Copper Giant Expands Mocoa Resource Footprint and Advances Connector Zone Toward The La Estrella With Three Drill Rigs Turning
- MD-062 intersected 411 metres of 0.56% CuEq* (0.31% Cu and 0.05% Mo) from the kick-off point, including 258 metres of 0.70% CuEq* (0.38% Cu and 0.06% Mo) from 356 metres depth (Table 1), above the current MRE¹ average of 0.51% CuEq* (0.31% Cu and 0.039% Mo), confirming the continuity and predictability of higher-grade domains within the current resource model.
- MD-061 intersected 291 metres of 0.50% CuEq* (0.27% Cu and 0.044% Mo) from 557 metres depth within 707 metres of continuous mineralization from the kick-off point (Table 1), in an area previously modelled as waste below the current conceptual pit design, advancing the southern expansion vector into the Mocoa–La Estrella corridor.
- The Company's third drill rig is conducting maiden drilling at
La Estrella , testing the target from the southern end of the corridor. - Three drill rigs operating on site at full capacity.
"These results advance both ends of the same story. MD-062 confirms that the high-grade domains we modelled are exactly where we expected them, that gives us confidence in the model as we move toward the PEA. MD-061 takes us beyond the current resource boundary and into the corridor toward the La Estrella, where our third rig is now drilling from the other end. We are building a picture hole by hole, and it is coming into focus." –
MD-061
Hole MD-061 was drilled as a directional daughter hole from mother hole MD-056 to continue evaluating the southern expansion potential of the Mocoa system below the current conceptual pit design. The hole forms part of a systematic follow-up to previously reported holes MD-054, MD-056 and MD-058 (refer to news releases dated
|
Hole |
Hole Type |
Kick-off |
From |
To |
Interval |
Cu (%) |
Mo (%) |
CuEq* (%) |
Release |
|
MD-056 |
Mother |
0.0 |
0.0 |
693 |
693 |
0.14 |
0.02 |
0.26 |
|
|
Including |
|
|
161 |
693 |
531 |
0.17 |
0.03 |
0.33 |
|
|
and including |
|
|
459 |
693 |
234 |
0.24 |
0.04 |
0.43 |
|
|
and including |
|
|
616 |
693 |
77 |
0.33 |
0.03 |
0.49 |
|
|
MD-061 |
Daughter |
222 |
222 |
929 |
707 |
0.20 |
0.032 |
0.37 |
|
|
Including |
|
|
304 |
929 |
625 |
0.21 |
0.033 |
0.39 |
|
|
and including |
|
|
469 |
929 |
460 |
0.23 |
0.036 |
0.42 |
|
|
and including |
|
|
557 |
849 |
291 |
0.27 |
0.044 |
0.50 |
|
|
and including |
|
|
761 |
849 |
88 |
0.32 |
0.052 |
0.59 |
|
|
MD-057 |
Mother |
0.0 |
0 |
532 |
532 |
0.25 |
0.027 |
0.39 |
|
|
Including |
|
- |
56 |
532 |
476 |
0.28 |
0.029 |
0.43 |
|
|
and including |
|
- |
341 |
532 |
191 |
0.54 |
0.034 |
0.72 |
|
|
MD-062 |
Daughter |
230 |
230 |
640 |
411 |
0.31 |
0.05 |
0.56 |
|
|
Including |
|
|
356 |
613 |
258 |
0.38 |
0.06 |
0.70 |
Table 1 – Assay results for drill holes MD-061 and MD-062. Directional daughter hole MD-061 was drilled from mother hole MD-056. Directional daughter hole MD-062 was drilled from mother hole MD-057. Kick-off depth means starting point of each daughter hole. *Copper equivalent (CuEq) for drill hole interceptions is calculated as: CuEq (%) = Cu (%) + 5.278 × Mo (%), utilizing metal prices of Cu -
Figure 1. Plan view of the exploration targets and the Mocoa porphyry Cu-Mo deposit. Black dots represent drill pads. The figure also shows the position of the Company's third drill rig, currently drilling (MD-065) northwest from the
MD-061 returned broad and continuous intervals of copper and molybdenum mineralization below the current conceptual pit design, including 707-metres of 0.37% CuEq (0.20% Cu and 0.032% Mo) starting from kick-off point, with grades increasing at depth with 291-metres of 0.50% CuEq (0.27% Cu and 0.044% Mo) starting from 557m (Figure 3). These results continue to demonstrate that mineralization along the southern margin remains open and is strengthening toward the
Figure 2. Plan view of holes MD-061 and MD-062 reported in this release and the position of the cross-section shown in Figures 3 and 5. The distribution of drilling illustrates the emerging corridor between the Mocoa deposit and the
Figure 3. Figure 3. Cross-section along hole MD-061 (section width of 100 metres), showing the 2026 MRE block model and the Cu and Mo grades intercepted. Results to date continue to demonstrate Cu and Mo mineralization below the current conceptual pit design and within areas previously modelled as waste, supporting the potential for resource expansion along the southern margin of the system toward the
Figure 4. Representative core photographs from holes MD-061 (Fig. 4A - c) and MD-062 (Fig. 4D - F) illustrating porphyry-style mineralization and associated hydrothermal alteration. Images highlight the presence of well-developed sulfide mineralization and vein-hosted copper and molybdenum, including higher-grade core zones intersected in directional daughter holes.
