Minsud reports significant mineral resources growth at Chita Valley Deposits
TSX-V: MSR
On a consolidated and attributable basis, contained metal in the Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource categories totaled:
-
Indicated Resources: 1,033 Kt copper equivalent, consisting of 540 kt Cu, 8.0 kt Mo, 73.2
MOz Ag , 754 kOz Au, and 375 kt Zn; and - Inferred Resources: 3,333 kt of copper equivalent, consisting of 2,024 kt Cu, 65.4 kt Mo, 195.8 MOz of Ag, 2,051 kOz of Au, 719 kt of Zn.
Highlights
Chinchillones Polymetallic (Cu-Zn-Ag-Au Deposit)
-
Indicated Resources: 30.7 % increase; 1,014 kt CuEq consisting of 521 kt Cu, 8.0 kt Mo, 73.2
MOz Ag , 754 kOz Au and 375 kt Zn @ 0.44 CuEq % (0.22 % Cu, 10.1 ppm Ag, 0.1 ppm Au, 34.3 ppm Mo, 0.16% Zn). -
Inferred Resources: 37.8% increase; 2,823 kt CuEq consisting of 1,514 kt Cu, 65.4 kt Mo, 195.8
MOz Ag , 2,051 kOz Au and 719kt Zn @ 0.36 CuEq % (0.19% Cu, 8.1 ppm Ag, 0.08 ppm Au, 83.7 ppm Mo, 0.09% Zn). - The resources are considered suitable for open-pit mining and flotation process, based on Net Smelter Return cutoffs, with copper equivalent calculated post-estimation using the same pricing and recovery parameters as for the NSR.
- Copper, silver, and gold are the primary contributors to the Mineral Resource Estimate, with molybdenum and zinc as secondary contributors.
- Mineralization remains open at depth, with further molybdenum potential identified in unexplored areas.
- High-grade breccias remain under-drilled and open along strike, up- and down-dip.
Chita South Porphyry (PSU) Supergene-enriched Deposit (Cu)
- Indicated Resources: 19 kt Cu @ 0.30% Cu
- Inferred Resources: 510 kt Cu @ 0.29% Cu
- Mineralization remains open at depth, with further coherent molybdenum potential identified in the deposit's central area.
- Mineralization appears open along strike to the southwest with significant surface geochemistry.
Mineral Resource Estimates (MRE)
A mineral resource estimate on Chinchillones was previously completed by
The total combined summary MRE for the
- Chinchillones low zinc geological domain -
US$10.00 /tonne - Chinchillones high zinc geological domain -
US$11.65 /tonne - PSU secondary enriched domain –
US$7.10 /tonne
Both the
The updated Mineral Resource Estimate was prepared by Mr.
Table
1
:
Chinchillones Mineral Resource Estimate as at
|
Domain |
Classification |
M Tonnes |
CuEq |
Cu (%) |
Ag (g/t) |
Au (g/t) |
Mo |
Zn (%) |
|
Low |
Indicated |
177 |
0.37 |
0.24 |
8.1 |
0.10 |
45.1 |
0.0 |
|
Inferred |
681 |
0.32 |
0.19 |
6.8 |
0.08 |
96.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
High |
Indicated |
56 |
0.63 |
0.17 |
15.1 |
0.11 |
0.0 |
0.67 |
|
Inferred |
101 |
0.64 |
0.19 |
14.5 |
0.09 |
0.0 |
0.71 |
|
|
Total |
Indicated |
233 |
0.44 |
0.22 |
10.1 |
0.10 |
34.3 |
0.16 |
|
Inferred |
782 |
0.36 |
0.19 |
8.1 |
0.08 |
83.7 |
0.09 |
Table
2
:
Chinchillones Mineral Resource Estimate as at
|
Domain |
Classification |
M Tonnes |
CuEq |
Cu |
Ag M Oz |
Au k Oz |
Mo |
Zn Metal kt |
|
Low |
Indicated |
177 |
662 |
428 |
46.0 |
562 |
8.0 |
0.0 |
|
Inferred |
681 |
2,176 |
1,321 |
148.8 |
1,768 |
