Sherritt Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results and Updated Guidance; Moa JV Expansion Phase Two Ramp Up Commencing; Further Cost Reductions
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO
Leon Binedell, Executive Chairman, President and CEO of
“Our ability to supplement the Moa JV’s production of mixed sulphides with third-party feed to the refinery is very limited as current available feeds are no longer economical due to high Chinese payabilities for intermediate feeds. As a result, we need to lower our Metals production guidance for this year to reflect these realities.
“In addition to the recovery plan being implemented in alignment with our partners — which includes additional expatriate personnel at Moa, and drilling a replacement gas well for CUPET to maintain Energas power production — we have also implemented additional significant cost reduction measures at
“The debt and equity transactions we closed during the quarter strengthened our balance sheet, reduced our outstanding debt obligations, decreased our annual interest expense and extended our debt maturity to late 2031 providing a solid foundation and increased flexibility for future growth. While nickel price remains under pressure, we expect our corrective actions and the completion of the Moa JV’s phase two expansion to translate into stronger performance ahead. We remain confident in our strategy and long-term outlook and remain well positioned to capitalize on a market recovery.”
SECOND QUARTER 2025 SELECTED DEVELOPMENTS
-
Closed strategic transactions to consolidate the Corporation’s debt, significantly extending the maturity to
November 2031 , strengthening the Corporation’s capital structure by reducing debt obligations by$68.0 million (2) and decreasing annual interest expense by approximately$3.0 million . - Finished nickel and cobalt production at the Moa Joint Venture (“Moa JV”) was 3,431 tonnes and 389 tonnes, respectively (Sherritt’s share(1)).
- Finished nickel and cobalt sales were 3,256 tonnes and 380 tonnes, respectively.
-
Net direct cash cost (“NDCC”)
(3) was
US$5.27 /lb benefiting from higher cobalt, fertilizer and other by-product credits and lower maintenance cost. -
Electricity production was 176 GWh. As planned, the Varadero facility continues to operate in frequency control to help support the stability of the Cuban national power grid.
Energas S.A. (“Energas”) expects to be fully compensated for the Varadero facility operating in frequency control throughout most of 2025. In addition, Unión Cubapetróleo (“CUPET”) is continuing to advance work to replace declining gas production from one of its legacy wells. Lower gas production from the compromised CUPET gas well continues to be partly offset by increased gas production from the new well that came online in Q4 2024. A replacement well is expected to be in production in Q3 2025. -
Electricity unit operating cost
(3) was
$24.80 /MWh primarily reflecting lower planned maintenance and the impact of lower electricity production and sales. -
Net earnings from continuing operations was
$10.4 million , or$0.02 per share. -
Adjusted net loss from continuing operations
(3) was
$25.6 million or$(0.06) per share which primarily excludes$32.4 million gain on Sherritt’s debt and equity transactions completed in the quarter. -
Adjusted EBITDA
(3) was
$2.6 million . -
Updates to 2025 guidance:
-
At Metals, as a result of significant challenges in the general operating environment in
Cuba resulting in materially lower production of mixed sulphides feed in the first half of the year coupled with limited availability of profitable third-party feeds due to high Chinese payabilities for intermediate feeds,Sherritt is lowering its full year production guidance range.Sherritt still anticipates higher second half production on the back of the commissioning and ramp up of the sixth leach train at Moa and with the implementation of a recovery plan agreed to by the joint venture partners that would also see greater expat involvement in the recovery efforts inCuba .Sherritt has revised its finished nickel production guidance range from 31,000 to 33,000 tonnes to 27,000 to 29,000 tonnes and its finished cobalt production guidance range from 3,300 to 3,600 tonnes to 3,000 to 3,200 tonnes. The revised guidance ranges reflect limited third-party feed due to the market dynamics mentioned and lower than originally forecast mixed sulphides production from Moa as the impact of near-term challenges from the decline in operating environment is expected to take time to mitigate despite the increased capacity from the expansion being available in the second half of the year. -
In light of the continued challenging operating and nickel pricing environment, opportunities to decrease or defer certain capital spending items are being implemented at Metals. As a result, 2025 guidance for sustaining capital has been reduced from
$35.0 million to$30.0 million and the tailings facility spending has been reduced from$40.0 million to$35.0 million . The lower 2025 spending on the new tailings facility is a deferral of spending; overall spending for the project remains unchanged with the timeline for commissioning still on track and expected in the second half of 2026. - At Power, the guidance range for electricity production is unchanged. With the interruption of gas supply from a legacy CUPET well, estimated electricity production for the year is expected to be at the lower end of the 2025 guidance range of 800 GWh to 850 GWh. The loss of gas from the compromised well is being partially mitigated with gas from other wells and CUPET is actively working to replace gas production with a new well in Q3.
- The NDCC(3) and unit operating cost(3) ranges in Metals and Power, respectively, as well as spending on capital in Power remain unchanged.
-
At Metals, as a result of significant challenges in the general operating environment in
-
Available liquidity in
Canada as atJune 30, 2025 was$45.0 million . -
Power dividends in
Canada were$5.6 million in Q2 2025, totaling$9.9 million for the six months endedJune 30, 2025 . -
The Corporation’s syndicated revolving-term credit facility maturity was extended by one year from
April 30, 2026 toApril 30, 2027 . There were no other significant changes to the terms, financial covenants or restrictions. - Phase two of the Moa JV expansion is in the final stage of commissioning activities. Ramp up remains expected for H2 2025.
-
Copper Mark: In
May 2025 ,Sherritt received confirmation it became a Participant of the Copper Mark as it aims to obtain The Nickel Mark award for its refinery inFort Saskatchewan . The Nickel Mark is part of the Copper Mark assurance framework that supports responsible production practices and demonstrates commitment to the green transition across the value chains of copper, nickel, molybdenum and zinc. ForSherritt , participation in this assurance process is an essential part of its strategic focus to build customer and key stakeholder value in the critical minerals industry.
