Copper Giant Targets New Porphyry Centers Beyond Mocoa Resource with Third Drill Rig
- Third drill rig mobilized to test undrilled porphyry targets beyond the current resource footprint. Mobilization is expected to begin in the coming weeks.
-
First-ever drill testing of
La Estrella and Piedralisa. Two of nine priority targets identified across a district shaped by approximately ten million years of fertile magmatic activity. - Marks transitions to systematic district-scale exploration while resource growth and conversion continue with two rigs at full capacity.
"The addition of a third drill rig reflects the confidence we are building in the broader Mocoa system. Targets like
Strategic Context
The mobilization of a third drill rig reflects the Company's growing confidence in the scale potential of the Mocoa porphyry system and represents the next step in executing its 2026 exploration strategy (refer to news release dated
The La
The
|
Sample ID |
Cu (ppm) |
Mo (ppm) |
Easting |
Northing |
Elevation |
Release Reference |
Target |
|
R00018 |
90.11 |
42.66 |
314640 |
135624 |
1047 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00167 |
3646.61 |
265.74 |
314418 |
136592 |
1248 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00210 |
780.48 |
30.27 |
313900 |
135930 |
1140 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00329 |
670.83 |
50.21 |
314617 |
136896 |
1523 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00331 |
342.32 |
64.88 |
314615 |
136894 |
1515 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00332 |
566.6 |
158.86 |
314614 |
136892 |
1509 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00333 |
612.33 |
75.53 |
314612 |
136892 |
1509 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00357 |
207.2 |
57.08 |
315493 |
136183 |
1171 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00567 |
43.41 |
49.48 |
314507 |
136801 |
1411 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00574 |
3473.23 |
332.5 |
314928 |
136508 |
1207 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00577 |
719.59 |
30.18 |
315666 |
136331 |
1224 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00670 |
31.43 |
56.02 |
315626 |
136804 |
1362 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00751 |
8.11 |
42.5 |
314258 |
136529 |
1141 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00780 |
281.82 |
46.48 |
314527 |
136490 |
1316 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00790 |
62.93 |
31.65 |
314254 |
136309 |
1053 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00806 |
321.46 |
44.19 |
314734 |
137134 |
1579 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00825 |
61.24 |
34.25 |
314120 |
136353 |
1150 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00832 |
29.74 |
41.08 |
314159 |
136326 |
1175 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00833 |
40.16 |
98.42 |
314161 |
136325 |
1175 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00837 |
5.54 |
42.79 |
314347 |
136030 |
1062 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00839 |
973.53 |
32.58 |
314249 |
136793 |
1194 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00843 |
298.52 |
47.13 |
314192 |
136619 |
1151 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00868 |
1280.91 |
14.77 |
314500 |
136548 |
1312 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00876 |
41.59 |
89.84 |
315154 |
136893 |
1312 |
|
Piedralisa |
|
R00878 |
163.85 |
60.7 |
313654 |
137122 |
1533 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00879 |
477.36 |
51.98 |
313654 |
137124 |
1533 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00880 |
135.47 |
43.8 |
313653 |
137126 |
1533 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00882 |
191.63 |
31.37 |
313653 |
137133 |
1553 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00885 |
131.99 |
33.28 |
313651 |
137135 |
1553 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00954 |
44.29 |
46.78 |
314137 |
136897 |
1195 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00959 |
174.47 |
32.46 |
314135 |
136907 |
1195 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00966 |
80.78 |
30.28 |
314134 |
136916 |
1195 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00967 |
349.95 |
31.11 |
314133 |
136918 |
1195 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00970 |
42.37 |
71.14 |
314132 |
136927 |
1195 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00974 |
37.56 |
65.38 |
314132 |
136927 |
1195 |
|
Estrella |
|
R00980 |
1105.04 |
10.2 |
314148 |
136926 |
1222 |
|
Estrella |
|
Table 1. Assay results for rock samples from the |
Piedralisa Target
The Piedralisa target, located approximately 3 km southeast of the Mocoa deposit, represents a second high-priority target within the broader cluster (Figure 2). Surface prospecting has defined a Cu–Mo geochemical anomaly, with rock samples returning up to 1,280 ppm Cu and 89.8 ppm Mo, supported by coincident soil anomalies and hydrothermal alteration (Table 1). Mineralization is hosted in sericite-altered volcanic and intrusive rocks with local quartz-sulfide veining consistent with porphyry-style systems. The target is spatially associated with regional structural corridors and geophysical features interpreted to be favorable for porphyry emplacement. Initial drilling will test for concealed porphyry intrusions and evaluate its potential as an additional mineralized center within the Mocoa project.
