.22 |
0.012 |
6.6 |
0.34 |
0.005 |
0.006 |
|
519.5 |
28.2 |
15.7 |
797.9 |
35.1 |
47.1 |
Inferred |
543.2 |
0.21 |
0.012 |
6.8 |
0.30 |
0.006 |
0.007 |
|
1,150 |
65.9 |
37.0 |
1,628 |
98.0 |
129.8 |
Notes to Table 2:
1. |
The independent Qualified Person for the MRE, as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"), is Dr. |
2. |
The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this MRE are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Mineral Resources as Indicated or Measured. However, it is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration. |
3. |
A cut-off grade of 0.10% Ni was used to define potentially economic material for inclusion within the MRE. Cut-offs were determined on the basis of core assay geostatistics and drill core lithologies for the deposit, and by comparison to analogous nickel deposit types. |
4. |
Geological and block models for the MRE used data from a total of 32 surface drill holes, completed by |
5. |
Estimates have been rounded to two significant figures. |
6. |
The MRE was prepared following the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines ( |
7. |
The geological model as applied to the MRE comprises two mineralized domains hosted by variably serpentinized ultramafic rocks: a relatively higher-grade core (dunite), and a lower grade (peridotite). Individual wireframes were created for each domain in Leapfrog Geo 2024.1 software. |
8. |
A 20 m x 20 m x 15 m block model was created, and samples were composited at 7.5 m intervals. Grade estimation from drill hole data was carried out for Ni, Co, Fe, Cr, S, Pd and Pt using the Ordinary Kriging interpolation method in Isatis 2024.04 software. |
9. |
The MRE has been constrained by a conceptual pit envelope that was developed using the following optimization parameters. Metal prices used were |
10. |
Grade estimation was validated by comparison of input and output statistics (Nearest Neighbour and Inverse Distance Squared methods), swath plot analysis, cross-plots of declustered samples against the nearest OK estimate, and by visual inspection of the assay data, block model, and grade shells in cross-sections. |
11. |
Density estimation was carried out for the mineralized domains using the Ordinary Kriging interpolation method, based on 1,270 specific gravity measurements collected during the core logging process, using the same block model parameters of the grade estimation. As a reference, the average estimated density value within dunite is 2.66 g/cm3 (t/m3), while the peridotite domain yielded an average of 2.74 g/cm3 (t/m3). |
Next Steps at
- A technical report with respect to the MRE disclosed today will be filed within 45 days of this news release.
- Infill drilling at the property will aim to increase and upgrade Inferred Mineral Resources to Indicated Mineral Resources in the next drilling campaign.
- Mineralogical and metallurgical analysis will continue to better understand and estimate metal recoveries.
Texmont Mineral Resource Estimate
For the initial Texmont Mineral Resource Estimate ("Texmont MRE"), a total of 44,528 metres of core drilling from 144 drill holes were utilized to calculate the Texmont MRE in three categories as provided in Table 3. Measured Mineral Resources total 3.3 million tonnes grading 0.34% nickel, for a total of 11,281 tonnes of contained nickel, Indicated Mineral Resources total 34.6 million tonnes grading 0.27% nickel, for a total of 97,700 tonnes of contained nickel, and Inferred Mineral Resources total 57.7 million tonnes grading 0.22% nickel, for a total of 143,900 tonnes of contained nickel.
The sulphide mineralogy consists mainly of pentlandite and pyrrhotite with minor millerite, heazlewoodite, pyrite, and chalcopyrite. The sulphide mineralization occurs primarily as next-textured to locally semi-massive, at the core of the high-grade horizon. The high-grade horizon is then surrounded by a medium to low grade envelope that is characterized by disseminated fine grained sulphide mineralization.
The approximate dimensions of the Texmont MRE are 1.3 kilometres long, up to 150 metres wide, extending to 500 metres deep and remaining open at depth (Figure 4).
Drilling by
The Texmont MRE was prepared by
Table 3. Initial Total Mineral Resource Estimate (in-pit resources) for the Texmont Nickel Sulphide Deposit.
