FTC LAWSUIT VS. GRAND CANYON DISMISSED AGAINST ALL PARTIES
Decision fully exonerates GCU after years of politically motivated lawfare
by
The lawsuit, which had already been dismissed by the
In a unanimous ruling issued by
GCU President
"As we have stated from the beginning, not only were these accusations false, but the opposite is true," Mueller said. "We go above and beyond what is required in our disclosures and are recognized as a leader in this area."
GCU has also maintained that the allegations were a coordinated effort by former officials within the
"They threw everything they had at us for four years, and yet, despite every unjust accusation leveled against us, we have not only survived but have continued to thrive as a university," Mueller said. "That is a testament, first and foremost, to the strength and dedication of our faculty, staff, students and their families. Above all, it speaks to our unwavering belief that the truth would ultimately prevail."
BACKGROUND: A COORDINATED CAMPAIGN
Shortly after GCU filed a lawsuit against the
Those agencies, under the guise of "consumer protection," collectively launched five investigations against GCU in what essentially were fishing expeditions requesting voluminous amounts of information in hopes of uncovering wrongdoing. Each claim by one agency subsequently triggered copycat lawsuits and investigations by the other agencies for the same claim, flooding GCU with duplicative allegations and forcing the university to expend thousands of employee hours and millions of dollars to defend itself.
The major "findings" of those inquiries — which were related to GCU's doctoral disclosures and nonprofit status — have now been repeatedly discredited or dismissed by multiple agencies and courts.
Doctoral program disclosures:
GCU's financial disclosures around continuation courses in its doctoral programs — which are common in higher education — were deemed a "substantial misrepresentation" by former ED officials despite the fact that GCU provides more transparency than is legally required or that other universities typically provide. The same allegations, which resulted in an unprecedented fine of
Numerous independent agencies and courts have refuted or dismissed those accusations:
- Similar doctoral claims were rejected by both the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and 11thCircuit Court of Appeals in a parallel case (Young v. GCU). - GCU's accrediting body, the
Higher Learning Commission (HLC), described GCU's disclosures as "robust and thorough" in its 2021 comprehensive review. - A 2024 review of GCU's disclosures and processes by the
Arizona State Approving Agency for the Department of Veterans Affairs found "no substantiated findings." - Finally, in
March 2025 , ED itself rescinded the proposed fine, with prejudice — finding no wrongdoing by GCU and confirming that the university did not violate any Title IV requirements. ED stated: "Unlike the previous administration, we will not persecute and prosecute colleges and universities based on their religious affiliation."
Notably, former ED officials, including Federal Student Aid Chief Operating Officer
Nonprofit status:
GCU's 2018 return to its historic status as a 501(c)(3) Arizona nonprofit institution, which followed a lawful and transparent process, was repeatedly contested by ED and cited again in the
-
IRS -
State of Arizona - HLC
-
Arizona Board for Private Postsecondary Education -
NCAA Athletics - Independent evaluations from two nationally recognized accounting/finance firms confirmed the nonprofit transaction was at fair market value and would benefit the university.
- GCU's status was further validated when a three-judge panel of the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously inNovember 2024 that ED lacked the authority under the Higher Education Act to apply the legal standard it used in making such a determination and remanded it back to the Department to apply the correct standard. - And, in
May 2025 , theIRS reaffirmed GCU's status after completing a comprehensive four-year audit of the university.
In light of the Ninth Circuit ruling and
A
Second (2024) and third (2025)
A LARGER PATTERN
The disturbing pattern in the allegations brought by former agency officials in the
"This was not about protecting students and went well beyond normal regulatory activity," Mueller said. "The language used by these officials, the record fines they sought, and the baseless accusations they made all point to a broader ideological agenda."
This 2024 commentary from the
"The real motivation for department bureaucrats seems clear: even if they can't prove their allegations against GCU, they intend for the process to be the punishment."
LOOKING FORWARD
With the
"We support common sense government oversight but we vehemently reject ideologically driven, weaponized government actions that are not applied equally and equitably to all institutions," Mueller said. "As an institution that has a strong record of cooperation and great relationships with 26 different regulatory and accrediting bodies, we are doing an exemplary job of addressing the many challenges that are plaguing higher education while also living out our Christian mission both on our campus and in the surrounding community. That is reflected in the growing demand from students and families who are seeking a higher education option at GCU that is affordable and taught from a Christian worldview perspective. That mission, not politics, is our motivation and we look forward to putting our full attention to those efforts in the future."
About
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ftc-lawsuit-vs-grand-canyon-dismissed-against-all-parties-302531464.html
SOURCE