(1) |
|
References to operational and financial metrics in this press release, unless otherwise indicated, are to “Sherritt’s share” which is consistent with the Corporation’s definition of reportable segments for financial statement purposes. Sherritt’s share of “Metals” includes the Corporation’s 50% interest in the Moa JV, its 100% interest in the utility and fertilizer operations in |
(2) |
|
Principal amount of Second Lien Notes and PIK Notes at the transaction date and the premium required to be paid on maturity of the Second Lien Notes in |
(3) |
|
Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
DEVELOPMENTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE QUARTER
Organizational cost reductions
Amid persistent multi-year lows in nickel prices and a materially lower short- to medium-term pricing outlook due to a global slowdown in the EV supply chain expansion outside of
Over the past several years,
Q2 2025 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
|||||
$ millions, except per share amount |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenue |
$ |
43.7 |
$ |
51.4 |
(15%) |
$ |
82.1 |
$ |
80.2 |
2% |
|||||
Combined revenue(1) |
|
135.6 |
|
163.2 |
(17%) |
|
261.3 |
|
290.9 |
(10%) |
|||||
Loss from operations and joint venture |
|
(19.4) |
|
(1.9) |
(921%) |
|
(51.2) |
|
(24.3) |
(111%) |
|||||
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
10.4 |
|
(11.5) |
190% |
|
(30.2) |
|
(52.4) |
42% |
|||||
Net earnings (loss) for the period |
|
10.2 |
|
(11.5) |
189% |
|
(30.4) |
|
(52.0) |
42% |
|||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
|
2.6 |
|
13.0 |
(80%) |
|
7.0 |
|
6.5 |
8% |
|||||
Adjusted loss from continuing operations(1) |
|
(25.6) |
|
(10.0) |
(156%) |
|
(47.8) |
|
(34.6) |
(38%) |
|||||
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations ($ per share) |
|
0.02 |
|
(0.03) |
167% |
|
(0.07) |
|
(0.13) |
46% |
|||||
Adjusted loss from continuing operations ($ per share)(1) |
|
(0.06) |
|
(0.03) |
(100%) |
|
(0.11) |
|
(0.08) |
(38%) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities |
|
5.6 |
|
(37.8) |
115% |
|
6.6 |
|
(24.8) |
127% |
|||||
Combined free cash flow(1) |
|
2.8 |
|
(27.0) |
110% |
|
(3.8) |
|
(11.2) |
66% |
|||||
Average exchange rate (CAD/US$) |
|
1.384 |
|
1.368 |
1% |
|
1.409 |
|
1.359 |
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
|
||
$ millions, as at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
$ |
32.1 |
(54%) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.4 |
|
113.0 |
(6%) |
||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
(17%) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.6 |
|
145.7 |
(17%) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans and borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
315.7 |
|
372.5 |
(15%) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The Corporation's share of cash and cash equivalents in the Moa Joint Venture, not included in the above balances: |
|
$ |
21.7 |
$ |
5.7 |
281% |
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(2) |
|
As at |
Cash and cash equivalents were
As at
At current spot nickel prices, and based on revised 2025 guidance for Metals, (please refer to the Outlook section of this press release for further details), the Corporation expects that distributions under the Cobalt Swap(2) agreement will be limited, commence in the fourth quarter of 2025 and will not meet the annual minimum amount in 2025.
The Moa JV’s cash and cobalt distributions to the Corporation are determined based on available cash in excess of liquidity requirements. Determinants of the Moa JV’s liquidity include but are not limited to, anticipated nickel and cobalt prices and sales volumes, spending on capital at the Moa JV, financing, working capital, and other liquidity requirements. Available cash is also impacted by changes in working capital primarily related to changes in inventory, and timing of receipts and payments, including receipts on nickel and cobalt sales subsequent to shipment.
Based on 2025 guidance for Power which includes electricity production that is expected to be at the lower end of the guidance range, (please refer to the Outlook section of this press release for further details),
For further information on risks related to distributions from the Moa JV and dividends in
As at
Debt and Equity Transactions
In
Corporate update
Sir
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(2) |
|
For additional information on the Cobalt Swap, see Note 12 – Advances, loans receivable and other financial assets of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended |
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
Metals
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
2025 |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
$ millions ( |
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenue |
$ |
124.7 |
$ |
150.6 |
(17%) |
$ |
238.4 |
$ |
265.7 |
(10%) |
|||||
Cost of sales |
|
130.1 |
|
144.5 |
(10%) |
|
249.2 |
|
275.6 |
(10%) |
|||||
(Loss) earnings from operations |
|
(7.4) |
|
2.7 |
(374%) |
|
(16.0) |
|
(18.3) |
13% |
|||||
Adjusted EBITDA(2) |
|
7.8 |
|
18.0 |
(57%) |
|
13.3 |
|
10.5 |
27% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
CASH FLOW(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash provided by continuing operations for operating activities(2) |
$ |
20.0 |
$ |
21.2 |
(6%) |
$ |
41.9 |
$ |
52.4 |
(20%) |
|||||
Free cash flow(2) |
|
6.4 |
|
13.5 |
(53%) |
|
17.8 |
|
35.2 |
(49%) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
PRODUCTION VOLUMES (tonnes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Mixed sulphides ("MSP")(3) |
|
3,238 |
|
4,095 |
(21%) |
|
6,395 |
|
8,147 |
(22%) |
|||||
Finished nickel |
|
3,431 |
|
3,383 |
1% |
|
6,378 |
|
6,980 |
(9%) |
|||||
Finished cobalt |
|
389 |
|
342 |
14% |
|
712 |
|
684 |
4% |
|||||
Fertilizer |
|
65,207 |
|
60,355 |
8% |
|
121,027 |
|
117,419 |
3% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
NICKEL RECOVERY (4) (%) |
|
83% |
|
88% |
(6%) |
|
84% |
|
87% |
(3%) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
SALES VOLUMES (tonnes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Finished nickel |
|
3,256 |
|
3,791 |
(14%) |
|
6,695 |
|
7,814 |
(14%) |
|||||
Finished cobalt |
|
380 |
|
390 |
(3%) |
|
836 |
|
752 |
11% |
|||||
Fertilizer |
|
44,614 |
|
60,682 |
(26%) |
|
77,734 |
|
84,591 |
(8%) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
AVERAGE-REFERENCE PRICE (5) (US$ per pound) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Nickel |
$ |
6.88 |
$ |
8.35 |
(18%) |
$ |
6.97 |
$ |
7.94 |
(12%) |
|||||
Cobalt |
|
17.50 |
|
13.34 |
31% |
|
15.24 |
|
13.59 |
12% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
AVERAGE-REALIZED PRICE (2) (CAD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Nickel ($ per pound) |
$ |
9.57 |
$ |
11.25 |
(15%) |
$ |
9.78 |
$ |
10.55 |
(7%) |
|||||
Cobalt ($ per pound) |
|
18.19 |
|
14.32 |
27% |
|
15.51 |
|
14.41 |
8% |
|||||
Fertilizer ($ per tonne) |
|
674.44 |
|
574.70 |
17% |
|
591.10 |
|
528.73 |
12% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
UNIT OPERATING COST (2)(US$) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Nickel - net direct cash cost (US$ per pound) |
$ |
5.27 |
$ |
5.75 |
(8%) |
$ |
5.64 |
$ |
6.50 |
(13%) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
SPENDING ON CAPITAL (2)(CAD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sustaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Moa JV (50% basis), Fort Site (100% basis) |
$ |
7.6 |
$ |
4.6 |
65% |
$ |
16.4 |
$ |
11.0 |
49% |
|||||
Moa JV - Tailings facility (50% basis) |
|
5.0 |
|
2.8 |
79% |
|
9.8 |
|
3.8 |
158% |
|||||
Growth - Moa JV (50% basis) |
|
2.3 |
|
0.4 |
475% |
|
4.0 |
|
2.4 |
67% |
|||||
|
$ |
14.9 |
$ |
7.8 |
91% |
$ |
30.2 |
$ |
17.2 |
76% |
(1) |
|
The amounts included in the Financial Highlights, and cash flow sections for Metals above include the combined results of the Moa JV, Fort Site and Metals Marketing. Breakdowns of revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, and the components of free cash flow (cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities and Property, plant and equipment expenditures) for each of these operations are included in the Combined Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and Free cash flow reconciliations, respectively, in the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(2) |
|
Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(3) |
|
Mixed sulphides = mixed sulphide precipitate (MSP). |
(4) |
|
The nickel recovery rate measures the amount of finished nickel that is produced compared to the original nickel content of the ore that was mined. |
(5) |
|
Reference sources: Nickel – |
Revenue
Metals revenue in Q2 2025 was
Nickel revenue in Q2 2025 was
Cobalt revenue in Q2 2025 was
Fertilizer revenue in Q2 2025 was
Cobalt Swap
There were no sales of cobalt from the Cobalt Swap in either Q2 2025 or Q2 2024. In the six months ended
Variances in cobalt sales volumes, revenue and cost of sales are, in part, dependent upon the timing of receipts of cobalt and their subsequent sale by
While the timing of the sales under the Cobalt Swap or by Moa JV directly results in variances in sales volumes, revenue and cost of sales, it does not have a material impact on earnings from operations, average-realized prices(1), cobalt by-product credits(2), or NDCC(1). This is because the variance in revenue and costs of Sherritt’s share of cobalt under the Cobalt Swap is offset by Sherritt’s share of revenue and costs of the Moa JV and the cost of cobalt sold on volumes of cobalt redirected from GNC is determined based on the in-kind value of cobalt calculated as the cobalt reference price from the month preceding distribution less a mutually agreed selling cost adjustment.