Hole MD-062
Drill hole MD-062 was completed as a directional daughter hole from previously reported mother hole MD-057 (refer to news release dated
Figure 5. Cross-section showing mother hole MD-057 and directional daughter hole MD-062, illustrating the geometry of targeted infill drilling within the MRE¹ footprint. High-grade intervals intersected in MD-062 continue to validate the continuity, predictability, and spatial distribution of higher-grade domains within the current resource model, supporting increased geological confidence ahead of future PEA-level studies. The kick-off (KO) point is shown, highlighting the ability to efficiently test multiple portions of the system from a single drill platform.
The directional drilling approach continues to demonstrate significant operational advantages by allowing multiple targets to be efficiently tested from a single platform while reducing surface disturbance and improving geological control. MD-062 successfully intersected long and continuous intervals of copper and molybdenum porphyry mineralization typical of the Mocoa system (Figure 4C - F), returning 411-metres of 0.56% CuEq (0.31% Cu and 0.05% Mo), including 258-metres of 0.70% CuEq (0.38% Cu and 0.06% Mo). The results are consistent with, and locally exceed, grades predicted by the current MRE block model¹, further validating the Company's geological interpretation and the spatial predictability of higher-grade domains within the deposit. Importantly, these results continue to demonstrate that the current resource model is effectively predicting both grade distribution and mineralized continuity in areas of tighter drill spacing, supporting the ongoing advancement of Mocoa toward future engineering and PEA-level evaluation.
Qualified Person and Technical Notes
Copper Giant operates according to a rigorous Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) protocol consistent with industry best practices. For surface samples, 2.5kg of material is taken on each outcrop using chip or channel techniques. Samples are taken by well-trained field helpers supervised by the geologist of the company. Core diameter is a mix of HQ and NQ depending on the depth of the drill hole. Diamond drill core boxes were photographed, sawed, sampled and tagged in maximum 2-metre intervals, stopping in geological boundaries. Samples were bagged, tagged and packaged for shipment by truck from Copper Giant's core logging facilities in Mocoa,
Inferred Mineral Resources are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Inferred Mineral Resources will be upgraded to an Indicated or Measured category.
Copper equivalent (CuEq) for drill hole interceptions is calculated as: CuEq (%) = Cu (%) + 5.278 × Mo (%), utilizing metal prices of Cu -
1 Notes on the MRE of the project
- The MRE was completed by
Kevin Hon ,B.Sc .,P.Geo ., Senior Resource Geologist, andWarren Black ,M.Sc .,P.Geo ., Senior Consultant: Mineral Resources and Geostatistics, both of APEX.Mr. Hon andMr. Black are independent Qualified Persons, as defined by NI 43-101, and are responsible for the completion of the Mineral Resource Estimate, with an effective date ofNovember 18, 2025 .Michael Dufresne ,M.Sc .,P.Geo ., President & CEO of APEX, completed a peer review of the estimate. - Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
- The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
- The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral Resource could potentially be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with continued exploration.
-
The Mineral Resources were estimated in accordance with theCanadian Institute of Mining , Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines (2019) prepared by theCIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by theCIM Council . - Economic assumptions used include
US$4.00 /lb Cu,US$20.00 /lb Mo, process recoveries of 90% for Cu and 95% for Mo, aUS$10 /t processing cost, G&A costs ofUS$1.00 /t, and a 3% NSR royalty - CuEq* values are calculated using a Cu-to-Mo value ratio of 1:5.278, incorporating both metal prices and metallurgical recoveries.
- The constraining pit optimization parameters include a
US$2.5 /t mining cost for both mineralized and waste material and 45° slopes. Pit-constrained Mineral Resources are reported at a cutoff of 0.25% CuEq*.
About the Mocoa Porphyry System
Mocoa was first identified in 1973 through a regional geochemical survey conducted by the
The deposit is hosted in Middle Jurassic dacite and quartz-diorite porphyries intruding andesitic to dacitic volcanics of the Central Cordillera, a 30-kilometre-wide tectonic belt that extends into
A distinguishing geological feature of Mocoa is the presence of a fertile magmatic window spanning roughly ten million years, a prolonged and unusually productive interval of magma generation and evolution that is not commonly observed in other Jurassic porphyry systems within the same belt. This extended fertile period provides a compelling explanation for the system's large metal endowment, broad alteration footprint, and overlapping intrusive and hydrothermal events.
The deposit demonstrates more than 1,100 metres of vertical continuity, with multiple intrusive phases, brecciation episodes, and vein generations reflecting a dynamic and long-lived magmatic–hydrothermal evolution, likely influenced by more than one porphyry center. Mocoa remains open in all directions, and several satellite targets across the broader land package support the interpretation of a district-scale mineralized system.
Mocoa's Mineral Resource Estimate1 comprises Inferred resources of 12.7 billion pounds (Blbs) copper-equivalent (CuEq*) at an average grade of 0.51% CuEq*, including 7.7 Blbs of copper at 0.31% Cu and 1.0 Blbs of molybdenum at 0.039% Mo, within 1,120 million tonnes (Mt).
1
For further information refer to NI 43-101 Technical Report, entitled "Technical Report and Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for
About Copper Giant
The Company is led by a team with uncommon experience, having successfully taken some of the few major copper mines developed in the past two decades from discovery through to construction.
Copper Giant's current focus is the Mocoa copper-molybdenum deposit in southern Colombia, one of the largest undeveloped resources of its kind in the
Guided by the values of respect and responsibility, and grounded in its Good Neighbor philosophy, Copper Giant is committed to creating enduring values for all stakeholders and playing a meaningful role in the global energy transition.
Neither the
This news release includes forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements within, other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding the assay results of drill holes MD-061 and MD-062, the outcome of the Company's current resource expansion strategy; the potential release and timing of future PEA-level studies; other activities and achievements of the Company, including but not limited to: the timing and success for the advancement of the
SOURCE