Mineral Resource Estimate |
|
Contained Metal |
||||||||||
Class |
Tonnage |
Ni |
Co |
S |
Pd |
Pt |
|
Ni |
Co |
S |
Pd |
Pt |
Measured |
3.3 |
0.34 |
0.013 |
0.37 |
0.018 |
0.016 |
|
11.3 |
0.4 |
12.2 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
Indicated |
34.6 |
0.28 |
0.011 |
0.27 |
0.012 |
0.011 |
|
97.7 |
3.8 |
93.3 |
13.8 |
12.6 |
Mea + Ind |
37.8 |
0.29 |
0.011 |
0.28 |
0.013 |
0.012 |
|
109.0 |
4.3 |
105.5 |
15.6 |
14.4 |
Inferred |
57.7 |
0.25 |
0.010 |
0.22 |
0.010 |
0.009 |
|
143.9 |
5.9 |
122.3 |
17.4 |
17.0 |
Notes to Table 3:
1. |
The independent Qualified Person for the Texmont MRE, as defined by NI 43-101), is Dr. |
2. |
The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this MRE are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Mineral Resources as Indicated or Measured. However, it is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration. |
3. |
A cut-off grade of 0.10% Ni was used to define potentially economic material for inclusion within the MRE. Cut-offs were determined on the basis of core assay geostatistics and drill core lithologies for the deposit, and by comparison to analogous nickel deposit types. |
4. |
Geological and block models for the MRE used data from a total of 144 surface drill holes, completed by |
5. |
Estimates have been rounded to two significant figures. |
6. |
The MRE was prepared following the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines ( |
7. |
The geological model as applied to the MRE comprises five discernible mineralized domains within a variably serpentinized peridotite lava flow unit: High grade (>0.4% nickel), medium grade (0.2-0.4% nickel) and 3 low grade domains (<0.2% nickel) adjacent to non mineralized lithologies. Individual wireframes were created for each domain in Leapfrog Geo 2024.1 software. |
8. |
A 5 m x 10 m x 10 m block model was created and subblocked to 5m x 5m x 5m for tonnage calculation purposes, and samples were composited at 3 m intervals. Grade estimation from drill hole data was carried out for Ni, Co, S, Pd and Pt using the Ordinary Kriging interpolation method in Isatis 2024.04 software. |
9. |
The MRE has been constrained by a conceptual pit envelope that was developed using the following optimization parameters. Metal prices used were |
10. |
Grade estimation was validated by comparison of input and output statistics (Nearest Neighbour and Inverse Distance Squared methods), swath plot analysis, cross-plots of declustered samples against the nearest OK estimate, and by visual inspection of the assay data, block model, and grade shells in cross-sections. |
11. |
Density estimation was carried out for the mineralized domains using the Ordinary Kriging interpolation method, based on 4,008 specific gravity measurements collected during the core logging process, using the same block model parameters of the grade estimation. As a reference, the average estimated density value within the komatiite is 2.89 g/cm3 (t/m3), while the peridotite domain yielded an average of 2.72 g/cm3 (t/m3). |
Next Steps at the Texmont Nickel Sulphide Project:
- A technical report with respect to the Mineral Resource Estimate disclosed today will be filed within 45 days of this news release.
- Mineralogical and metallurgical analysis will continue to better understand and estimate metal recoveries.
Assays, Quality Assurance/Quality Control and Drilling
Qualified Person and Data Verification
The magnetic geophysical images shown in this news release were created from
References
Naldrett, A.J., and
About Canada Nickel Company
For further information, please contact:
CEO
Phone: 647-256-1954
Email: info@canadanickel.com
Cautionary Note and Statement Concerning Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains certain information that may constitute "forward-looking information" under applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward looking information includes, but is not limited to, the potential of the
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/canada-nickel-announces-initial-resources-at-mann-central-and-texmont-302505449.html
SOURCE