At current spot nickel prices, and based on revised 2025 guidance for Metals, (please refer to the Outlook section of this press release for further details), the Corporation expects that distributions under the Cobalt Swap agreement will be limited, commence in the fourth quarter of 2025 and will not meet the annual minimum amount in 2025.
Refer to the risks related to Sherritt’s corporate structure in the Corporation’s 2024 Annual Information Form for further information on risks related to distributions from the Moa JV.
Production
Mixed sulphides production at the Moa JV in Q2 2025 was 3,238 tonnes compared to 4,095 tonnes in Q2 2024. The lower production in Q2 2025 was primarily attributable to the planned shutdown at the Acid Plant. Due to high acid prices and low nickel prices, the Moa JV elected to not purchase acid during this period which lowered MSP production by approximately 1,000 tonnes (100% basis). The general challenging operating environment in
Sherritt’s share of finished nickel and cobalt production in Q2 2025 was 3,431 tonnes and 389 tonnes, compared to 3,383 tonnes and 342 tonnes, respectively, in Q2 2024. In the Q2 2025, production was primarily impacted by lower mixed sulphides feed availability from Moa which could not be offset by third-party feeds due to unprofitably high payabilities in the intermediate market. In 2025,
Fertilizer production in Q2 2025 of 65,207 tonnes was 8% higher compared to Q2 2024 primarily due to improved equipment availability as a result of timing of maintenance activities.
NDCC (1)
NDCC(1) per pound of nickel sold in Q2 2025 was
Spending on capital(1)
Sustaining spending on capitalin Q2 2025 was
Sustaining spending on capitalrelated to the tailings facility in Q2 2025 was
Growth spending on capitalin Q2 2025 was
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(2) |
|
Cobalt by-product credits include Sherritt’s share of cobalt revenue per pound of nickel sold only. |
Expansion program and strategic developments
Moa JV expansion program
During the quarter, commissioning of phase two of the Moa JV expansion, the processing plant, continued. This work will be completed by mid-August with ramp up scheduled to occur in the third quarter. Additional MSP from the ramp up of phase two of the expansion is expected to begin to be processed at the refinery in the fourth quarter of this year.
The low capital intensity expansion program, which remains under budget, is expected to fill the refinery to nameplate capacity to maximize profitability from the joint venture’s own mine feed, displacing lower margin third-party feeds and increasing overall finished nickel and cobalt production. The Moa JV could pursue further expansion opportunities at the refinery should sufficient positive margin third-party feeds be available to further expand finished nickel and cobalt production and expand cash flow generation capacity.
Strategic developments
During the quarter,
As a result of the organization wide cost reduction initiative, work on this project will be paused until broader nickel market conditions improve and greater certainty on the timeline for development of the downstream electric vehicle supply chain in
Power
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
2025 |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
$ millions (33 ⅓% basis), except as otherwise noted |
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenue |
$ |
10.6 |
$ |
11.8 |
(10%) |
$ |
22.0 |
$ |
23.8 |
(8%) |
|||||
Cost of sales |
|
5.0 |
|
9.3 |
(46%) |
|
11.9 |
|
13.3 |
(11%) |
|||||
Earnings from operations |
|
4.3 |
|
1.2 |
258% |
|
7.0 |
|
8.3 |
(16%) |
|||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
|
5.0 |
|
1.8 |
178% |
|
8.4 |
|
9.4 |
(11%) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
CASH FLOW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities(1) |
$ |
16.0 |
$ |
(7.8) |
305% |
$ |
16.9 |
$ |
1.9 |
789% |
|||||
Free cash flow(1) |
|
15.2 |
|
(9.3) |
263% |
|
16.0 |
|
(2.2) |
827% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
PRODUCTION AND SALES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electricity (GWh(2)) |
|
176 |
|
205 |
(14%) |
|
346 |
|
415 |
(17%) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
AVERAGE-REALIZED PRICE (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electricity ($/MWh(2)) |
$ |
52.56 |
$ |
52.00 |
1% |
$ |
53.53 |
$ |
51.62 |
4% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
UNIT OPERATING COSTS (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electricity ($/MWh) |
$ |
24.80 |
$ |
42.74 |
(42%) |
$ |
31.03 |
$ |
29.81 |
4% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
SPENDING ON CAPITAL (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Sustaining |
$ |
0.8 |
$ |
1.5 |
(47%) |
$ |
0.9 |
$ |
4.1 |
(78%) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
(2) |
|
Gigawatt hours (“GWh”), Megawatt hours (“MWh”). |
Frequency control at Varadero
As a result of the nationwide power outages in
Revenue
Revenue in Q2 2025 was
Production
Production volume in Q2 2025 was 176 GWh compared to 205 GWh in Q2 2024. Lower electricity production was primarily a result of the Varadero facility operating in frequency control and the loss of gas production from one of CUPET’s legacy gas wells which experienced an increase in water production in Q1 2025 impacting the amount of gas provided to the power facility. CUPET is actively working to replace production from the well with the development of a new gas well which is expected to be drilled in August and begin production in September. The decrease in gas supply during the quarter was partially offset by increased gas supply from other wells.
Unit operating cost (1)
Unit operating cost(1) in Q2 2025 was
Spending on capital(1)
Spending on capital(1) was
Dividends from Energas
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP financial measures. For additional information see the Non-GAAP and other financial measures section of this press release. |
OUTLOOK
2025 production volumes, unit operating costs and spending on capital guidance
Production volumes, unit operating costs and spending on capital |
Guidance for 2025 - Total |
|
Year-to-date actuals - Total |
|
Updated 2025 guidance - Total |
|
|
|
|
||
Production volumes |
|
|
|
||
Metals - Moa JV (100% basis, tonnes) |
|
|
|
||
Finished nickel |
31,000 – 33,000 |
|
12,756 |
|
27,000 – 29,000 |
Finished cobalt |
3,300 – 3,600 |
|
1,424 |
|
3,000 – 3,200 |
Power - Electricity (33⅓% basis, GWh) |
800 – 850 |
|
346 |
|
No change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit operating costs (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Metals – NDCC(1) (US$ per pound) |
|
|
|
|
No change |
Electricity – unit operating cost ($ per MWh) |
|
|
|
|
No change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spending on capital (1)($ millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sustaining |
|
|
|
|
|
Metals - Moa JV (50% basis), Fort Site (100% basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
Metals - Moa JV – Tailings facility (50% basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
Power (33⅓% basis) |
|
|
|
|
No change |
Growth |
|
|
|
|
|
Metals - Moa JV (50% basis) |
|
|
|
|
No change |
Spending on capital(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Metals
As a result of significant challenges in the general operating environment in
In light of the continued challenging operating and nickel pricing environment, opportunities to decrease or defer certain capital spending items are being implemented at Metals. As a result, 2025 guidance for sustaining capital has been reduced from
Based on NDCC(1) for the six months ended
Power
The guidance range for electricity production is unchanged, with the interruption of gas supply from a legacy CUPET well, estimated electricity production for the year is expected to be at the lower end of the 2025 guidance range of 800 GWh to 850 GWh.