Engagement of
Copper Giant is also pleased to announce that subject to approval of the
Under the Agreement, the Company will pay
Qualified Person and Technical Notes
Copper Giant operates according to a rigorous Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) protocol consistent with industry best practices. For surface samples, 2.5kg of material is taken on each outcrop using chip or channel techniques. Samples are taken by well-trained field helpers supervised by the geologist of the company. Core diameter is a mix of HQ and NQ depending on the depth of the drill hole. Diamond drill core boxes were photographed, sawed, sampled and tagged in maximum 2-metre intervals, stopping in geological boundaries. Samples were bagged, tagged and packaged for shipment by truck from Copper Giant's core logging facilities in Mocoa,
Inferred Mineral Resources are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Inferred Mineral Resources will be upgraded to an Indicated or Measured category.
Copper equivalent (CuEq) for drill hole interceptions is calculated as: CuEq (%) = Cu (%) + 5.278 × Mo (%), utilizing metal prices of Cu -
1 Notes on the MRE of the project
- The MRE was completed by
Kevin Hon ,B.Sc .,P.Geo ., Senior Resource Geologist, andWarren Black ,M.Sc .,P.Geo ., Senior Consultant: Mineral Resources and Geostatistics, both of APEX.Mr. Hon andMr. Black are independent Qualified Persons, as defined by NI 43-101, and are responsible for the completion of the Mineral Resource Estimate, with an effective date ofNovember 18, 2025 .Michael Dufresne ,M.Sc .,P.Geo ., President & CEO of APEX, completed a peer review of the estimate. - Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
- The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
- The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral Resource could potentially be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with continued exploration.
-
The Mineral Resources were estimated in accordance with theCanadian Institute of Mining , Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines (2019) prepared by theCIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by theCIM Council . - Economic assumptions used include
US$4.00 /lb Cu,US$20.00 /lb Mo, process recoveries of 90% for Cu and 95% for Mo, aUS$10 /t processing cost, G&A costs ofUS$1.00 /t, and a 3% NSR royalty - CuEq* values are calculated using a Cu-to-Mo value ratio of 1:5.278, incorporating both metal prices and metallurgical recoveries.
- The constraining pit optimization parameters include a
US$2.5 /t mining cost for both mineralized and waste material and 45° slopes. Pit-constrained Mineral Resources are reported at a cutoff of 0.25% CuEq*.
About the Mocoa Porphyry System
Mocoa was first identified in 1973 through a regional geochemical survey conducted by the
The deposit is hosted in Middle Jurassic dacite and quartz-diorite porphyries intruding andesitic to dacitic volcanics of the Central Cordillera, a 30-kilometre-wide tectonic belt that extends into
A distinguishing geological feature of Mocoa is the presence of a fertile magmatic window spanning roughly ten million years, a prolonged and unusually productive interval of magma generation and evolution that is not commonly observed in other Jurassic porphyry systems within the same belt. This extended fertile period provides a compelling explanation for the system's large metal endowment, broad alteration footprint, and overlapping intrusive and hydrothermal events.
The deposit demonstrates more than 1,000 metres of vertical continuity, with multiple intrusive phases, brecciation episodes, and vein generations reflecting a dynamic and long-lived magmatic–hydrothermal evolution, likely influenced by more than one porphyry center. Mocoa remains open in all directions, and several satellite targets across the broader land package support the interpretation of a district-scale mineralized system.
Mocoa's Mineral Resource Estimate1 comprises Inferred resources of 12.7 billion pounds (Blbs) copper-equivalent (CuEq*) at an average grade of 0.51% CuEq*, including 7.7 Blbs of copper at 0.31% Cu and 1.0 Blbs of molybdenum at 0.039% Mo, within 1,120 million tonnes (Mt).
1 For further information refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report, entitled "Technical Report and Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for
About Copper Giant
The Company is led by a team with uncommon experience, having successfully taken some of the few major copper mines developed in the past two decades from discovery through to construction.
Copper Giant's current focus is the Mocoa copper-molybdenum deposit in southern Colombia, one of the largest undeveloped resources of its kind in the
Guided by the values of respect and responsibility, and grounded in its Good Neighbor philosophy, Copper Giant is committed to creating enduring values for all stakeholders and playing a meaningful role in the global energy transition.
Neither the
This news release includes forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements within, other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding the third rig drill mobilization timing and outcome, the testing and outcome of
SOURCE