65.4 |
0.0 |
|
|
High |
Indicated |
56 |
352 |
93 |
27.3 |
192 |
0.0 |
375 |
|
Inferred |
101 |
647 |
193 |
47.0 |
283 |
0.0 |
719 |
|
|
Total |
Indicated |
233 |
1,014 |
521 |
73.2 |
754 |
8.0 |
375 |
|
Inferred |
782 |
2,823 |
1,514 |
195.8 |
2,051 |
65.4 |
719 |
Table 3:
Chita South Porphyry (PSU) Mineral Resource Estimate as at
|
Domain |
Classification |
M Tonnes |
CuEq |
CuEq |
Ag (g/t) |
Au (g/t) |
Mo |
Zn (%) |
|
Enriched |
Indicated |
7 |
19 |
0.30 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Enriched |
Inferred |
174 |
510 |
0.29 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
Indicated |
7 |
19 |
0.30 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Inferred |
174 |
510 |
0.29 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Table 4:
Chita Valley Total Mineral Resource Estimate as at
|
Classification |
M Tonnes |
CuEq (%) |
Cu (%) |
Ag (g/t) |
Au (g/t) |
Mo (ppm) |
Zn (%) |
|
Indicated |
240 |
0.43 |
0.23 |
9.8 |
0.1 |
33.3 |
0.16 |
|
Inferred |
955 |
0.35 |
0.21 |
6.6 |
0.07 |
68.4 |
0.08 |
Table 5:
Chita Valley Total Mineral Resource Estimate as at
|
Classification |
M Tonnes |
CuEq Metal kt |
Cu Metal kt |
Ag M Oz |
Au K Oz |
Mo Metal kt |
Zn Metal kt |
|
Indicated |
240 |
1,033 |
540 |
73.2 |
754 |
8 |
375 |
|
Inferred |
955 |
3,333 |
2,024 |
195.8 |
2,051 |
65.4 |
719 |
|
Notes : |
|
|
(1) |
The Qualified Person for the Mineral Resource Estimate is |
|
(2) |
The Mineral Resource estimate is reported on a 100% basis for the joint venture company |
|
(3) |
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues. It is noted that no specific issues have been identified as yet. |
|
(4) |
The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. |
|
(5) |
|
|
(6) |
The resource is reported above Net Smelter Return (NSR) cut offs – for the low zinc geological domain |
|
(7) |
The metal prices used for the NSR calculation in US$ are |
|
(8) |
The copper equivalent (CuEq) grades use the metal prices and recoveries as used for the NSR calculation; for the low zinc domain CuEq_% = Cu_% +(Au_ppm x 0.4603) + (Ag_ppm x 0.0093) + (Mo_ppm x 0.00026). For the high zinc domain, CuEq_% = Cu_% +(Au_ppm x 0.6675) + (Ag_ppm x 0.0146) + (Zn_% x 0.000026). Note that Zn is not recovered in the low zinc domain, and Mo is not recovered in the high zinc domain at Chinchillones. For the enriched secondary domain at PSU CuEq_% = Cu_%. |
|
(9) |
The value contribution of each metal to the project can be derived from the NSR calculation. These are: Cu 59%, Ag 20%, Au 11%, Mo 6%, Zn 4%. |
|
(10) |
The figures in the above tables may not add up due to rounding. |
Geological Data
Chinchillones
For the NSR calculations at Chinchillones, the geological domains were separated into low and high zinc domains – most of the resource is within the low zinc domain, with the high zinc domain a smaller discrete zone. Copper concentrate would be sourced from both the low and high zinc domains, but it was assumed that zinc concentrate would only be sourced from the high zinc geological domain, with different recoveries and processing costs compared to the low zinc domain.