Based on unit operating cost(1) in the first half of 2025, and the absence of planned major maintenance activities in the second half of the year,
CONFERENCE CALL AND WEBCAST
North American callers, please dial: |
1 (800) 717-1738 Passcode: 22560 |
|
International callers, please dial: |
1 (289) 514-5100 Passcode: 22560 |
|
Live webcast: |
Please dial in 15 minutes before the start of the call to secure a line. Alternatively, listeners can access the conference call and presentation via the webcast available on Sherritt’s website.
An archive of the webcast and replay of the conference call will also be available on the website.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (“MD&A”)
Sherritt’s condensed consolidated financial statements and MD&A for the three and six months ended
NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES
Management uses the following non-GAAP and other financial measures in this press release and other documents: combined revenue, adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“adjusted EBITDA”), average-realized price, unit operating cost/net direct cash cost (NDCC), adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations, adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations per share, spending on capital, combined cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities and combined free cash flow.
Management uses these measures to monitor the financial performance of the Corporation and its operating divisions and believes these measures enable investors and analysts to compare the Corporation’s financial performance with its competitors and/or evaluate the results of its underlying business. These measures are intended to provide additional information, not to replace IFRS® Accounting Standards (“IFRS”) measures, and do not have a standard definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. As these measures do not have a standardized meaning, they may not be comparable to similar measures provided by other companies.
The non-GAAP and other financial measures are reconciled to their most directly comparable IFRS measures in the Appendix below.
ABOUT
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of statements that include such words as “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “forecast”, “likely”, “may”, “will”, “could”, “should”, “suspect”, “outlook”, “potential”, “projected”, “continue” or other similar words or phrases. Specifically, forward-looking statements in this document include, but are not limited to, statements regarding strategies, plans and estimated production amounts resulting from expansion of mining operations at the Moa JV; growing and increasing nickel and cobalt production, including increasing MSP production; the Moa JV expansion program update as it relates to the Processing Plant; statements set out in the “Outlook” section of this press release; certain expectations regarding production volumes and increases, inventory levels, operating costs, capital spending and intensity, including amount and timing of spending on tailings management; sales volumes; revenue, costs and earnings; significant liquidity improvement following completion of debt and equity transactions reducing outstanding debt and extending maturities; challenges with foreign currency constraints; the availability of additional gas supplies and timing for addressing the current supply interruption of gas to be used for power generation; the amount and timing of dividend distributions from the Moa JV, including in the form of finished cobalt or cash under the Cobalt Swap; the amount and timing of dividend distributions from Energas; growing shareholder value; expected annualized savings from cost reduction measures and workforce reduction; sufficiency of working capital management and capital project funding; strengthening the Corporation’s capital structure and amounts of certain other commitments.
Forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather on current expectations, assumptions and projections about future events, including commodity and product prices and demand; the level of liquidity and access to funding; share price volatility; nickel, cobalt and fertilizer production results and realized prices; current and future demand products produced by
The Corporation cautions readers of this press release not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement as a number of factors could cause actual future results, conditions, actions or events to differ materially from the targets, expectations, estimates or intentions expressed in the forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, commodity risks related to the production and sale of nickel cobalt and fertilizers; security market fluctuations and price volatility; level of liquidity of
The Corporation, together with its Moa JV, is pursuing a range of growth and expansion opportunities, including without limitation, process technology solutions, development projects, commercial implementation opportunities, life of mine extension opportunities and the conversion of mineral resources to reserves. In addition to the risks noted above, factors that could, alone or in combination, prevent the Corporation from successfully achieving these opportunities may include, without limitation: identifying suitable commercialization and other partners; successfully advancing discussions and successfully concluding applicable agreements with external parties and/or partners; successfully attracting required financing; successfully developing and proving technology required for the potential opportunity; successfully overcoming technical and technological challenges; successful environmental assessment and stakeholder engagement; successfully obtaining intellectual property protection; successfully completing test work and engineering studies, prefeasibility and feasibility studies, piloting, scaling from small scale to large scale production, procurement, construction, commissioning, ramp-up to commercial scale production and completion; and securing regulatory and government approvals. There can be no assurance that any opportunity will be successful, commercially viable, completed on time or on budget, or will generate any meaningful revenues, savings or earnings, as the case may be, for the Corporation. In addition, the Corporation will incur costs in pursuing any particular opportunity, which may be significant.
Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive and should be considered in conjunction with the risk factors described in the Corporation’s other documents filed with the Canadian securities authorities, including without limitation the “Managing Risk” section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the three and six months ended
The Corporation may, from time to time, make oral forward-looking statements. The Corporation advises that the above paragraph and the risk factors described in this press release and in the Corporation’s other documents filed with the Canadian securities authorities should be read for a description of certain factors that could cause the actual results of the Corporation to differ materially from those in the oral forward-looking statements. The forward-looking information and statements contained in this press release are made as of the date hereof and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any oral or written forward-looking information or statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable securities laws. The forward-looking information and statements contained herein are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.
APPENDIX – NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES
Management uses the measures below to monitor the financial performance of the Corporation and its operating divisions and believes these measures enable investors and analysts to compare the Corporation’s financial performance with its competitors and/or evaluate the results of its underlying business. These measures are intended to provide additional information, not to replace IFRS Accounting Standards measures, and do not have a standard definition under IFRS Accounting Standards and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards. As these measures do not have a standardized meaning, they may not be comparable to similar measures provided by other companies.
The non-GAAP and other financial measures are reconciled in the sections below to the most directly comparable IFRS Accounting Standards as presented in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended
Combined revenue
The Corporation uses combined revenue as a measure to help management assess the Corporation’s financial performance across its core operations. Combined revenue includes the Corporation’s consolidated revenue, less Oil and Gas revenue, and includes the revenue of the Moa JV within the Metals reportable segment on a 50% basis. Revenue of the Moa JV is included in share of earnings of Moa Joint Venture, net of tax, as a result of the equity method of accounting and excluded from the Corporation’s consolidated revenue.
Revenue at Oil and Gas is excluded from Combined revenue as the segment is not currently exploring for or producing oil and gas and its revenue relate to ancillary drilling services, provided to a customer and agencies of the Government of
Management uses this measure to reflect the Corporation’s economic interest in its operations prior to the application of equity accounting to help allocate financial resources and provide investors with information that it believes is useful in understanding the scope of Sherritt’s business, based on its economic interest, irrespective of the accounting treatment.