Lithological and alteration 3D models do not strongly control copper mineralization, as grades vary significantly within and across these domains, making them unsuitable for estimation. To address this, a Cu-As-Ag high-sulfidation envelope was created using a proxy based on Cu, As, Sb, S, and Fe, enabling the identification of high-sulfidation signatures in both drilling and block models. Additional Mo and Zn-Pb grade shell envelopes were also developed. The final estimation domains are combinations of the high-sulfidation and Mo/Zn-Pb grade shells, as defined through statistical similarities and domain boundary analysis.
Chita South Porphyry (PSU)
For the secondary enriched domain, it was assumed that only copper cathode would be recovered (75%) with no other by-products recovered. Additional metallurgical testwork will be conducted at PSU to ascertain amenability of the immature supergene-enriched domain at PSU to flotation and conventional leaching test.
Principal Supergene-enrichment Domains Characteristics.
- The largely immature supergene-enriched zone extends 1.2kms x 1.1kms. It is characterised by the presence of chalcocite-digenite and covellite in quartz-sulfide veins/veinlets and as multitudes of minute disseminations. The supergene-enriched domain ranges from 10 to 150m thick.
- The leached capping is up to 50m thick and consists of variable amounts of hematite, goethite and jarosite with minor supergene copper minerals.
- The supergene clays, (kaolinite, illite and smectite and iron sulfates) make up less than 5 vol% of rock; the subdued supergene clay content contributes to the high copper recoveries (>80%, up to 95%) achieved in the metallurgical leaching tests and sequential copper analyses.
Mr.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
All core samples were cut and prepared on-site at the project area. The sample lengths were usually 2 m, except in areas with low recovery (loss areas, faults, etc.) and breaks from discrete principal geological features (e.g., vein, vein breccia). Drill core sizes of the drillholes included in this report are all HQ.
Cutting was carried out by trained
All core samples were submitted to the ALS Patagonia S.A. in Mendoza as the primary laboratory for sample preparation. This ISO 9001 accredited facility, with the prepared pulp samples sent to ALS Perú S.A. in
The analytical protocols are outlined as follows:
- ME-MS61 and ME-MS61m: Multi-trace analyses of 48 elements with a 4-acid digestion. A prepared sample (0.25 g) is digested with perchloric, nitric, and hydrofluoric acids to dryness. The residue is taken up in a volume of 12.5 mL of 10 % hydrochloric acid. The resulting solution is analyzed by ICP-AES. Results are corrected for spectral interelement interference.
- ME-OG62: For samples over-limit, analysis is with four acid digestion using conventional ICPAES analysis for Ag, As, Cu, Mo, S, Pb, and Zn.
- Fire Assay Procedure Au-AA24 (50g): Gold is analyzed using a conventional fire assay fusion method with Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS).
MSA followed industry standard procedures for the work with a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program. Field duplicates, standards and blanks were included with all sample shipments to the principal laboratory. MSA detected no significant QA/QC issues during review of the data.
Qualified Persons and Technical Information
The site visit, including the review of geological aspects such as sampling, drill core, logging, assay laboratory procedures, and independent check samples, was conducted by Mr.
The Mineral Resource Estimate was prepared by Mr.
The scientific and technical information in this press release has been compiled, reviewed and approved by Dr
The Qualified Persons responsible for the technical report and its various chapters have reviewed and approved the contents of this release.
The full technical report, prepared by Cube in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI-43-101"), will be filed on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) under the Company's issuer profile within 45 days of this news release. The Mineral Resource Estimate is effective as of
About the
About
Minsud is a mineral exploration company focused on exploring its flagship
About South32 Limited
South32 Limited is a globally diversified mining and minerals company. The company's purpose is to make a difference by developing natural resources, improving people's lives now and for generations to come. South32 Limited is trusted by its owners and partners to realise the potential of their resources. South32 Limited produces minerals and metals critical to the world's energy transition from operations across the
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION:
This news release includes certain information that may constitute forward-looking information under applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements about strategic plans, spending commitments, future operations, results of exploration, anticipated financial results, future work programs, capital expenditures and objectives. Forward-looking information is necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information including, but not limited to: fluctuations in the currency markets (such as the Canadian dollar, Argentina peso, and the
Neither the
SOURCE