The table below reconciles combined revenue to revenue per the financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
|
|
2025 |
|
2024 |
|
|
||||||||||
$ millions |
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Revenue by reportable segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Metals(1) |
$ |
124.7 |
|
$ |
150.6 |
|
(17 |
%) |
$ |
238.4 |
|
$ |
265.7 |
|
(10 |
%) |
|||||
Power |
|
10.6 |
|
|
11.8 |
|
(10 |
%) |
|
22.0 |
|
|
23.8 |
|
(8 |
%) |
|||||
Corporate and Other |
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
(63 |
%) |
|
0.9 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
(36 |
%) |
|||||
Combined revenue |
$ |
135.6 |
|
$ |
163.2 |
|
(17 |
%) |
$ |
261.3 |
|
$ |
290.9 |
|
(10 |
%) |
|||||
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
(93.5 |
) |
|
(117.8 |
) |
|
|
(183.1 |
) |
|
(222.0 |
) |
|
|||||||
Adjustment for Oil and Gas |
|
1.6 |
|
|
6.0 |
|
(73 |
%) |
|
3.9 |
|
|
11.3 |
|
(65 |
%) |
|||||
Financial statement revenue |
$ |
43.7 |
|
$ |
51.4 |
|
(15 |
%) |
$ |
82.1 |
|
$ |
80.2 |
|
2 |
% |
(1) |
|
Revenue of Metals for the three months ended |
Adjusted EBITDA
The Corporation defines Adjusted EBITDA as earnings/loss from operations and joint venture, which excludes net finance expense, income tax expense and loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, as reported in the financial statements for the period, adjusted for: depletion, depreciation and amortization; impairment losses on non-current non-financial assets and investments; and gains or losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment of the Corporation and the Moa JV. The exclusion of impairment losses eliminates the non-cash impact of the losses.
Earnings/loss from operations at Oil and Gas (net of depletion, depreciation and amortization and impairment, if applicable) is deducted from/added back to Adjusted EBITDA as the segment is not currently exploring for or producing oil and gas and its financial results relate to ancillary drilling services, provided to a customer and agencies of the Government of
Management uses Adjusted EBITDA internally to evaluate the cash generation potential of Sherritt’s operating divisions on a combined and segment basis as an indicator of ability to fund working capital needs, meet covenant obligations, service debt and fund capital expenditures, as well as provide a level of comparability to similar entities. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors in evaluating the Corporation’s operating results in the same manner as management and the Board of Directors.
The tables below reconcile loss from operations and joint venture per the financial statements to Adjusted EBITDA:
$ millions, for the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|||||||||||||
|
Metals(1) |
|
Power |
|
Oil and Gas |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
Total |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
(Loss) earnings from operations and joint venture per financial statements |
$ |
(7.4 |
) |
$ |
4.3 |
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
$ |
(10.3 |
) |
$ |
(5.7 |
) |
$ |
(19.4 |
) |
||||||
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
2.7 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.5 |
|
||||||
Oil and Gas loss from operations, net of depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
0.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.3 |
|
||||||
Adjustments for share of earnings of Moa Joint Venture: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
12.5 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
12.5 |
|
||||||
Net finance expense |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
4.6 |
|
||||||
Income tax expense |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
7.8 |
|
$ |
5.0 |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(10.2 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, for the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Metals(1) |
Power |
Oil and Gas |
Corporate and Other |
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations and joint venture per financial statements |
$ |
2.7 |
$ |
1.2 |
$ |
1.7 |
|
$ |
(6.9 |
) |
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
$ |
(1.9 |
) |
|||||||
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
2.9 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|||||||
Oil and Gas earnings from operations, net of depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|||||||
Adjustments for share of earnings of Moa Joint Venture: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
11.9 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|||||||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment |
|
0.5 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|||||||
Net finance expense |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|||||||
Income tax expense |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ |
18.0 |
$ |
1.8 |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, for the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Metals(2) |
|
Power |
|
Oil and Gas |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
Total |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
(Loss) earnings from operations and joint venture per financial statements |
|
$ |
(16.0 |
) |
$ |
7.0 |
$ |
(19.0 |
) |
$ |
(15.1 |
) |
$ |
(8.1 |
) |
$ |
(51.2 |
) |
||||||
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
- |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
6.8 |
|
||||||
Oil and Gas loss from operations, net of depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
19.0 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
19.0 |
|
||||||
Adjustments for share of earnings of Moa Joint Venture: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
24.3 |
|
||||||
Net finance expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
6.2 |
|
||||||
Income tax expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
$ |
8.4 |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(14.7 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, for the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
||||||||||||
|
|
Metals(2) |
Power |
Oil and Gas |
Corporate and Other |
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
(Loss) earnings from operations and joint venture per financial statements |
|
|
$ |
(18.3 |
) |
$ |
8.3 |
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
$ |
(13.9 |
) |
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
(24.3 |
) |
||||||
Add (deduct): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
7.0 |
|
||||||
Oil and Gas loss from operations, net of depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
||||||
Adjustments for share of earnings of Moa Joint Venture: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
23.0 |
|
||||||
Impairment of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
||||||
Net finance income |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
(1.1 |
) |
||||||
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
$ |
9.4 |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(13.4 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA of Metals for the three months ended |
(2) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA of Metals for the six months ended |
Average-realized price
Average-realized price is generally calculated by dividing revenue by sales volume for the given product in a given segment. The average-realized price for power excludes frequency control, by-product and other revenue, as this revenue is not earned directly for power generation. Refer to the Power Review of operations section for further details on frequency control revenue, which Energas receives in compensation for lost sales of electricity as a result of frequency control.
Management uses this measure, and believes investors use this measure, to compare the relationship between the revenue per unit and direct costs on a per unit basis in each reporting period for nickel, cobalt, fertilizer and power and provide comparability with other similar external operations.
Average-realized price for fertilizer is the weighted-average realized price of ammonia and various ammonium sulphate products.
Average-realized price for nickel and cobalt are expressed in Canadian dollars per pound sold, while fertilizer is expressed in Canadian dollars per tonne sold and electricity is expressed in Canadian dollars per megawatt hour sold.
The tables below reconcile revenue per the financial statements to average-realized price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
$ millions, except average-realized price and sales volume, for the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
||||||||||||||
|
Metals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Nickel |
|
Cobalt |
|
Fertilizer |
|
Power |
|
|
Other(1) |
|
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
|
Total |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Revenue per financial statements |
$ |
68.6 |
$ |
15.2 |
$ |
30.0 |
$ |
10.6 |
|
$ |
12.8 |
$ |
(93.5 |
) |
$ |
43.7 |
||||||
Adjustments to revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Frequency control, by-product and other revenue |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Revenue for purposes of average-realized price calculation |
|
68.6 |
|
15.2 |
|
30.0 |
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Sales volume for the period |
|
7.2 |
|
0.8 |
|
44.6 |
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Volume units |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
|
Millions of pounds |
|
|
Thousands of tonnes |
|
|
Gigawatt hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Average-realized price(2)(3)(4) |
$ |
9.57 |
$ |
18.19 |
$ |
674.44 |
$ |
52.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, except average-realized price and sales volume, for the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
||||||||||||||
|
Metals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Nickel |
|
Cobalt |
|
Fertilizer |
|
Power |
|
|
Other(1) |
|
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
|
Total |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Revenue per financial statements |
$ |
94.0 |
$ |
12.3 |
$ |
34.8 |
$ |
11.8 |
|
$ |
16.3 |
$ |
(117.8 |
) |
$ |
51.4 |
||||||
Adjustments to revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
By-product and other revenue |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Revenue for purposes of average-realized price calculation |
|
94.0 |
|
12.3 |
|
34.8 |
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Sales volume for the period |
|
8.3 |
|
0.9 |
|
60.7 |
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Volume units |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
Thousands of tonnes |
|
Gigawatt hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Average-realized price(2)(3)(4) |
$ |
11.25 |
$ |
14.32 |
$ |
574.70 |
$ |
52.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, except average-realized price and sales volume, for the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
||||||||||||||
|
Metals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Nickel |
Cobalt |
Fertilizer |
Power |
|
Other(1) |
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
Total |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Revenue per financial statements |
$ |
144.3 |
$ |
28.6 |
$ |
45.9 |
$ |
22.0 |
|
$ |
24.4 |
$ |
(183.1 |
) |
$ |
82.1 |
||||||
Adjustments to revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Frequency control, by-product and other revenue |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Revenue for purposes of average-realized price calculation |
|
144.3 |
|
28.6 |
|
45.9 |
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Sales volume for the period |
|
14.8 |
|
2.0 |
|
77.7 |
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Volume units |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
Thousands of tonnes |
|
Gigawatt hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Average-realized price(2)(3)(4) |
$ |
9.78 |
$ |
15.51 |
$ |
591.10 |
$ |
53.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, except average-realized price and sales volume, for the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
||||||||||||||
|
Metals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Nickel |
Cobalt |
Fertilizer |
|
Power |
|
Other(1) |
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
Total |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Revenue per financial statements |
$ |
181.8 |
$ |
23.9 |
$ |
44.7 |
$ |
23.8 |
|
$ |
28.0 |
$ |
(222.0 |
) |
$ |
80.2 |
||||||
Adjustments to revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
By-product and other revenue |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Revenue for purposes of average-realized price calculation |
|
181.8 |
|
23.9 |
|
44.7 |
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Sales volume for the period |
|
17.2 |
|
1.7 |
|
84.6 |
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Volume units |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
Thousands of tonnes |
|
Gigawatt hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Average-realized price(2)(3)(4) |
$ |
10.55 |
$ |
14.41 |
$ |
528.73 |
$ |
51.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other revenue includes other revenue from the Metals reportable segment, revenue from the Oil and Gas reportable segment, a non-core reportable segment, and revenue from the Corporate and Other reportable segment. |
(2) |
|
Average-realized price may not calculate exactly based on amounts presented due to foreign exchange and rounding. |
(3) |
|
Power, average-realized price per MWh. |
(4) |
|
Fertilizer, average-realized price per tonne. |
Unit operating cost/Net direct cash cost
With the exception of Metals, which uses NDCC, unit operating cost is generally calculated by dividing cost of sales as reported in the financial statements, less depreciation, depletion and amortization in cost of sales, the impact of impairment losses, gains and losses on disposal of property, plant, and equipment and exploration and evaluation assets and certain other non-production related costs, by the number of units sold.
Metals’ NDCC is calculated by dividing cost of sales, as reported in the financial statements, adjusted for the following: depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment losses in cost of sales; cobalt by-product, fertilizer by-product and other revenue; cobalt gain/loss pursuant to the Cobalt Swap; realized gain/loss on natural gas swaps; royalties/territorial contributions; and other costs primarily related to the impact of opening and closing inventory values, by the number of finished nickel pounds sold in the period.
Unit operating costs for nickel and electricity are key measures that management and investors uses to monitor performance. NDCC of nickel is a widely-used performance measure for nickel producers. Management uses unit operating costs/NDCC to assess how well the Corporation’s producing mine and power facilities are performing and to assess overall production efficiency and effectiveness internally across periods and compared to its competitors.
Unit operating cost (NDCC) for nickel is expressed in
The tables below reconcile cost of sales per the financial statements to unit operating cost/NDCC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ millions, except unit cost and sales volume, for the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|||||||||
|
Metals |
|
Power |
|
Other(1) |
|
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
Total |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cost of sales per financial statements |
$ |
130.1 |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
$ |
2.4 |
$ |
(105.1 |
) |
$ |
32.4 |
||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization in cost of sales |
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
114.9 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Adjustments to cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cobalt by-product revenue - Moa JV and Cobalt Swap |
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Fertilizer by-product revenue |
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other revenue |
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Realized gain on natural gas swaps |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Royalties/territorial contributions and other non-cash costs(2) |
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Changes in inventories and other non-cash adjustments(3) |
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cost of sales for purposes of unit cost calculation |
|
52.7 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sales volume for the period |
|
7.2 |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Volume units |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
Gigawatt hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unit operating cost(4)(5) |
$ |
7.34 |
|
$ |
24.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Unit operating cost (US$ per pound) (NDCC)(6) |
$ |
5.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, except unit cost and sales volume, for the three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|||||||||
|
Metals |
|
|
Power |
|
|
Other(1) |
|
|
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
|
Total |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cost of sales per financial statements |
$ |
144.5 |
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
$ |
(116.6 |
) |
$ |
41.8 |
||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization in cost of sales |
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
129.7 |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Adjustments to cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cobalt by-product revenue - Moa JV and Cobalt Swap |
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Fertilizer by-product revenue |
|
(34.8 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other revenue |
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Royalties/territorial contributions and other non-cash costs(2) |
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Changes in inventories and other non-cash adjustments(3) |
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cost of sales for purposes of unit cost calculation |
|
65.0 |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sales volume for the period |
|
8.3 |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Volume units |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
Gigawatt hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unit operating cost(4)(5) |
$ |
7.87 |
|
$ |
42.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Unit operating cost (US$ per pound) (NDCC)(6) |
$ |
5.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, except unit cost and sales volume, for the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|||||||||
|
Metals |
|
|
Power |
|
|
Other(1) |
|
|
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
|
Total |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cost of sales per financial statements |
$ |
249.2 |
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
$ |
23.9 |
$ |
(201.9 |
) |
$ |
83.1 |
||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization in cost of sales |
|
(29.3 |
) |
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
219.9 |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Adjustments to cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cobalt by-product revenue - Moa JV and Cobalt Swap |
|
(28.6 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Fertilizer by-product revenue |
|
(45.9 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other revenue |
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cobalt loss |
|
0.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Realized gain on natural gas swaps |
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Royalties/territorial contributions and other non-cash costs(2) |
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Changes in inventories and other non-cash adjustments(3) |
|
1.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cost of sales for purposes of unit cost calculation |
|
117.7 |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sales volume for the period |
|
14.8 |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Volume units |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
Gigawatt hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unit operating cost(4)(5) |
$ |
7.97 |
|
$ |
31.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Unit operating cost (US$ per pound) (NDCC)(6) |
$ |
5.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, except unit cost and sales volume, for the six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|||||||||
|
|
Metals |
|
|
Power |
|
|
Other(1) |
|
|
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
|
Total |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cost of sales per financial statements |
$ |
275.6 |
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
$ |
12.9 |
$ |
(232.5 |
) |
$ |
69.3 |
||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Depletion, depreciation and amortization in cost of sales |
|
(28.3 |
) |
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
247.3 |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Adjustments to cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cobalt by-product revenue - Moa JV and Cobalt Swap |
|
(23.9 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Fertilizer by-product revenue |
|
(44.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other revenue |
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Royalties/territorial contributions and other non-cash costs(2) |
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Changes in inventories and other non-cash adjustments(3) |
|
2.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cost of sales for purposes of unit cost calculation |
|
151.9 |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sales volume for the period |
|
17.2 |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Volume units |
|
Millions of pounds |
|
Gigawatt hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Unit operating cost(4)(5) |
$ |
8.82 |
|
$ |
29.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Unit operating cost (US$ per pound) (NDCC)(6) |
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other cost of sales is composed of the cost of sales of Oil and Gas, a non-core reportable segment, and cost of sales of the Corporate and Other reportable segment. |
(2) |
|
Royalties/territorial contributions and other non-cash costs are included in cost of sales but are excluded from NDCC and consists of royalties, territorial contributions, inventory write-downs and other non-cash costs. |
(3) |
|
Changes in inventories and other non-cash adjustments is primarily composed of changes in inventories, the effect of average exchange rate changes and other non-cash items. These amounts are excluded from cost of sales but included in NDCC. |
(4) |
|
Unit operating cost/NDCC may not calculate exactly based on amounts presented due to foreign exchange and rounding. |
(5) |
|
Power, unit operating cost price per MWh. |
(6) |
|
Unit operating costs in US$ are converted at the average exchange rate for the period. |
Adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations and adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations per share
The Corporation defines adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations as net earnings/loss from continuing operations less items not reflective of the Corporation’s current or future operational performance. These adjusting items include, but are not limited to, inventory write-downs/obsolescence, impairment of assets, gains and losses on the acquisition or disposal of assets, unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses, gains and losses on financial assets and liabilities and other one-time adjustments that have not occurred in the past two years and are not expected to recur in the next two years. While some adjustments are recurring (such as unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss and revaluations of allowances for expected credit losses (ACL)), management believes that they do not reflect the Corporation’s current or future operational performance.
Net earnings/loss from continuing operations at Oil and Gas is deducted from/added back to adjusted earnings/loss from continuing operations as the segment is not currently exploring for or producing oil and gas and its financial results relate to ancillary drilling services, provided to a customer and agencies of the Government of
Adjusted net earnings/loss from continuing operations per share is defined consistent with the definition above and divided by the Corporation’s weighted-average number of common shares outstanding.
Management uses these measures internally and believes that they provide investors with performance measures with which to assess the Corporation’s current or future operational performance by adjusting for items or transactions that are not reflective of its current or future operational performance.
The tables below reconcile net earnings/loss from continuing operations and net earnings/loss from continuing operations per share, both per the financial statements, to adjusted net loss from continuing operations and adjusted net loss from continuing operations per share, respectively:
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
2024 |
|||||||
For the three months ended |
$ millions |
$/share |
$ millions |
$/share |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
$ |
10.4 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
(11.5 |
) |
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Adjusting items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Corporate and Other - Gain on Debt and Equity transactions, net of transaction costs |
|
(32.4 |
) |
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Reclassification of transaction costs on Debt and Equity Transactions to Gain on Debt and Equity Transactions |
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Corporate and Other - Gain on repurchase of PIK Notes |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|||
Corporate and Other - Unrealized gain on nickel put options |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|||
Metals - Moa JV - Impairment of property, plant and equipment |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Metals - Moa JV - Inventory write-down/obsolescence |
|
0.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Metals - Fort Site - Unrealized loss on natural gas swaps |
|
5.3 |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Metals - Fort Site - Realized gain on natural gas swaps |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Power - (Gain) loss on revaluation of GNC receivable |
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
7.9 |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|||
Power - Loss (gain) on revaluation of Energas payable |
|
2.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|||
Oil and Gas - Net loss (gain) from continuing operations, net of unrealized foreign exchange gain/loss |
|
0.7 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
- |
|
|||
Total adjustments, before tax |
$ |
(35.8 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
$ |
1.4 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|||
Tax adjustments |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Adjusted net loss from continuing operations |
$ |
(25.6 |
) |
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
$ |
(10.0 |
) |
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
||||
For the six months ended |
$ millions |
|
$/share |
|
$ millions |
|
$/share |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
$ |
(30.2 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
$ |
(52.4 |
) |
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Adjusting items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|||
Corporate and Other - Gain on Debt and Equity transactions, net of transaction costs |
|
(32.4 |
) |
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Corporate and Other - Unrealized gain on nickel put options |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|||
Corporate and Other - Gain on repurchase of PIK Notes |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
- |
|
|||
Metals - Moa JV - Impairment of property, plant and equipment |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Metals - Moa JV - Inventory write-down/obsolescence |
|
0.5 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|||
Metals - Moa JV - Cobalt loss |
|
0.3 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Metals - Fort Site - Inventory write-down |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Metals - Fort Site - Unrealized loss on natural gas swaps |
|
1.8 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Metals - Fort Site - Realized gain on natural gas swaps |
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Power - (Gain) loss on revaluation of GNC receivable |
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
18.4 |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|||
Power - Loss (gain) on revaluation of Energas payable |
|
2.8 |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|||
Oil and Gas - Net loss from continuing operations, net of unrealized foreign exchange gain/loss |
|
19.4 |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
- |
|
|||
Total adjustments, before tax |
$ |
(17.1 |
) |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
$ |
18.1 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|||
Tax adjustments |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
- |
|
|||
Adjusted net loss from continuing operations |
$ |
(47.8 |
) |
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
$ |
(34.6 |
) |
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Spending on capital
The Corporation defines spending on capital for each segment as property, plant and equipment and intangible asset expenditures on a cash basis adjusted to the accrual basis in order to account for assets that are available for use by the Corporation and the Moa Joint Venture prior to payment and includes adjustments to accruals. The Metals segment’s spending on capital includes the Fort Site’s expenditures, plus the Corporation’s 50% share of the Moa Joint Venture’s expenditures, which is accounted for using the equity method for accounting purposes.
Combined spending on capital is the aggregate of each segment’s spending on capital or the Corporation’s consolidated property, plant and equipment and intangible asset expenditures and the property, plant and equipment and intangible asset expenditures of the Moa Joint Venture on a 50% basis, all adjusted to the accrual basis.
Combined spending on capital is used by management, and management believes this information is used by investors, to analyze the Corporation and the Moa Joint Venture’s investments in non-current assets that are held for use in the production of nickel, cobalt, fertilizers, oil and gas and power generation.
The tables below reconcile property, plant and equipment and intangible asset expenditures per the financial statements to combined spending on capital, expressed in Canadian dollars:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
$ millions, for the three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
||||||||
|
Metals |
|
Power |
|
Other(1) |
|
Combined total |
|
Adjustment for Moa
|
|
Total derived from financial statements |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures(2) |
$ |
13.6 |
$ |
0.8 |
$ |
- |
$ |
14.4 |
$ |
(10.0 |
) |
$ |
4.4 |
|||||
Intangible asset expenditures(2) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|||||
|
|
13.6 |
|
0.8 |
|
- |
|
14.4 |
$ |
(10.0 |
) |
$ |
4.4 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Accrual adjustment |
|
1.3 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Spending on capital |
$ |
14.9 |
$ |
0.8 |
$ |
- |
$ |
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, for the three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
||||||||
|
Metals |
|
Power |
|
Other(1) |
|
Combined total |
|
Adjustment for Moa
|
|
Total derived from financial statements |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures(2) |
$ |
7.7 |
$ |
1.5 |
$ |
- |
$ |
9.2 |
$ |
(7.6 |
) |
$ |
1.6 |
|||||
Intangible asset expenditures(2) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|||||
|
|
7.7 |
|
1.5 |
|
- |
|
9.2 |
$ |
(7.6 |
) |
$ |
1.6 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Accrual adjustment |
|
0.1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Spending on capital |
$ |
7.8 |
$ |
1.5 |
$ |
- |
$ |
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, for the six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
||||||||
|
Metals |
|
Power |
|
Other(1) |
|
Combined total |
|
Adjustment for Moa
|
|
Total derived from financial statements |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures(2) |
$ |
24.1 |
$ |
0.9 |
$ |
0.1 |
$ |
25.1 |
$ |
(17.6 |
) |
$ |
7.5 |
|||||
Intangible asset expenditures(2) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|||||
|
|
24.1 |
|
0.9 |
|
0.1 |
|
25.1 |
$ |
(17.6 |
) |
$ |
7.5 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Accrual adjustment |
|
6.1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Spending on capital |
$ |
30.2 |
$ |
0.9 |
$ |
0.1 |
$ |
31.2 |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ millions, for the six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
||||||||||
|
Metals |
|
|
Power |
|
|
Other(1) |
|
|
Combined total |
|
|
Adjustment for Moa
|
|
|
Total derived from financial statements |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures(2) |
$ |
17.2 |
$ |
4.1 |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
21.3 |
|
$ |
(16.0 |
) |
$ |
5.3 |
|||||
Intangible asset expenditures(2) |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.2 |
|||||
|
|
17.2 |
|
4.1 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
21.5 |
|
$ |
(16.0 |
) |
$ |
5.5 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Accrual adjustment |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Spending on capital |
$ |
17.2 |
$ |
4.1 |
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes property, plant and equipment and intangible asset expenditures of the Oil and Gas reportable segment, which is non-core, and the Corporate and Other reportable segment. |
(2) |
|
Total property, plant and equipment expenditures and total intangible asset expenditures as presented in the Corporation’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flow. |
Combined cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities and combined free cash flow
The Corporation defines cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities by segment as cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities for each segment calculated in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards and adjusted to remove the impact of cash provided (used) by wholly-owned subsidiaries. Combined cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities is the aggregate of each segment’s cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities including the Corporation’s 50% share of the Moa JV’s cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities, which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting and excluded from consolidated cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities.
The Corporation defines free cash flow for each segment as cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities by segment, less cash expenditures on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, including exploration and evaluation assets. Combined free cash flow is the aggregate of each segment’s free cash flow or the Corporation’s consolidated cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities, less consolidated cash expenditures on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, including exploration and evaluation assets, less distributions received from Moa JV, plus cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities for the Corporation’s 50% share of the Moa JV, less cash expenditures on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets for the Corporation’s 50% share of the Moa JV.
The Corporate and Other segment’s cash used by continuing operations for operating activities is adjusted to exclude distributions received from Moa JV. Distributions from the Moa JV excluded from Corporate and Other are included in the Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture to arrive at total cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities per the financial statements.
The Metals segment’s free cash flow includes the Fort Site and Metals Marketing’s free cash flow, plus the Corporation’s 50% share of the Moa JV’s free cash flow, which is accounted for using the equity method for accounting purposes.
Combined cash provided/used by continuing operations for operating activities and combined free cash flow are used by management, and management believes this information is used by investors, to analyze cash flows generated from operations and assess its operations’ ability to provide cash or its use of cash, and in the case of combined free cash flow, after funding cash capital requirements, to service current and future working capital needs and service debt.
The tables below reconcile combined cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities to cash provided (used) by continuing operations per the financial statements to combined free cash flow:
$ millions, for the three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Metals(1)(2) |
|
Power |
|
Oil and Gas |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
Combined total |
|
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
|
Total derived from financial statements |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities |
|
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
$ |
(17.7 |
) |
$ |
17.2 |
|
$ |
(11.6 |
) |
$ |
5.6 |
|
||||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures |
|
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
10.0 |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
||||||
Free cash flow |
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
15.2 |
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
$ |
(17.7 |
) |
$ |
2.8 |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
$ |
1.2 |
|
$ millions, for the three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Metals(1)(2) |
Power |
Oil and Gas |
Corporate and Other |
Combined total |
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
Total derived from financial statements |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities |
|
|
$ |
21.2 |
|
$ |
(7.8 |
) |
$ |
(14.8 |
) |
$ |
(16.4 |
) |
$ |
(17.8 |
) |
$ |
(20.0 |
) |
$ |
(37.8 |
) |
||||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures |
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
7.6 |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
||||||
Free cash flow |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
$ |
(9.3 |
) |
$ |
(14.8 |
) |
$ |
(16.4 |
) |
$ |
(27.0 |
) |
$ |
(12.4 |
) |
$ |
(39.4 |
) |
$ millions, for the six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Metals(3)(4) |
Power |
Oil and Gas |
Corporate and Other |
Combined total |
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
Total derived from financial statements |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities |
|
|
$ |
41.9 |
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
$ |
(11.4 |
) |
$ |
(26.1 |
) |
$ |
21.3 |
|
$ |
(14.7 |
) |
$ |
6.6 |
|
||||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures |
|
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
|
17.6 |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
||||||
Free cash flow |
|
|
$ |
17.8 |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
$ |
(11.5 |
) |
$ |
(26.1 |
) |
$ |
(3.8 |
) |
$ |
2.9 |
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
$ millions, for the six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Metals(3)(4) |
Power |
Oil and Gas |
Corporate and Other |
Combined total |
Adjustment for Moa Joint Venture |
|
Total derived from financial statements |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Cash provided (used) by continuing operations for operating activities |
|
|
$ |
52.4 |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
$ |
(18.8 |
) |
$ |
(25.2 |
) |
$ |
10.3 |
|
$ |
(35.1 |
) |
$ |
(24.8 |
) |
||||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment expenditures |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
16.0 |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
||||||
Intangible expenditures |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
||||||
Free cash flow |
|
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
$ |
(19.0 |
) |
$ |
(25.2 |
) |
$ |
(11.2 |
) |
$ |
(19.1 |
) |
$ |
(30.3 |
) |
(1) |
|
Cash provided by continuing operations for operating activities for the Moa JV, Fort Site and Metals Marketing was $11.6 million, $10.0 million and $(1.6) million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2025 (June 30, 2024 - $20.0 million, $0.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively). |
(2) |
|
Property, plant and equipment expenditures and intangible expenditures for the Moa JV, Fort Site and Metals Marketing was $10.0 million, $3.6 million and nil, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2025 (June 30, 2024 - $7.5 million, $0.2 million and nil, respectively). |
(3) |
|
Cash provided by continuing operations for operating activities for the Moa JV, Fort Site and Metals Marketing was $14.7 million, $17.6 million and $9.6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2025 (June 30, 2024 - $35.1 million, $12.0 million and $5.3 million, respectively). |
(4) |
|
Property, plant and equipment expenditures and intangible expenditures for the Moa JV, Fort Site and Metals Marketing was $17.6 million, $6.5 million and nil, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2025 (June 30, 2024 - $16.0 million, $1.2 million and nil, respectively). |
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250728686440/en/
For further investor information contact:
Director, Investor Relations and Corporate Affairs
Telephone: (416) 935-2451
Toll-free: 1 (800) 704-6698
E-mail: investor@sherritt.com
Bay Adelaide Centre, East Tower
22
www.sherritt.com
Source: